Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here is a quick way that I use to change the color of a car, it is reasonably simple, and allows you to change to almost any color combination.

lowering_1.jpg

First of all, open the picture you want to change color, create a layer to work with then use the Polygon laso tool, and zoom right in on your image so you can get reasonable detail when selecting the outline of the car.

color1.jpg

Use the tool to select the whole car. then fill that layer with the color you wish to use.

color2.jpg

With the color layer selected, use different blending modes to get different effects and colors, for the one below, I used the Color Blending mode.

color3.jpg

Once you are happy with the color, use the eraser tool to erase the color from the parts that arent part of the duco, such as windows, decals, lights etc..

color4.jpg

And thats about it! If you save this with the layers (as a .psd or similar) you can come back, and simply refil the color layer with a different color and always be able to change the color on the car no worries.

Once you work out the best way it works for you, you can use the same concept to tint windows, lights, wheels etc..

color5.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4327-tutorial-change-the-color-of-a-car/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ahh.. Mr Miagi..

It can be done with this method, just need to use multiple layers, use basecoat of white/ light silver, and experiment with different blending modes..

Its not easy doing it that way, but can be done.. lol.. I'll leave that tutorial up to you ;)

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

the trick is to start with a colour that is a parent of the colour you want to tint it in...

in this example the starting car is white, which is composed of Red, Green and Blue, therefore Yellow (combination of green and blue) is also in white. If you started with say a red car, yellow isn't possible.

To overcome it, what you do is make a selection of the tint area (easy way is to go to the tint layer, and right click on the layer in the layer palette, then select layer transparency, then click on the original layer) and then shift the hue till you come to a colour that contains the colour you want to change it to.

Then you colour blend it as per usual.

never use black coz you can't shift black to anything :(

If you wanna recolour a black car you need to apply a white screen onto the car, invert the highlights and then tint. (waaaay too much trouble for little effect, jus go get a pic of a white car)

if you wanna cheat a bit, then jus turn the opacity down to about 90% and leave the layer on normal... it'll give it a semi solid tint, and the highlights will be visible too... this is a slightly obvious way tho.

Umm..yeah, thats one way to do it..

I'd use the quick mask mode where you can paint the edges of the car better (not as hard) and you can use the airbrush to create different effects in combo with the eraser. Then its not so on/off as painting directly the shape over the top and you get overall a better result. You can always use the alpha channels as well.

Then once you have the selection I prefer to use the hue/saturation to dial up the colour i want. Use "desaturate" to kill the colour and allow you to work with the grey (undercoat style). If you want to get a specific colour you create a flat colour swatch over part of the car and twiddle the hue/sat to match. I've found that gives better results.

lol i was thinkin of that but cbf explainin it... i hate how i can never explain to sum1 sumthing I know, even though its so clear in my mind. I'm gettin old...

  • 1 month later...

instead of lasso work with quick mask then all u do is paint the area u want selected (u can move the pic etc) and then apply the quick mask to the image, and you end up with an antialiased (or hard edged) perfect selection.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...