Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

21/09/15

Bench Press

30kg x 10

40kg x 5

50kg x 2

62.5kg x 1

60kg x 2

55kg x 5

50kg x 10

50kg x 8

45kg x 11

40kg x 9 (Close Grip)

Deadlift

40kg x 10

60kg x 10

80kg x 5

80kg x 5

Bicep Curl

15kg x 10

20kg x 10

25kg x 9

25kg x 7

22.5kg x 10

20kg x 10

23/09/15

Squat

20kg x 10

40kg x 5

60kg x 3

65kg x 7

70kg x 7

75kg x 2

70kg x 6

65kg x 10

65kg x 10

60kg x 10

Pull-Up

5

5

5

Lat Pulldown

40kg x 10

45kg x 10

50kg x 5

55kg x 5

60kg x 2

Captain's Chair

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

  • Like 1

Hmm dial in closer to your diet or add more sets/reps.

Maybe give a few full body workouts ago.

Hard to comment

Yeah I've cut out all junk food/chocolate. Cut down on alcohol to 1-2 glasses of wine a week. Cut out butter/margarine. I'm now cutting out coffee. Gone from 5 a week to one. Trying to drink 2L water a day. I'm having three low carb days a week, as I'm doing Hypoxi at the moment too.This is an example of my daily diet atm.

When I first wake up: ehp labs oxyshred with 300ml water

Breakfast:1/2 cup oats, 1/2 cup Chobani fat free Greek yogurt, 1/2 cup water, 1 scoop

WPI all mixed together

Snack: banana, 600ml water

Lunch:

Low carb day: poached eggs, spinach, haloumi

Normal carb day: museli and Chobani fat free Greek yoghurt

After lunch: 2 scoops WPI protein shake

Afternoon: 600ml water

Before gym: eggs on toast (no butter/margarine) water

Dinner: usually stir fry veg/quinoa/tofu/chickpeas/broccoli/spinach

BCAA drink with 600ml water

Maybe I'm still eating too much?

Edited by L33SH
  • Like 1

Lets start by saying you are already looking great!

What is the goal and the plan Vs time ? The difference between exercise and training is the absence of a measured goal & plan. Exercise is just doing things , sometimes with the view that you will get somewhere if you do it differently. This is not really training (not saying that you aren't training by the way).

If you are cutting then there will be a definate loss of weight. Hard to be exact but, I you ideally need to have a plan and a quantified goal of some sort. You can't reach 'be leaner' type goals easily or at all, without a plan. Better to have a definative goal. The goal can be adjusted as you learn more about yourself

The reality is that as you get leaner you will lose strength and muscle mass. The loss of muscle mass means the loss of glycogen storage , so you will definately feel weaker as well (you tank much quicker in the workout).

Seems to be some agreement that you want to stay on the 'lift heavy' approach to minimise the loss of muscle. However, it's mentally a challenge at the same time. No one likes being weaker if you enjoy training this way.

Maybe all you need to do is drop a few oats out of breakfast? It won't be much change to eating but, you will know you are there when you start hating the gym performance.

Edited by rev210

Here is an example (rough) of a plan using my dimensions , altough assuming a 20% BF ( I am not doing anything at the moment but, I'd probably do something like this).

It's slightly aggressive at 20% deficit rather than 10-15% for 12 weeks . It assumes a diminishing factor on the relative % of fat Vs musle lost in the weight loss over time.

relatively low number of workout hrs @ 3hrs/week.

Notice the slight increase in calories for the second month. Due to the relative % of LBM effecting the TDEE.

Starting weight 98kg (20%BF = 19.6kg fat/78.4kg LBM) Target = 93kg @ 15%BF

TDEE = 2785 Cal
cut @ -20% deficit (lose 0.5 - 1kg /week Average )
40/40/20 protien / carb / fat

Target Calories = 2228

*** Target 4kg in 4 weeks ***
week 1 & 2 (80/20% of loss fat/LBM)
- 2kg weight
1.6kg fat loss
0.4kg muscle

week 3 & 4 (75/25%)
- 2kg
1.5kg fat loss
0.5kg muscle

Total = 3.1kg fat loss
95kg = ( 17.3%BF = 16.5kg fat)
Revise TDEE = 2798 cal

Target calories = 2238

*** Target 3kg in 4 weeks ***
Week 5 & 6 (70/30%)
- 1.5kg
1.05kg fat loss
0.45kg muscle

Week 7 & 8 (65/35%)
-1.5kg
0.975kg fat loss
0.525kg muscle

Total = 2.025kg fat loss
92kg = ( 15.7%BF = 14.94kg fat)
Revise TDEE = 2752 cal

Target calories = 2201

**** Target 2kg in 4 weeks ***
Week 9 & 10 (60/40 %)
-1kg
-0.6kg fat
-0.4kg muscle

Week 11 & 12 (55/45 %)
-1kg
-0.55kg fat
-0.45kg muscle


FINISH
Total = 1.15kg fat loss
93kg = ( 14.8%BF = 13.79kg fat)

Edited by rev210

Haha getting a bit complicated too soon rev.

Leesh just drop the portion size a little on one of your meals. Leave it a week if there's a loss you're on the right track. If not, reevaluate. Drop a little from another meal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...