Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, just thought I'd see if anyone else has a similar thing going on with their climate control units.

When mine is set to 18 (lowest setting) it is cold (fair enough) but then one click up to 19 makes it hot (too hot to keep on for anything over a few minutes) and then just gets ridiculous goog any higher. Just seems there should be a few 'in between' settings rather than just going straight from cold to hot on one click...

Or is my climate control unit a bit messed up?

Thanks

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/431481-stagea-climate-control/
Share on other sites

What's the outside temp when this is happening?

Hasn't seemed to make any difference to inside temps but have been in ranges of temps from early morning low teens through to low 20's

Sounds like the inside air temp sensor is buggered, or the hose has dropped off it or is kinked. If you have a c34 I don't know how the sensor is mounted, or where it is. (M35 is under the steering wheel.)

18 degrees is cold air only in my car.

Mine is the same and my friends 34 is the same. I haven't tried it with the a/c on though.

Hmm ok maybe that's just the way it is then. Will have a look for any inside air temp sensors though. Can't see it being easy to find :/ is a c34 btw

Inside air temp sensor should be inside driverside panel under steerwheel. Look for a panel with a tiny grill carved into it. Once you see it you will understand what I mean

It should be under the rear screen defrost button,

View link:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/uploads/1302431973/gallery_76834_4268_57888.jpg

Mine doesn't do that. Mine gradually increases. Something going on there.

  • 2 weeks later...

On a side note to climate sensor's can anyone tell me where the outside temp sensor is ... (C34)

I dont understand i did a Flash on the car few months back and after that day till now the climate control system reads about 10°C hotter than what is really is outside little things like this bug me need to fix

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...