Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cheers Disco, I do appreciate the newer car vibe. For myself I actually have an S14 and am nearly finished with the setup. The sigma is sort of a side project for me, mainly my brothers with some help from myself. Realistically if I dont participate nothing will ever get done.

Looking under the bonnet and seeing the manifold etc really does make me sympathetic to the old astron lol, a lot of time and effort has gone into this setup and it would be a shame to give up on it. The money to date is also a major factor for me to try harder. I wont say how much has been spent to date, but it is a lot.

Just to be clear would LSA need to be a higher or smaller number? I will put my feelers out for a factory cam, brother wont like that but it may get us somewhere. Ill also try to track down a larger housing for the GT30.

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

higher=less overlap

not sure how mnay cams you've changed in sohc motors disco..but that reaks of problems

with turbo cam 10+yrs ago..things have changed a lot since then and cam makers have cottoned on what a

engine needs a lot better...we aren't getting old blower grinds anymore with large overlap that blow all the energy out the ass end. I think all the problems you mentioned come back to to lsa actually..

I've had people sell me blower grinds that where shocking 10+yrs ago when asking for turbo cams, and yes all those

problems existed, but the grinds these days are alot different.

Even a basic stage one cam with a 114lsa would outperform a "standard" cam in every way usually, theres more to cams

than just duration and lift, the way the cam is designed in regards to the lobe shape has a big effect on drivability,

Even going back to sohc cam rb30's, the tighe cams are quick lift cams, they run much more lift and duration than stock..but still make more bottom end and midrange torque than the stock cam and spool a turbo quicker...and make another 30-40rwkw..lol

twin cam stuff is a different kettle of fish again, and the designs are much more recent..

personally if i only had the choice of one , i'll take duration over lift any day of the week with a turbo car..providing i can change the LSA

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Jase has the car been tuned on both cams or only one? And if 1 which 1?

Maybe bring it up one day and i'll spend an hour on it too see if the ignition timing is tuned correctly by the last tuner

Cheers Jez ill probably take you up on that hour. Would be good to get a cost effective second opinion on the tune also. As stated I think its OK but then again im no tuner. Have you got software for an EMS stinger?

As for the cam it was originally tuned for the smaller cam and then was touched up with the larger. Not a great deal of time was spent on the larger but I dont think there was much left in it anyhow. An hour on your dyno will tell us A LOT though.

Darren im thinking ill force him back to the first cam which is a stage 2, has 230* @ .50 and 114* LSA. Do you think that cam is significantly better suited or think I am wasting my time?

I'll also see about getting a housing, maybe track down the supplier of the ones Scotty mentioned or see if Stao can make me one. Would you be more inclined to test a .82 or 1.06? My gut feel is saying go the 1.06

Id personally go back to the first cam for testing, as to me it takes one thing out of the equation, as in "theory" that one should

work fine with that setup. If you do fix the problem and its something else, then you can refit it later and re test it.

out of interest, what type of cooler is fitted?, much pressure drop?, and what valve springs? especially with big cam?

close to coil bind?, its not getting valve float from boost pressure?

The big one is something i would fit if a mate said i want a 2.6 turbo and i want to turn the world on its axis.

And even though i am no astron expert i'd spec that with a 116 LSA and a PT6466 with plenty of boost shoved up its ass.....lol

This is why i like old motors turboed and like working on them , yes they are a pain in the ass, but f**k me at least you have to

think and work some stuff out for yourself, much better satisfaction than buying most newer motors, any idiot can

get a good result out of a Rb25 etc..lol

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

I woudn't take that to heart..lol, but look at how much more info there is out there for newer motors, its like building a oversized model kit

most of the time..cars being cars, its not always going to be smooth sailing for some unlucky ones..but thats just cars in general

thats why love and hate them at the same time!

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Haha nah you're right mate, I can have a laugh at my expense :laugh:

OT, I don't have anything useful to input, but I've been following the thread with interest. Keen to see how you go Scott!

out of interest, what type of cooler is fitted?, much pressure drop?, and what valve springs? especially with big cam?

close to coil bind?, its not getting valve float from boost pressure?

The cooler is a china 450x300 (shorter variant to the generic 600x300). Was purch back in the day from JJ, quality seems fine and no issues. Cooler piping is 2.5" from outlet to throttle. Throttle is a little small but dont think that would hold it back that much. Not any smaller than an S14 VCT throttle body from memory.

Valve springs are actually the matching item for the cam. They were purchased as a set from camtech. Im gonna try get that smaller cam back in ASAP, need to beat bro to pulling the motor as hes wanting to rebuild the motor (not that it will help). Im wanting to find the problem and then retune on a fresh motor.

Cheers for the input guys, I'll find some time to pay Jez a visit soon and see what he and his dyno have to say. Hopefully a feeble issue can be found and sorted or at least the bigger issue will rear its ugly head.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...