Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So it looks like the go would be:

Blank radiator cap, Radiator Filler neck to top of header tank, hoses from intake runners to top of header tank
Then bottom of header tank to thermostat housing..

Would i still require an overflow bottle if the header tank is say 2Lt?

On 8/22/2018 at 9:39 PM, BlackBox said:

So do i tap a thread in the top of the runners and install bleed screws or maybe a swirl pot is the easier option? 

I dont have a close up pic but i put a plug in the turbo water return and 2 bleeders in the manifoldScreenshot_20180902-000552_Gallery.thumb.jpg.984cfdff8873268bac3f11a4ae36e970.jpg

The idea was to slip some hose over the bleeders and connect to a bottle that can hang from the bonnet while bleeding the system, just to keep coolant from getting everywhere.

Havent thought too much about this lately as i dont have a running motor so dont really need to worry about how to plumb the water system up

20 minutes ago, NEO25T said:

I dont have a close up pic but i put a plug in the turbo water return and 2 bleeders in the manifoldScreenshot_20180902-000552_Gallery.thumb.jpg.984cfdff8873268bac3f11a4ae36e970.jpg

The idea was to slip some hose over the bleeders and connect to a bottle that can hang from the bonnet while bleeding the system, just to keep coolant from getting everywhere.

Havent thought too much about this lately as i dont have a running motor so dont really need to worry about how to plumb the water system up

 

20 minutes ago, NEO25T said:

I dont have a close up pic but i put a plug in the turbo water return and 2 bleeders in the manifoldScreenshot_20180902-000552_Gallery.thumb.jpg.984cfdff8873268bac3f11a4ae36e970.jpg

The idea was to slip some hose over the bleeders and connect to a bottle that can hang from the bonnet while bleeding the system, just to keep coolant from getting everywhere.

Havent thought too much about this lately as i dont have a running motor so dont really need to worry about how to plumb the water system up

Do you intend on using one of those spare fittings in the back of the thermostat housing for the bottom fitting of the tank? 

Ive only got a part time motor going in at the monent so will leave this alone for now.

I did tap the other one for a -12 fitting to go in so i dont have that fitting on the back of the thermostat housing any more, keep changing my mind how ill set it up

7 hours ago, BlackBox said:

Is it ok to run the bottom of the header to the thermostat housing or does the header need to go to the bottom of the radiator? If so what do i do with the fitting on the thermostat housing

https://www.pirate4x4.com/tech/billavista/Cooling/

Check out the article above. Its a good read about these system, not on our engines, but informative 

20 hours ago, BlackBox said:

Is it ok to run the bottom of the header to the thermostat housing or does the header need to go to the bottom of the radiator? If so what do i do with the fitting on the thermostat housing

It goes to a bleed point from factory so that might be the best place to run it

It goes to a bleed point from factory so that might be the best place to run it
You are saying the bottom of the header tank may be the best place? Or the factory bleed point? (which i dont have)
The barb on the back of the thermostat housing is only 3/8 and they say the bottom of the header tank should be fed by a hose 3/4 minimum..
I also cant find a header tank with 3/8 barbs on it :/ and after playing around all day cant find a suitable location to mount a tank that would be high enough that clears my bonnet, plenum strut brace and theottle cable...

If once it is initially bled it will remain so then i am really in favour of just installing bleed nipples, as long as the cooling system doesnt release gas/vapour during driving?
4 hours ago, BlackBox said:

You are saying the bottom of the header tank may be the best place? Or the factory bleed point? (which i dont have)
The barb on the back of the thermostat housing is only 3/8 and they say the bottom of the header tank should be fed by a hose 3/4 minimum..
I also cant find a header tank with 3/8 barbs on it :/ and after playing around all day cant find a suitable location to mount a tank that would be high enough that clears my bonnet, plenum strut brace and theottle cable...

If once it is initially bled it will remain so then i am really in favour of just installing bleed nipples, as long as the cooling system doesnt release gas/vapour during driving?

Are you installing this in a similar way as a “swirl tank”, ie the Greddy coolant swirl tank? In essence you are simply raising the highest coolant level above the height of the engine, so you can effectively maintain zero air pockets in the cooling system. The original radiator cap gets a dumb cap, and the expansion gets the pressure release cap at the new higher level. By running hoses from the highest point of the radiator (the old overflow nipple), and the highest point of the engine (the OEM bleed port) to the tank, you creating flow paths of liquid where air normally would get trapped. Correct if I am wrong on that portion....

The lower port on the tank in most systems I see gets tee’d into the lower radiator hose, which would effectively cause a “suction” or flow out of the bottom of the tank on an RB. Correct? Thus drawing in the coolant from the hoses connected to the head and radiator, creating a constant (kind of) flow in the tank, effectively creating a continuous air bleed. Now, the question of whether you can install the tanks “bottom fitting” before (lower rad hose) or after (behind the thermostat housing) is one I am still unsure of. However, in my mind it would be preferable to have it plumbed behind the thermostat, as the flow path be provided even when the thermostat is closed. Just like your heater core, which gets coolant flow with the thermostat closed. My guess that teeeing into the lower rad hose is for two reasons, one its easy to simply cut the hose  and install the adapter, two, you you really dont need its function until the thermostat would be open anyway. 

In many cases, with the amount of modification we do to these engines, we are left extra barbs and fittings in the coolant and air paths, leaving us creative options to add aftermarket components like this. In the case of the RB26 removing the factory oil cooler leaves you with two 1/2” barbs to work with. On an RB25, if I recall, I haven’t looked at mine in awhile, but there are extra fittings on the heater pipes on the back of the thermostat. As far as the size of the hose to use, I’d like to I know the answer the that question too, with a technical reason behind it. Reason being, the bottom fitting on the Greddy tank is not close to 3/4”, and the plumbing to factory expansion tanks is also not 3/4” either, so I am not sure where 3/4” came from. Check out the Radium Auto coolant expansion tank, and its installation instruction on the website. All of the fitting provided are -6, so in your case with a 3/8” barb behind the thermostat, I dont see why that wouldn’t work. 

  • Like 1
The pipework for these bleeder systems wants to be as small as will work, because the flow bypasses the main circuit, resulting in less flow where you would prefer it (radiator, engine, whatever is being bypassed).
That makes sense, besides the bottom fitting which i imagine is where the coolant is returning to the system
5 hours ago, BlackBox said:
15 hours ago, GTSBoy said:
The pipework for these bleeder systems wants to be as small as will work, because the flow bypasses the main circuit, resulting in less flow where you would prefer it (radiator, engine, whatever is being bypassed).

That makes sense, besides the bottom fitting which i imagine is where the coolant is returning to the system

If my understanding of these systems, yes that would be return. To make the cooling system easier to trace, just use the heater core hoses as your guide. You know the water is drawn in from the thermostat are, so you can assume to call that IN, or suction, or return. Anything attached to that would also behave the same way, like the OEM oil cooler, or throttle body heaters, or turbo feeds/returns. 

I can't remember which way round it works , as in plumbing the swirl pots lower fitting to the bottom radiator hose or to the fitting pressed into the back of the blocks thermostat "bowl" .

I tend to think that the way to go is behind the thermostat rather than in front like Nissan has it standard .

While I'm here if anyone has that fitting that presses into the block from a Neo turbo engine I'm prepared to pay well for a good used one . Neo Ts are about 10mm here where the R33 and Neo NA are 8mm .

Cheers A . 

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...