Jump to content
SAU Community

Building 3 Litre Gtr , Piston Are 30 Thou Out Block


Recommended Posts

I think it's best to speak with a repretable Engine builder about this....I would imagine as long as the ring seal on the head gasket is big enough so the Piston has clearance then i would imagine it should be fine with thicker head gasket.

Cheers Ryan , the story is I have a r32 Gtr 3l bottom end 26 head . Detroit locker in the arse crazy fuel setup os gieken gear box, Carbon twin plate .gt28 60 -10 turbos 260 cam 2000 I'd injectors 6 boost manifolds titanium ferrera everything for the heads oversized valves Killa springs , made 420 kw on 17.8 psi done sixth piston ring , stripped it done pistons ,rods , bearings and done better oil return better oil pump nothing else can be upgraded ! Lol but on putting it together my mechanic has found the pistons are 30 thou hanging out the block , he done the Maths and said a 1.8 head gasket would solve the problem . I'm a bit worried about the idea , don't know how it's happened to be out so far. Wondering the pros and cons on fixing the problem like that ?? Didn't think after spending so much cash I would have this problem arise at this stage of the build . Any thoughts would be appreciated

The pistons in my build hang out by 10-15 thou, I am using a 1.5mm head gasket from memory. You could possibly have valve reliefs cut into the pistons, or have the pistons shaved and balanced again. Best bet to speak to Rhemac or another engine builder/machine shop

how much was shaved from the head and block...surely anyone reputable would've measureed the amount removed?

You mentioned larger valves which even if a thicker head gasket resolved the .75mm (.030") piston protrusion, you'll still have to factor in the amount of valve lift......did you also increase cam lobe lift......even if you didn't, a larger valve head will travel further out of its chamber because of its angle.

There are way too many factors to consider and everything should've been planned together before removing any metal, anywhere....did the machinist have some sort of plan in mind before going nuts on a surface grinder?

Abe's example won't help you...he has .25mm protrusion and more than likely standard size valves.....not sure if he's running more lift though.

PS: I wouldn't go maching piston tops unless you like flirting with death....especially in motors that are renown for smashing already very weak top lands....worse comes to worse, you may have to get a de-comp plate made.

Abe's example won't help you...he has .25mm protrusion and more than likely standard size valves.....not sure if he's running more lift though.

Yeah, Standard valves with 8.5 cams

how do you shorten conrods without cutting them in half.

you could machine the mating surfaces of rod and cap then line bore to get the correct diameter again...but then you would have to re-cut the brg tangs followed by balancing them again.

Sounds like a pretty expensive option not to mention it would weaken the rods

But I like your thinking though :)

Only way around this one is to find out how much metal has been removed in total then replace it with something of similar thickness over and above a standard head gasket thickness.

If the machinist has no recollection of how much material was removed, you'll have to measure (accurately) the overall thickness of the head and block....only an engine reconditioner will have outside mic's or calipers that size.

Good luck with it

Yeah, I was thinking removing the caps, machining the rod side down the 30 thou picking it back up, machine and re bore it.

You kind of forget about the cost of machining when you do it all the time.

def a solution Dale bit who makes a piston with a lower pin height?

regardless, he also needs to consider how much has been taken off the head's surface now that he's running a larger valve which all adds to valve protrusion...not to mention that by bringing cams closer to the crank you also have valve timing issues that you need to sort out...but shouldn't be too much of an issue with adj gears.

I'd still want to know how much material has been removed for peace of mind

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

So much crazy talk happening here, de-comp plates what the hell, it is in reality a pretty straight forward build.

If they have machined off too much then a thicker gasket could indeed fix you problem, with out measuring everything I couldn't tell you what you need. Have the CC'd your combustion chambers? If we had that information and the cc of the dome in your pistons we could at least then try to work out the comp ratio. As far as the pistons hitting valves you will need to dummy assemble the motor with some Plasticine and turn the motor over, dissect it and then measure the piston to valve clearances.

Sounds like a recipe for disaster if this has come from your "engine builder"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...