Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I won't know for a few weeks as I've got a clutch to do, a cage to fit, a new seat mount to make, and a splitter to make and fit before I can get to the track =\

Keep tabs on my build thread though, I always talk results in there.

  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What do people recommend for caster alignment for semis? Is it better to have more caster and less camber or the other way around? and how much is too much?

Thanks

yep more castor, less camber. Castor is dynamic camber so you get the benefits without the drawback on straight line traction.

you have too much caster when either:

* you cannot turn the steering wheel

* the wheel fits the guard or firewall

rightio, thanks duncan :)

getting an alignment next week, I think this should be ok

Front, -3deg camber, 1mm total toe out, 5deg castor

Rear, -1.5 camber, 1mm total toe in ( till i hit a bump, then 11ty camber and toe)

sounds like a reasonable start. I would go a little more camber in the GTR but I think your car is strut front end, right? I'd also go less toe at the rear but again it is different to gtr setup.

On the advice of other S13 drivers I ended up with almost -3 fron and -1.5 rear camber, and total 2mm toe out front and total 2mm toe in rear,

Castor I'm not sure, as much as I could get was the advice.

The toe will be interesting and may be finessed at the track.

Yep, mac strut.

Only issue with toe at the rear dan is my car has semi trailing arm irs, every time the suspension moves the alignment changes drastically. from static to full bump is something like .5mm to 12mm a side. same with camber

Don't worry, you'll go faster than me anyway, toe will make no difference when the driver is a ham sandwich (me).

:D

Would you try doing the alignment yourself? as that was why I started this thread.

Only issue with toe at the rear dan is my car has semi trailing arm irs, every time the suspension moves the alignment changes drastically. from static to full bump is something like .5mm to 12mm a side. same with camber

Get onto Stew Wilkins, he's been playing with 1600s and Z cars for a long time, should have some gear and know how.

http://www.swmotorsport.com.au/index.php

  • 9 months later...

thought id bump this thread up again. :)

i now have a r32/33 multilink rear setup in my car, what alignment do people recommend for them? im using A050s at the moment

No idea from me, but I can bump this also and say that my car handled quite well in my opinion at the logic day I did, it felt nice and direct.

It seemed to air on the id of understeer at the limit in a faster speed sweeper which I think is roughly how you want it anyway?

I wouldn't mind it to be a touch more neutral so I'm assuming a little less front camber or a little firmer in the rear?

James I reckon the big trick is to install adjustable upper links in that rear end. That will allow you to get the camber setting you want, and most importantly, to dial out bump steer from big toe changes as it moves through its travel. Dynamic change is what can make them a handful, as you'd know with the old semi trailing arms.

I'd imagine yours will not be using a whole heap of travel so it's going to be easier to dial things in. It should be possible to get minimal toe change if you're using 50mm of bump and similar for droop.

Static settings, I'd think the 1 - 1.5 neg camber and 1 - 2mm toe in per side. Run it and go from there.

Thanks man. It's had adjustable gear in so it so that won't be a problem. Yeah, the old semi trailing irs is/was quite a handful. Hoping even with some bump Steer the new setup will be a massive improvement.

I had it aligned today. Went with -1.5 camber as you suggested but dialed it back to 0.7mm toe in a side. Rear Toe is used mainly for stability is it not? If I need I can adjust it at the track.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually looks like a Nitrous setup now 馃槅
    • @robbo_rb180 I already have a NEO head on the shitbox 馃槑 Just needs beehive springs so I can rev it past the 8600 rpm limiter, then again pointless too, turbo is out of puff lol. Wen da gods let me win lotto eh?
    • Everyone I know with a90 supra at time attack aren't having issues with 3-5 fast laps so far and one is decent powered one too. Saw a k24 swapped 86 with a 8hp70 and big slicks and aero which had no drama's at QR and Manton Park. I've stuck a 25 row cooler in my setup with 8hp45/50 in the hopes of keeping the oil cool as I plan on some racing next year that 20-30min sessions. I've also geared my car so won't be using 7th and 8th gear too. @Dose Pipe Sutututu just needs to get that samsonas in already and have that tassie guy fit a head and rev it too 11ty thousand rpm. 
    • My embedded systems thoughts have me sitting with GTS on this. Variation between same phone hardware, should be small. However, the internal "intensity" or "volume" amount that say Google passes to the app, will be quite different, as the underlying hardware will be passing different levels for the same volume to the Google OS. Until the app creator has had each individual phone, and set benchmarks and calibrations for each, the amount of error can be quite huge.   It can even be observed by using different phones, recording the same noise, and then playing it back, they end up soon ding different. A big reason for it, is even the different types of mics used in phones have different responses, and different frequency ranges. Then you need to get into the DSP, and the variations in those, their sample rates which then effect their frequency range, and then the quality of the DSP, and what type of hardware conversion they do to for the ADC within the DSP. Oh, and let's not forget at the low level phones are designed to cutout loud sounds. It's one of the reasons they suck in really loud environments (eg concerts). The louder you yell, the more you'll get cutout too Note DSP is Digital Signal Processor ADC is the analogue to data converter. I don't have any real data on what the variation would truly be, however, chat GPT says in general, their output is typically between +/-2dB to +/-5dB of what you're really measuring. So realistically, anything from 4 to 10dB variation is possible even with the same devices.
    • 'sif the error will be that low!
  • Create New...