Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

I need your help. I'm in the middle of my build and wanting to know if anyone has used Tomei procam 270 with 10.8mm lift in/ex on their rb26/30 build?

It's the full mac daddy build and going into my pro drift car.

Bottom end is JE pistons 8.2:1, nitto I beam rods, Ross balancer, tomei pump etc etc.

I need to know if these cams will be beneficial for drifting where I am chasing mid to top end power (on off throttle a lot) also need to know if they mite be to laggy?

I think you can also get 260duration cams with the same lift?.any better??

Thanks in advance!

Will take a while to fill those cylinders - why did you go for such low compression?

Re the cams - have a read though the "what cams would you choose" thread below.

Will take a while to fill those cylinders - why did you go for such low compression?

I think you might know Joe Kyle? He said to stay with that standard compression ratio. I wanted more but he talked me down ? lol

I would've thought too big. For a drift car you want instant snappy power. With such low comp and big sticks I think you'll struggle to achieve that unless you've got a small super responsive turbo which then defeats the purpose of the big cams cause you're not going to achieve massive top end anyway! With that comp you will be able to push big boost into it but that will only make it a slug until it hits boost then you'll have a huge top end which wouldn't suit drifting.

I would think Poncams would be a lot more suited if you even bother with cams at all.

If it's not too late I'd bump comp up to 9.5:1 and get a mid sized turbo (presume single?) so you've got an engine that makes power straight away then a turbo that comes in not too soon after.

What power are you chasing?

Rb30et is 7.8 to1.

OK just looked up the RB30 PDF and that says RB30E is 8.2:1 and the RB30ET 7.1:1 (although the exact figure would depend on what twin cam head you were using) but whatever that's going back a few years - today you would want better than 9:1 or even more if using E85

OK just looked up the RB30 PDF and that says RB30E is 8.2:1 and the RB30ET 7.1:1 (although the exact figure would depend on what twin cam head you were using) but whatever that's going back a few years - today you would want better than 9:1 or even more if using E85

sorry I wasnt clear, that is with the sohc head it is 7.8:1 .

I would've thought too big. For a drift car you want instant snappy power. With such low comp and big sticks I think you'll struggle to achieve that unless you've got a small super responsive turbo which then defeats the purpose of the big cams cause you're not going to achieve massive top end anyway! With that comp you will be able to push big boost into it but that will only make it a slug until it hits boost then you'll have a huge top end which wouldn't suit drifting.

I would think Poncams would be a lot more suited if you even bother with cams at all.

If it's not too late I'd bump comp up to 9.5:1 and get a mid sized turbo (presume single?) so you've got an engine that makes power straight away then a turbo that comes in not too soon after.

What power are you chasing?

ok I've got some 260 10.25 inlet and 270 10.8mm ex, talked to a few tuners who suggested that duration. Also Ive got JE pistons so i think they only come in 8.2:1 or 9.1? Too late anyhow they've been ordered :wacko: Will post results when all together :bunny:

Too late then!

The lower comp should give you a huge top end when you chase it later on (with big boost) I just hope it does the job for you in the meantime.

Maybe you can just hold it at 6000 rpm minimum with some mad anti lag system and it'll be perfect!

Too late then!

The lower comp should give you a huge top end when you chase it later on (with big boost) I just hope it does the job for you in the meantime.

Maybe you can just hold it at 6000 rpm minimum with some mad anti lag system and it'll be perfect!

Yer thanks mate, I'll post up a video when it runs, let you be the judge :)

  • 10 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Yer thanks mate, I'll post up a video when it runs, let you be the judge :)

what happened with the info/vids, everytime I get interested in something it just stops, I must be a JINKS :(

  • 2 years later...

Old thread! Sorry boys been a while since I have been in the threads. For those wanting to know on results which may help them on their build etc etc

Car made 550Kw on e85 @ 21psi on A Holset Turbo.

Specs;

26Head (cams stated previously)

Nitto I Beam & JE Pistons

ID2000s with e85

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Yes that’s what im trying to decide. Should I do stock gtt box or enclosed or open pod. 
    • Also, I note OP is in Melbourne, which begs the question... are you aware of how illegal your car will be with a turbo, and intercooler and any sort of filter change? I don't know how you can get past the "2 intake mods" "rule" that seems to exist in Vic. Fully engineered might or might not get you there.
    • If you have a turbo... then the ducting holes I used to feed the pod are not available because your intercooler likely uses them. If you have an intercooler, your IAT's are going to be goverened by how good your intercooler setup is. I'm yet to really see anyone check IAT with a snorkel/boxed pod/proper CAI versus and unshielded pod. It would be interesting! But I suspect that the differences would not be so noticeable as if you were N/A as the intercooler is where the air is being cooled.. and out in front where the FMIC would be is a pretty good spot for it.. When I was turbo I pushed the stock GTT box as far as I could and made some pretty good power out of it, and noticed on the street I never made the same power/boost. Then I did a before and after run with a pod filter versus the box and picked up about 9PSI from the same boost duty cycle and about 50KW instantly. I never ran the stock box again, and recently removed it for my N/A setup. The box is restrictive to a degree - Even with the V8 setup I noticed I picked up power by removing the box completely, so punching holes from the bottom of it to get air from the passenger guard *helps* but the most effective one in my case was simply having the ducts, a pod, and no box around it. In my experience, *more* air was better than cold air. The air (with ducts) will be cooled off as you start moving, and especially if you start moving fast (a race track). It actually moves around quite a bit as you can see.  
    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
×
×
  • Create New...