Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi I'm in need of some advice, so hears the story........

I have a r33 GTR with HKS gt-rs turbos, HKS manifolds, dumps etc. and all supporting mods. On a standard motor internally it made 460hp at 18psi.

Now have a built motor with 264 deg cams, valve springs etc etc. got on the dyno the other day. The car wouldn't make boost. Re routed some vaccum lines and seemed to fix the problem. Then te car was making 22psi and started making less and less boost. Te end result was 350hp at 15psi which is shithouse. Now here's the kicker. The boost gauge and apexi avcr both tea 1.30 kg/cm2 however it was only making 15psi on the dyno. Turning the boost up to 1.70kh/cm2 on the avcr and both the avcr and boost gauge read that but no difference in power.

I have replaced the exhaust going larger thinking it could have been an issue, made it rev freerer but did not fix the issue.

Could this be an issue with vaccum lines run incorrectly? Any other suggestions as to whatnot could be?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/419404-built-gtr-not-making-power/
Share on other sites

Car is running currently on waste gate with the boost controller turned off and it's reading 1.30 kg/cm2. I believe the adjustable actuators aren't set exactly the same cause in getting a bit of turbo shuffle, but surely that can't be the main issue

Making less and less boost?

I had the same problem, ended up been a split in the intercooler hose that connects to the Twin Turbo pipe, but it was underneath and you couldn't see it

i agree if it was making less and less boost it sounds like you have a leak,

do the "twin turbo pipe mod" to try and eliminate that shuffle

check to BOV's are hooked up correctly i often see the vac/boost reference line swapped around with other lines in the vicinity and they bleed boost like nothing else... on a std gtr its around a 40rwkw loss.

Just compressed air works well, make up a bung for the intake of the turbo and pump 30psi into it. Blowing bong smoke up there just makes the escaping air easier to see but you will hear any leaks just fine.

ill try to pressure test/smoke test it this weekend. As far as vbaccum lines are concerned it is certainly possible that i have my vaccum setup incoreect. ive been searching etc, but cant seem to find a difinitive answer on it all.

i have double checked my vaccum lines etc and they all appear to be as they should. i noticed the other day when the car gets warm it idles at around 1300-1400 rpm, so that to me suggest vaccum leak. however ill check the intercooler piping and go from there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...