Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think you miss the point of what Stabby said. If you measure the same voltage up at the coils as the battery supplies (effectively what the alternator supplies given that to make this measurement you'd have the motor running) then the current is not high enough to cause a significant voltage drop, and so bigger wire won't help.

Assuming that the above is the result of the test. I would say that if everything is wired as per design and not faulty, that it should work that way, as the coils simply don't draw that much current. You'd need a bad connection or something to do it. And as I said above, you'd be better off fixing the real problem than patching it.

I added a relay at the beginning of the coil pack loom and now I can run a larger plug gap. Ideally you would make an entire new coil pack loom but im lazy..

Its been a while since I did it but im pretty sure I tested before/after and there was a voltage difference..

If the original wiring is tarnished it WILL have higher resistance over it and current draw for the coils will be hampered.

I'm not sure what sort of resistance you will be looking for but you can definitely test it.

I think you miss the point of what Stabby said. If you measure the same voltage up at the coils as the battery supplies (effectively what the alternator supplies given that to make this measurement you'd have the motor running) then the current is not high enough to cause a significant voltage drop, and so bigger wire won't help.

Assuming that the above is the result of the test. I would say that if everything is wired as per design and not faulty, that it should work that way, as the coils simply don't draw that much current. You'd need a bad connection or something to do it. And as I said above, you'd be better off fixing the real problem than patching it.

I'm sorry bloke but you need to read up on electrical 101. Voltage, Amps and Ohms are all relative to each other. You can't just measure the volts at 14.4V and say "she's all good mate". You have to measure 2 of the 3 variables before you can do the full calculation (volts = amps X resistance). Like I said, it is likely that it will measure the same as battery/alternator voltage as long as there are wires completing the circuit. When there is a resistor, short, etc in the circuit then it will likely read a lower voltage but not if say 8 of the 9 wire strands have broken through. If you measure the volts and the resistance or volts and the amps then you can use the electrical equation to work out if there is a drama, you can't use one of the three to presume everything is fine.

I think you're presuming that if the voltage is alternator voltage at the coils then it's fine but that's not true. If the voltage is fine but the circuit is crap (high resistance) then the amps will be crap. Example- 14.4 volts = 7.2 ohms X 2 amps would be horrible but it's still 14.4 volts. 14.4 volts = 1.44 ohms X 10 amps would be a whole different scenario right? It's still 14.4 volts but at a much higher amperage. Which circuit do you think is better???

If that still doesn't make sense then I'll shut up!

Dude, You are the one who is wrong. If you have the circuit drawing current, and you do not measure a noticeable voltage drop, then the resistance is by definition low. You don't need to go all year 11 "I studied Ohm's Law in Tech Studies" on us.

If you have poor wiring/connections before the load (the coils), sufficient to affect things in a bad way, then you will measure a lower voltage at the coils whilst they are running. If you do not measure a lower voltage, THEN THERE IS NO f**kING PROBLEM.

I'm willing to bet I had a full understanding of Ohm's Law before you were even out of kindergarten. Let's just say that we're talking somewhere around 1980.......

We (clearly!!) both think we're right so let's leave it there!

If you want to water your garden quicker, get a bigger hose!

That was my last pathetic attempt at winning the argument if I need to point it out.

Peace out!

I'm sorry bloke but you need to read up on electrical 101. Voltage, Amps and Ohms are all relative to each other. You can't just measure the volts at 14.4V and say "she's all good mate". You have to measure 2 of the 3 variables before you can do the full calculation (volts = amps X resistance).

The way to show you have the biggest e-cock, is to mount the best argument. Here's my attempt to flop it out.

The current will be whatever V=IR says it is, when we complete the circuit. If we have 2 x 1 ohm resistors in series with our 14.4v power source, the current is 7.2 amps in our circuit. This means that if we look at one of the resistors in isolation, it is seeing 7.2 volts since V = 7.2 amps X 1 ohm. Now if we replace those 1 ohm resistors with 10 ohm resistors, the current is 0.72 amps, and if we again look at one of the resistors in isolation, V = 0.72 amps x 10 ohms = 7.2v again. So even though current changes significantly, we end up the same place. Resistors in series each step down the voltage, so if the voltage is the same we know that the resistance is zero by deduction. The current is a side effect during measurement. FWIW multimeters have a resistance in the megaohms, so when we're measuring the resistance of the coilpack loom, the current is tiny whether the resistance in the wire is high or low, because its in series and the meters resistance dominates.

Now, since the resistance of the primary solenoid in the coil is fixed, any resistance in the wiring to the coil will increase the entire circuits resistance, since its in series, and less current will flow the the coil and the energy at the spark plug will be lower. So we want the only resistance in this circuit to be caused by the primary solenoid, so we can get the max current in the circuit and max power at the spark plug.

HTH.

Oh and saying "go read electrical 101" was rude, and if you're wrong after saying something like that, it makes you look like an arrogant and incompetent jerk. Perhaps a case of Dunning-Kruger effect?

You win, your virtual cock is much larger than mine.

Dunning-Kruger Effect? I think that's me every time I look at myself in the mirror.

I'm a car salesman, the key to being wrong is thoroughly convincing yourself that you're right which tends to have a contagious effect... Bloody internet just doesn't transmit contagions like face to face contact. I've been let down by technology.

If I'm wrong (and due to the weight of numbers building against my argument seems that I am) then I'll hereby bow out beaten.

If I've offended- sorry.

Over and out.

You win, your virtual cock is much larger than mine.

Whoa that was easy. You can tell by how vague my explanation is that I only sort of understand this stuff. A good way to know if you really understand something is to see if you can explain it in a clear and concise manner.

Hey guys, just catching up on my reading here.

A couple of things that people haven't mentioned.

1) Ensure you are using decent wiring. Core should be minimum 1mm if not 2mm. My CDI unit says that 0.75mm is adequate, but just looks too small to me.

2) Also I'd personally use a relay if you are going to hard wire the 12v source to the coils. It won't degrade any performance but will save you the next time you're turning a spanner near the coils.

Hard wiring is actually a old school hot rod tip from the days before electronic ignition. Cars used to run a resistor to drop down the 12v to more between 3 and 6 to fire the coil. This put less strain on the coil so it lasted longer. Funny huh!

  • 2 weeks later...

Does anyone know what wire or pin that is the feed (wire to battery with this mod)

R32 Gtr

I'm unable to test because in the middle of a build but would be easy to do now (car in peices)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...