Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive posted a few bits and pieces on Vettes before and there wasnt much love :)

But surely someone (i know you dont Rezz ;) ) else fancies one of these beauties with std 11.9 @115mph performance from an all alloy 405hp, quad cam 32 valve 5.7L. Shame that they still go for US$30,000, this example is actually US$38,000 (94 model ZR1) :aroused:

pic8.jpg

pic12.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43613-anyone-for-some-yankee-iron/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The ZR1 has always been one of my favourite cars of all time.

This was the early 90's - only the Germans, Italians and Japanese had mastered the art of the Quad Cam 32 valve v8. These guys lost the war apparently :)

The 'normal' Corvette at the time was the old L98 OHV V8 - the precursor to the LS1 V8 we seen in the Commodore today.

The current 'normal' Corvette motor is the LT1. The ZR1 motor is the LT5.

I think I'm correct there... once you've actually 'experienced' a Corvette, you realise that the C4 chassis is from 1984 and an 'old' car like the 1989 R32 Skyline makes it look antiquated. Like the Lotus Esprit it's an ancient car in design but there's something very modern, almost timeless about it.

The LT5 32valve V8 motor had similar sorts of problems we see in the current LS1 but think of a motor that's twice as complex but a decade ago!

In the end, the old OHV pushrod went over the 280kW the 32v valve motor could produce so there seemed no point to it.

It does however still live in offshore racing boats - the LT5 was developed by Mercury Marine and Lotus so they sold them at quite high prices to rice race boat owners.

I don't think there's more than 6 - 7 - 8,000 ZR-1 Corvettes?

At $60,000 - $70,000 a pop when that was a lot of money, there weren't that many takers since it looked so much like a 'normal' Corvette.

T.

Me thinks back to the Beyond 2000 story i saw back in 1989 on the ZR1...was even the same colour, but early LT5s only had 385hp.... and the expense of the LT5 and the added width spelt the death of the motor at the end of '94 (there may have been a few 95 models, but i think they ended production in '94)

Never heard about any probs with the LT5 engine though, i use to get a monthly mag called Corvette Fever, and also Road & Track, never read about any engine probs. The sad thing is the Corvette is still very typical US sports car... that said id much rather one then similar year model Porsche :)

Roy, welcome to yesterday :)

:jk:

corvetts r some mean cars; was going to get a c4 l98 but ended up getting the r33; I alot of yankee have done custum turbo jobs to tehre vette and push out some awsome hp :drooling:

ohh yeah and by the way Zr1 corvette sell for around 30k US; also u have the calleaway which was a LT5 with twin turbo (america boys have push out around 450rwhp from just exhaust, air filter and the rest stock)

My favourite is the 1963 - 1967 split window Corvette Stingray - the Bill Mitchell creation. I think it'll be shite to drive but I'm not talking about that/

Every generation of Corvette has it's chief designer. This 4 year life cycle Corvette is my favourite.

I don't like the 1968 - 1982 model.

T.

Yeh Duntov tried to bring the Vette up to European standards, it was an improvement but still fell short.

Im with you on the 63-67 Vettes, though i dont think i could ever justify the expense of the original 63 split window over the later 65 etc models, and the L88 alloy head 425hp 427 big block ran 11s, and with modern rubber they have been shown to run 10s.

For a 60s model car they were optioned with fuel injected 327 chevs, had std fibreglass body and 4 wheel discs....not a bad thing for their day.... although 59 Vettes are so damn sexy as well!

Powerball is worth some serious coin this week :)

.... cruising around some yank sites, for the money i have spent on my R32 GTST, i could have a ruby red 6spd coupe with FX3 suspension and LT1 engine. Do cooling off periods last 4 years?.. id like to take my car and the all its bolt ons back for a full refund.

corvettes have a great engine note it always brings a smile to my face when i hear someone give one a kick in the nads.

there is one that i see almost daily around my area its jet black but he must have a dud car i always seem him broken down somewhere.

maybe a bit OT, but does anyone have any info on the new release batch of Shelby Mustangs? If ever I had a dream car, that would be it. It oozes oldschool style and tenacity.

.... cruising around some yank sites, for the money i have spent on my R32 GTST, i could have a ruby red 6spd coupe with FX3 suspension and LT1 engine. Do cooling off periods last 4 years?.. id like to take my car and the all its bolt ons back for a full refund.

Roy, sounds like u have been doing what i have been doing :) only problem with import a 89+ vette is you have to get it under the new import laws and im not sure anyone can do it yet; I am going to wait 2years before i import one as the 88/89 model vette didnt have the 6spd or the lt1

It just dawned on me recently , i love my R32, but its not my dream car, and the money that Vettes are going for.... well food for thought.

I wasnt too keen on the 15 year rule, though late 89 Vettes did come out with the ZF 6spd and L98, which id actually prefer as they are cheaper, and the LT1 is still no powerhouse. My main gripe would be i prefer the later model interior :) Hadnt thought too much about the compliancing and legislation changes....surely Crossover Conversions, or a few of the other big Vette/Camaro/Saleen places in either Canberra or Queensland can compliance and do the RHD conversion?

As for the Mustang...Ive seen some bits and pieces on it, also recently saw an article on what they are calling the GTR, the 40h Anniversary one.

6 spd T56 box, Brembo brakes, 330 kws and 20" wheels, and plenty of race bits and pieces to give it a pseudo race feel, ala GT3 Porsche

I like this piece of shit:

http://www.thecarplace.com/bullitt.htm

You know that a mildly modded Skyline would knock it into the next suburb in every area dynamically. But that isn't the point is it?

I don't mind the '68 Fastback in the original "Bullitt" - I might just dig out my DVD right now :)

T.

retro Bullet Mustang....I thinlk id rather the original 68 Fastback. (or someone throw me the keys to a GT40 if we are talking Fords)

Dynamically they may not be the greatest cars form the factory, but like any car with the right shock/spring, brake and breathing upgrades they will hammer along rather nicely.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
×
×
  • Create New...