Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just got another Invision kit from Autobarn. It works well but doesn't last forever - my lenses were ok for about a year or so with the car virtually always garaged.

Autobarn also sell the Meguiars kit for a few more $$. Would be great to know if there's any real difference between that, Invision and Glassylite.

Also, if anyone knows of a longer lasting UV sealant let us know.

I just recently used the invision stuff on the top of my M35 stagea headlights and to me it made it worse but it worked great on my V35 sedan lights. Ohwell excuse for some mint headlights from nipon land.

Glassylite i think will be my next buy when it happens.

  • 1 month later...

post-76251-0-54013000-1390795174_thumb.jpg

Thought I'd add my own experiences with these 3 products.

In 3rd place the Turtle Kit from Supercheap. It was the cheapest out of the 3, I liked the fact it told you approximately how long to sand/polish for, but there was a pityful amount of headlight sealer.

In 2nd position the Invision Kit from Repco. I bought it on special but it usually costs about $55. The Yellow X chemical (wtf is in it?!?!!?) that you are only allowed to leave on for about 10 seconds was amazing, it appeared to strip the yellow colour from the lens before my very eyes!!!! However i wasnt a fan of the 4 lots of wet and dry, partly because they'd chopped off the grit numbers off the back, but also because I prefered the sanding pads in both the Turtle and RainX Kit.

1st place goes to the RainX kit, middle off the pack for price, easy to follow instructions, plenty of sealer and polish. It has the same amount of lens lubricant as the Turtle Kit but you can just use water when it runs out.

Cheers

Simon

I used the Repco kit, comes with the UV sealant. Has everything you need, sandpaper, sanding block, masking tape, masking paper, cloth. The result speaks for itself. Was only $33 on special. Oh and it's not the Invision kit pictured in the post above, it's a repco self-branded one.

IMG-20140125-WA0003.jpg

IMG-20140125-WA0006.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

I used this one. Took me about an hour to do two cars in total and still plenty in the UV Protectant tin for another application to both.

2AQCAZ3.jpg

Hey mate, where did you get those Dupli-color restoration kits? I couldnt find them on ebay.

  • 6 months later...

I bought the meguiar kit, it did an okay job. I put alot of effort and care in to the restoration to try and get my moneys worth. In the end it was still a little frosted, but it looked to be from the inside. So far its been about 2 weeks, shall report when things start to degrade again.

  • 4 weeks later...

Seems like whichever kit is used the problem will return eventually. How about:

1 - Wet sand/polish

2 - spray with a clear coat

I don't see a downside with this?....Sure you would have to do a lot of masking but isn't it fairly permanent?

You would want to get a professional spraypainter to do it for you, most paint jobs I have done with a rattle can come out as a very slightly dimpled/uneven surface.. fine for a panel, but not what you want on a headlight.

I was over getting the hazy yellow headlights and re doing it every 6 months. In my experience the uv spray/sand kits will get cloudy again eventually and won't look good if you don't spray it in thin even coats

I used these guys:

http://www.uticolor.com.au/contact-nsw.html#Hills

Specifically the guy that does Blacktown

He did the usual sanding etc and then applied this sealant thing meant for paint. (He is a spray painter by trade) it's been over a year and the flakey or yellow stuff hasn't come back in the slightest.

He told me it would last and not one customer returned with the headlight yellowing and I was pretty skeptical.

I think it cost $60 a headlight or something along those lines and he was initially reluctant to come but as it was a small job but I pestered him. Nice guy, knows what he's doing.

I'm not exaggerate when I say it has not come back in the slightest. He's a magician.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...