Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I can't remember if I mentioned it but a feller inside Garretts aftermarket section reckons that the NS111 is not new but is still a very efficient design aero wise . Its not impossibe that it could be made of Inconel rather than Mar M and find its way into production aftermarket 30 series turbochargers . Thats what I would hope for but who knows what the future brings .

Theres no sign of the 53.8mm NS111 turbine in the GT28 series being replaced and for what it has to do it works very well .

A real rough hack formula based on the increase in diameter (area actually) from almost 54 to 60mm may give a vague comparison of what the 60mm version is good for . It looks to be about 24% greater area than the 53.84mm one .

A .

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I wasn't offended at all disco just thought it was a smidge rude just ignoring my offer. A simple no thanks would of been fine :) But the thing is how could you know it wasn't what you were looking for if you never gave it a chance? I know you're very anti GT30 but if you are chasing that 300kw goal realistically what are your other options? EVERYBODY that drove or rode shotgun in my car was impressed with its performance and streetability. Much to your beliefs you won't get a better street setup than mine and to be honest having something that isn't making boost as soon as you touch the throttle is more streetable as I'm certain it aids in fuel economy on the street as its not under load constantly imo.

Dale your reaction when my car came on song when you drove it (Laughing your ass off) was priceless mate ;)

Mick I ment no offense , so don't be . I think I remember reading your account of how your car goes and thinking while the results sound very impressive probably a bit over the top for me . I don't really want to use a turbo with a T04E sized compressor housing if I can help it and have to space it out on the exhaust manifold . This is one of the reasons why I'm mildly interested in the GTX3067R - it uses a T04B comp housing of roughly similar dimensions to my GTRS . An EFR 7163 is also remarkably compact for whats claimed of them .

To look in my engine bay you have to be very familiar with a GTS25T to notice much other than what Nissan put there . Its a big challenge to have a bit more oomph and have it look very standard .

I wholeheartedly agree that a ride in your car would be interesting and if we can find the time I look forward to it .

Now on this GT30/TR30 turbine business . The reality is that the TR30 one is not currently on offer where the GT30s are readily available . I have word that this is being looked at but no timeframe - in other words don't hold your breath . In the meantime the most responsive current tech GT30 turbo is the GTX3067R and the first real world results should be coming through any day now . The EFR 7163 is a bit further away and still going through final development .

ATM I'm looking at other things with this car so turbo changes can wait .

A .

Poking around, I found these two pics. One is of the WRC Ford Zetec (restricted, 2.5 bar), the other is Ken Block's Ford Fiesta(unrestricted, 4 bar). The detail is quite amazing when you go through them.

post-19642-0-79186700-1362827974_thumb.jpg

post-19642-0-26879900-1362827992_thumb.jpg

I think there was a link somewhere indicating a Mazda LMP was running a TR30 but no pics found.

There is also a Garrett spec sheet/blurb posted up here http://www.freshalloy.com/showthread.php/153372-Tial-vs-Twinscroll/page2 that makes for interesting reading too. They state explicitly that a couple of their compressor specs are for restrictor type classes. Makes Lithium's dyno sheets and comments about that Evo hold pretty true.

Adrian there will always be a reason to want something different than the next man. Mick's R33 would be difficult to improve upon for a very streetable and innocuous road car perspective. It's quiet, and it hammers in a refined way. It's that much fun I would challenge anyone to not laugh aloud during/after a drive. Some day I look to repaying the favour to him.

Given you have the hardware available, I would think that a bit of a run with Mick would see your 52T GT3076 fitted up and the car tuned for ethanol. I wouldn't be holding my breath for massive improvements in transients from that spec and the GTX3067. Noticeable, yes, but only slight. Consult with Wolverine if necessary regarding what happens when the turbine spec is unchanged and comp is altered from 82 to 76mm.

.Your Vipec can handle any changes necessary with a turbo upgrade, and the pump is easy - just be sure to get a direct full-voltage feed.

Be good to see a bit of info regarding the EFR gear flowing into this thread too.

How would a GTX3067 compare to a GT2876 ( 48trim , 0.86rear) if you added an anti-surge cover and maybe an external wastegate?

Wasnt the GT2876 designed for conditions such as race cars operate in, restricted intake or are they still a terrible idea?

Edited by AngryRBGTX

sorry didnt make that clear, the gt2876 would have the port shrouded cover and external gate i mean, to help with surge and the small rear.

oh and add E85

Edited by AngryRBGTX

Trawling around I found a bit of info regarding the Mazda MZR-R, as developed by AER. I understand that AER was the an offshoot from Cosworth following their sale and corporate split-up, and this company does a lot of contract development work specifically for race/competition engines.

I was already aware of a lot of speed gear available through the UK to suit the Mazda MZR, reference typically being made to Cosworth as the supplier. That production engine is what we see in things like the MX5, CX5, Ford Focus, and Falcon Ecoboost 4 cylinder. There is some pretty serious internal gear that is used in the MZR so we see them installed in 2.3 litre N/A form into Mark 2 Escorts, as a modern and cheaper equivalent of the 70s original BDA Cosworth.

Seems that Mazda have been involved with this project engine powering LMP sports cars, and reference is made to the use of the TR30 in restrictor equipped form. Check http://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/technology/mazda-mzr-r-lmp2/ and http://www.aerltd.com/products.html

Pics of that engine in its proper environment, TR30 installed.

post-19642-0-82513300-1362911914_thumb.jpg post-19642-0-29297600-1362911935_thumb.jpg

One significant design outcome is very light weight of the TR30. I saw a claim of 8 pounds.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...