Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heey i bougt a Bee-r from a well known trader here but i think it looks different then the regular bee-r limiters on pictures.

First thing what looks different is where the cables are coming out second is the cable which looks thinner

What do you guys think? Already mailed bee-r but they arent responding.

post-105921-0-48938500-1377863956_thumb.jpg

post-105921-0-43477700-1377863979_thumb.jpg

post-105921-0-78052300-1377863999_thumb.jpg

post-105921-0-88923300-1377864012_thumb.jpg

Edited by f5twister
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/431079-is-this-bee-r-revlimitter-fake/
Share on other sites

from the pics it def looks like a knock off. Way different to mine.

1. Those loop lines are way too long

2. no heat shrink on those loop lines

just as a start but thats just my opinion. I got mine directly from jap land but not aware of any changes to the model.

see attached

post-2127-0-87900400-1377898635_thumb.jpg

Lol doesnt harm engine as much as stock limiter as long as gain isnt on the big bangs and overuse it

But please stay ontopic

So what's the point in having it?

Use your foot and brain and buy something useful for your car.

Total waste of money!

So what's the point in having it?

Use your foot and brain and buy something useful for your car.

Total waste of money!

Agreed

It all looks the same as some photos on google...

bee-r-racing-rev-limiter-model-30175-2-l

And it also looks like there are slight changes between them.

so youre saying that everyone with launchcontrol is a ricer and wants to get noticed ?

First of all these limiters are safer for a engine you can install les revss and you have no fuell cutt duo to cutting the spark signal,

thats why unburnt fuel detonates in the elbow, but as i said it would be fine if you dont turn gain up to high which some people do because they like they bang bang indeed and yes high gain and overuse can damage the engine but i said that my plans where not to use a high gain, so please stop bashing the limiter now and my choice to buy one its my car and my money Mkay?

Edited by f5twister
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...