Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How crazy is this?!

I know the new xr6 turbo has been brought up before but with power like this its probly going to dominate all!!

BA Falcon Turbo

10.9 second quarter mile

405kW ATW

12-injector manifold

Standard turbo

Tweaked auto trans

Completely streetable car

http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/A_2144/article.html

-----------------------------------------------

And the new FPV Typhoon:

Being released end of 2004

Turbo-charged 4.0-Litre DOHC 24 valve 6 Cyl.

Max Power: 270kw @ 5,250rpm

Max Torque: 550Nm @ 2,000 to 4,250rpm

http://www.fpv.com.au/swf/f6typhoon.htm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42421-does-this-bother-you/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I like it :rofl:

Altho ide be a little :D at a 10.9 from 405 Kw at the wheels

Besides their weight, and lack of sports car looks, there pretty cool

-10.9 was done on slicks too

It still amazes me how advanced japanese engines are, the XR6T is a 4.0 L turbo.

Making 250kw.

GTR engine is only 2.6, and is very close to 250kw, even tho its stated to be 206

Bring on the new GTR! 300kw from a 3.2L :aroused:

"It still amazes me how advanced japanese engines are, the XR6T is a 4.0 L turbo.

Making 250kw.

GTR engine is only 2.6, and is very close to 250kw, even tho its stated to be 206"

You’re comparing a motor that has been in production for maybe a year to a motor that has been around for how many years?

Development takes time and dollars. Because a motor makes xx hp/ci, doesn’t make it more technologically advanced than another. Otherwise a 350 chev would be one of the most advanced motors when it comes to hp/ci.

Upset at 10.9 from 405rwkw? Who cares how much power he made. It’s a brand new ute and it ran 10.9. Bloody good effort.

Looking on the bright side of things, I'd bet my chances on NOT getting pulled over in the XR6 T Ute, than if I were in the Skyline. But can the XR6 take corners?? Either way, apparantley these ford straight sixes are awesome, I have a mate who's building one of these in a 64~Mustang, they're plan is to get Low 10's, and hopefully in the RH-Nines.

I've driven a BA XR8, and it actually cornered a lot better than I thought it would. But even with 240kw or whatever it is (it was stock including suspension), it felt like an absolute slug power-wise due to the excessive weight.

If someone gave me a 10 second XR6T, I wouldn't complain. I'd even drive it proudly and stick a baby seat in the back :D However, that doesn't mean I'd ditch the Skyline or even swap my car preferences. I don't care if the Falcon had twice as much power as the Skyline, it just can't make up for style.

"It still amazes me how advanced japanese engines are, the XR6T is a 4.0 L turbo.  

Making 250kw.  

GTR engine is only 2.6, and is very close to 250kw, even tho its stated to be 206"

You’re comparing a motor that has been in production for maybe a year to a motor that has been around for how many years?  

Development takes time and dollars. Because a motor makes xx hp/ci, doesn’t make it more technologically advanced than another. Otherwise a 350 chev would be one of the most advanced motors when it comes to hp/ci.

Upset at 10.9 from 405rwkw? Who cares how much power he made. It’s a brand new ute and it ran 10.9. Bloody good effort.

they dont just throw an engine together, it would have been in development for years.

the point is that the rb26dett came out in 89 (could be earlier) and compared to a new age engine that is supposed to be the best new technology it still matches up while be a smaller capacity. same for the 1jz and 2jz. therefore it goes to show just how far ahead the japanese are than the rest of the world. also that that an engine can be in production for 15 years and still be one of the best around.

How crazy is this?!

I know the new xr6 turbo has been brought up before but with power like this its probly going to dominate all!!

BA Falcon Turbo  

10.9 second quarter mile  

405kW ATW  

12-injector manifold  

Standard turbo  

Tweaked auto trans  

Completely streetable car  

http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/A_2144/article.html

also that doesnt look like a std turbo to me.

from all that ive heard the std turbo is quite small.

im probably wrong but i cant imagine ford building a top mount turbo on their cars

People (after market tuners) have only had the engine to play with/modify for 12 months. Like you said, RB26 came out in 89. Many more years of aftermarket tuning have gone into it. How much off the shelf gear can you buy for a RB26 compared to a ford turbo motor? Combinations are well documented for rb26’s you know what works and what doesn’t. With the fords, its never been done before. Nice effort I think.

Im not bagging the rb26, just pointing out that this guys work is a great effort.

the xr6 turbo supposbly has one of the biggest stock turbo's to come out of the factory.

heres a link to a phase kits for the xr6 turbo. the phase 3 runs a 10.98 sec @ 124.87 mph

there making a phase 4 kit soon.

http://www.airpowersystems.com.au/falcon/xr6turbo.htm

they run a GT40 from the factory, quite large indeed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
    • Ceste, jak se mas Marek...sorry I only have english keyboard. Are you a fan of Poland's greatest band ever?   
×
×
  • Create New...