Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 192
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

good job!

however for the comp, you had just a little too much resting hang time on that first attempt at the bottom of the reps. As per the rule.

* No resting at the bottom of the rep,

Your first 2 reps are right in that first video set for form, are what you are after. All the way to the bottom/straight arm stretch. then straight back up ,no hang time.

Resting is way harder, if you want proof, make everyone rest for a count of five at the bottom, see how they go then

From experience it's actually easier to rest in a hang between reps.

As macdog appreciates from his recent experience, a little rest is helpful , There is an opportunity for relaxation of some of the key back muscles at the bottom of the rep.

I can hang for quite some time, almost to the point where I can rest between sets. The muscle fatigue is different, it is mostly your grip and arms. This is a back movement chiefly the way it prescribed.

Agreed, it's like bouncing deadlifts when doing them for reps. You use the elasticity that is stored in the muscle when you don't pause, whereas with the pause you have to generate all the force.

No. You will find done right you are lowering just past the point where the dynamic tension affords much advantage. This 'bouncing' is also noted as 'not allowed' in the rules.

I have no problem if someone believes the rules makes the pullup 'easier'. This belief alone might help you do more.

However, as the rule stands. Pauses are out. If you don't need to pause , don't do it. Then we can count the effort.

I have no problem if someone believes the rules makes the pullup 'easier'. This belief alone might help you do more.

However, as the rule stands. Pauses are out. If you don't need to pause , don't do it. Then we can count the effort.

+1

If the rule benefits you, then why complain about it??? It's not that hard to stick to it. Get some more vids up people...the weekend is over now!

I have no problem if someone believes the rules makes the pullup 'easier'. This belief alone might help you do more.

However, as the rule stands. Pauses are out. If you don't need to pause , don't do it. Then we can count the effort.

Plus...

I think doing chin ups first thing in the morning is better.

Punched out 15 this morning at 6:30am no rest. dont have a video though. will take one thursday morning!! haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 馃槂
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
    • Hopefully not, since he knows the fuses work ha ha ha
  • Create New...