Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A bit of background first.

I have recently done a DIY minor service, cleaned the throttle body and installed a SxExCx grounding kit and since then the Check Engine Light (C.E.L) display constantly while driving. And when the car is given the beans, the VCD and SLIP lights come on and stay on; only on occasions, not every time which was odd.

The car drives perfectly, no misses or leaks, gear shifts are great. It actually feels heaps better since the service/clean/grounding kit. So it is very odd.

Please also note, I performed the ECU reset and could not clear the C.E.L.

So today I had my car scanned and I got back 4 error codes.

ENGINE: ign signal primary

ABS: abnormal batt voltage

ABS: engine signal 1

CVT-TRANS: starter relay circ.

The codes were deleted/reset but the engine/slip/VCD light came back on while driving home. I will be taking the car back for another scan and a better look into any of the problems.

Does anyone know what would be causing these problems and how to fix them? Any advice would be great.

Cheers,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428473-error-code-help/
Share on other sites

All those codes may have been there for a while, I would check the new error, getting the code number once it's scanned and plug it in to google. Was it a local Mech you went to?

Nissan's Consult3 units give a much more detailed description of faults (sometimes) and it can be worth taking it to Nissan for a scan, but at $150-200 it isn't cheap. The Chinese Consult3 knockoff I use works well on all the ecu's in the car, I also have the Osirus cable which gives good descriptions of engine codes. Other units can be hit and miss, and it would depend if the mech updated the unit with later Japanese protocols.

The slip light could be caused by mismatched tyre sizing also I think. So all three lamps come on together?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428473-error-code-help/#findComment-6924965
Share on other sites

My brothers a mechanic, and he scanned it at his work. They had a brand new scanner that had the option for Infiniti so figured it would work.

He said some of the codes could have been old. Will find out tonight what the outcome of the rescan is.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428473-error-code-help/#findComment-6924980
Share on other sites

If the codes re-occur, I would be tempted to disconnect the grounding kit and see how it goes, since they seem to be voltage related issues. Also check you didn't leave any factory ground disconnected.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428473-error-code-help/#findComment-6925051
Share on other sites

I have my grounding kit going on the tbs to negative terminal and also engine block n terminal n chassis. My tbs are more responsive and easier to drive. Pretty sure it isn't only me who thinks the grounding kit works

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428473-error-code-help/#findComment-6925729
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input guys.

So the rescan came up with the same 4 codes. It points to a voltage issue which could stem from the grounding kit supplying higher voltage which the ECU cant deal with so the engine light comes on. Its not doing any harm to the car, its just an annoyance. So I will be disconnecting the grounding kit to see if it solves the problem.

It would be a shame as I have noticed a difference since putting it on. Its marginal but know how the car felt and drove before and after, its not just a placebo. The factory grounding is weak, just one connection from the battery to the chassis and then a couple from the chassis to certain components. Adding this grounding kit to have connections from the battery to the engine and from there to other point and the trans has to be better right.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428473-error-code-help/#findComment-6925807
Share on other sites

Grounding kits aren't necessilary bad, but they need to be designed properly. If someone just throws a kit together without much thought, you can end up with earth loops which will cause all kinds of voltage/sensor related issues.

From what I have heard, the grounding kits can help a bit with auto transmission shifts. But you would be much better off cleaning the factory grounds and invest in a shift kit for the transmission.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428473-error-code-help/#findComment-6926453
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 1.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 馃槂  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
  • Create New...