Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I trial fitted this 6boost low mount with gt3076 and have a few questions.

1) is this external wastegate pipe on the right angle or will it likely over boost ( want to run 18-20psi)

2) the compressor virtually sits ontop of the engine mount, after some shaving im estimating about 10mm clearance at most, so is that enough with engine movement etc?

3) the split on the manifold doesnt run right upto the gate, will that have much effect on the results?

thanks in advance.

6boost manifold

Edited by AngryRBGTX
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423404-will-this-overboost/
Share on other sites

It should be ok, better than most internal gates anyway. It would have more issues holding lower boost, 20psi will be no issue.

The compressor barely moves in relation to the engine mount.

Is it a split pulse turbo and manifold but without the splitter in the gate pipe? It shouldn't be too bad, any reason it wasn't made split though?

yeah its split manifold and turbo but theres not splitter in the gate pipe, I thought buying a 6boost all this stuff would be spot on and not need to do extra work on it.

since ive gone this far should i have a splitter welded in or have it shortened ?

It's up to you Mark, seeing you have most of the manifold split, it seems a cop out to skimp on that little bit of pipe, but perhaps Kyle can't be bothered, or doesn't know how to split the single pipe?

It would add complexity and hence price to the manifold making it cheaper, easier and better flowing to just go with the twin gate setup I guess.

So i spoke to my tuner today and showed him the manifold, apparently boost spiking is very common and i should change the angle of the gate pipe.

so im getting paranoid about what is the best thing to do here, options i can see

1) buy a second gate and hope that theres enough room to squeeze it all in being a low mount setup

2) try to exchange the manifold for a high mount plus have 2 gates

3) have the wastegate gate welded to the turbine housing

Im starting to think option 3 would could be the best because it would fit in the tight space , and also the split is divided more equally and probably a better chance of getting pressure on the gate compared to up on the manifold where theres 6 pipes converging...

is this an option?http://www.sr20-forum.com/turbo/48252-single-wastegate-twinscroll-manifold.html

Edited by AngryRBGTX

Would mounting the Gate off the exhaust housing with a Y section to split both sides of the scroll be the best way to control boost and also possibly get a better result over all with a TS? this is using one 44mm gate..

is this even possible ?

Edited by AngryRBGTX
  • 1 month later...

Any updates on this?

I am planning an almost identical setup. I want to run lowmount Gt3076r but using a Brae Fabrications manifold rather than 6boost.

heres the manifold in question:

http://www.braeautofab.com/apps/photos/album?albumid=12523758

Im pretty sure the gate pipe on his is in the same spot but I was thinking maybe have no gate pipe and weld the gate off the housing like this v v :

33ogsah.png

b9engz.png

Would mounting the Gate off the exhaust housing with a Y section to split both sides of the scroll be the best way to control boost and also possibly get a better result over all with a TS? this is using one 44mm gate..

is this even possible ?

You wouldn't even notice the difference if you try to keep the split up to the gate or just weld the outlet on the housing with no split extended up it. I didn't bother with continuing the split when I went from twin gates on the manifold to one gate off the exhaust housing and there was no difference in response other then we could control boost properly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...