Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, this is the first rb30det ive tridd to build. Its a fairly basic one. Stock bottom end with acl bearings, standard rb30 rods and pistons which are in good order. Arp head studs. 1.3mm headgasket. and rb25det head which had been cleaned up etc. Went to to compressio test. It had no extractors, intake on and no spark plugs in any of the cylinders prstty bare and im getting about 100psi all over roughly. B

Just did the test with battery on starter motor etc any help much appreciated!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/436963-compression-help/
Share on other sites

Sounds like my engine. Unless you're going to pull it apart and put in some high compression pistons you may as well carry on and test it again when its been run. Thinner headgasket would help but will not make a significant difference. My compressions are all around 120 and I am making 314AWKW with a 3540R. PM me your no and I'll give you a ring if you want.

absolutely don't worry about the compression until the rings are bedded in. and for what it's worth the motor should be warm too, as well as a healthy battery (which they normally aren't by the time a motor's been pulled out, rebuilt, and put back in)

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...