Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am still fuming about this! 3 weeks until Webber can get his anrey 2010 on and use this as his tackling fuel. The more I think about it the more I believe that Vettel needs formal dressing down.

To antagonise Mark is all part of the game and thats fine. to beat him sux but is the sport. To go against the team management...Newey's reaction to what he was saying spoke volumes about the mood of the team. The only way to drive it home to the brat is wither beat him with a stick or where it hurts...in the WDC. I think they shoudl bench him for a race or at a minimum make him sit out P1 and give Buemi the Friday practice session

I love how all the webber fans are crying about this saga, majority of them them being the same people that teared up anytime Ferrari used team orders.

And before you waste your time typing, its the same thing. Team orders.

Weber knew where he stood in the pecking order and so does vettel, If the shoe were on the other foot you can bet weber would be keelhauled or worse.

He needs to man up and knock the justin beiber lookalike clean out and flip the bird as he walks from redbull.

to me, 2 exact same situations one with the team outcome one with the selfish outcome.

Hamilton told to slow down to conserve petrol, rosberg told not to over take and did the team thing

Webber told "21" and conserve your car, Vettel ignores the request and acts selfeshly.

Two different teams, two very different outcomes.

Selfish, selfish man.

For my money, I'm less pissed off about two guys racing to the flag against team orders than the ridiculous situation at Mercedes where team orders force a much faster guy to sit behind the much slower team-mate for the last 20 minutes. I came here to see a race FFS. Calling the race 'over' at two-thirds or three-quarter distance is a farce. If the top 4 are going to do that you might as well drop the chequer early and end the stage show.

to me, 2 exact same situations one with the team outcome one with the selfish outcome.

Hamilton told to slow down to conserve petrol, rosberg told not to over take and did the team thing

Webber told "21" and conserve your car, Vettel ignores the request and acts selfeshly.

Two different teams, two very different outcomes.

Selfish, selfish man.

Just goes to show you have to be a ruthless flamin mongrel to be a WDC. Malaysia was a perfect example of why Vettel has multiple WDC, Webber has none and Rosberg will never have any in the future. In F1 if you play the team game you don't have the "win at all costs" mentality and you won't clean up a title unless everyone else falls on their swords.

I feel sorry for Mark, Vettel is an out and out dickhead and deserves a punch in the face or to be put in the wall next race but 25 points is what counts at the end of the year. RBR won't give him any more than a slap on the wrist.

I don't want to believe you need to be a c0ckbag to be WDC. I know DC was too nice and Mika a bit of a vilian when it came to team politics. I think the talk around the traps at Jagua and Williams was that Mark was up for a bit og mind games with teammates,

Thinking back Button was about the only recent WDC that isnt a egomaniac. Before that I think you have to look at Hill...not many :(

Lets play a what if game, Vetel may or may not have caught him if he hadn't slowed down, but if he did catch him, they had a bloody good race and vetel did win that unless mark was given the heave ho after trading places. They could have raced to the end and we would of had more of what was real racing! RBR wouldn't do that because of the constructors and why web probably fell back a bunch.

You could even ask why was mark put onto the harder compounds twice in a row, especially for the last stint. But whatever. I hate team orders! if you didn't fuel one to the end you shouldn't keep the other behind just because he's your bloody favorite. The employment contracts seem to be determining who places where, I get that its a really set / fixed formula and not formula libre but still... what the hell.

Just read the news.... ouch.

In soccer, individuals & teams (clubs on the whole, from top to bottom) get into serious trouble for match fixing. Q: Why is F1 so different?

Time to follow a new team I think; Lotus? Where's Nissan? :P

But quietly hoping MW fires up, does his own thing (ie fuc* orders!) before moving to a different team, and smashes the Tool in WDC points by the end of the year.....

I think the Hamilton thing probably has less to do with team orders and being No.1 and more to do with the fact that there are probably clauses in Hamiltons contract that state unless he is able to score X points over a season he can walk. He would be mad to take a multi year deal without some sort of perforamance clause so suspect Ross is happier to pull a few punches to make sure Hamo gets points and contractually cant walk


You could even ask why was mark put onto the harder compounds twice in a row, especially for the last stint. But whatever.

Clearly heard him on the team radio befor ethe last pit stop saying he preferred the Hards.

MW now has an extra motivation for 2013 - deny SV another WDC

If that wasn't already his motivation for the year (ie win the WDC himself) he's in the wrong sport. Every driver out there wants to win the WDC. Period.

Loving the conspiracy theories...Surely people posting in here know that the driver has the biggest say in tyre choice etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...