Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This thing was making better power before the ECU changed and everything else is the same except now the exhaust is better so clearly the issue is in the ECU where it be the settings or simple the tune

Clear some space in your inbox, I too tried sending you a PM

Yeh it was making better power at lower boost too (286rwkw @18-16psi) but it does drive much smoother now esp in low rpms before boost and noticeably more power/torque in low rpms too. Now 280rwkw @22-18psi it makes less power with a better exhaust and supposedly better ecu; so it can only be one thing wrong with the system, (not the ecu) need I say it, and yes dynos do read different too.

I will re visit them to get the power loss at downshifts sorted, have cleared my inbox, please try sending pm now, cheers

16kw difference? lets say 5kw could be any of the common variables that affect power on any given day..you're looking at a 11kw difference, this could be the difference in 1 or 2 degrees timing at wide open throttle.

the default Powerfc accelerate injector settings can richen up mixtures alot when you press the go pedal, they may have only been tuning wide open throttle? IMO full range torque is better than top end power any day of the week...especially on the street.

Have you thought about me while buying lube and condoms lately?

Yes, I bought the strawberry/banana flavored ones since your just so juicy. nohomo.

Anyways back on topic :ninja:

My issue was the CAS, but only because the engine got so hot to the point the block warped and the plastics around it melted. Otherwise not sure if its a usual wear and tear item

You can't 100% trust a dyno number

It's how it drives and the speed it pulls at the quarter mile is accurate

I went to latest rigoli dyno day and made 260kw was tune the week before at Unigroup 266kw

Seen a turbo civic the had a dyno sheet on the window tune by Jem and made 280 odd kw on rigolis dyno only made 224kw go figure

  • Like 1

By the looks of it, Its just bolted onto stock exhaust manifold and externally gated off rear housing. So the question is how much factory exhaust manifold can flow, and my evaluation result says 280rwkws on P98 unless excessive amount of boost.

The compressor design with huge impeller radius and plus antisurge housing makes it very un-efficient unless huge amount of boost given. In which you can not run those boost levels with a 65mm / 56mm turbine in a .63 rear.

My advise is get a proper exhaust manifold, a .82 turbine housing, a 50mm external gate. Then run heaps of boost.

My car made 280rwkw at 18psi, not 22psi, by the time it made the power after 7k rpms thats how much the boost had dropped. Will an ebc hold consistent 22psi till 7k rpms? Power might go up then but by how much is anybodys guess.

Ebc will only help to extent but if there's is too much backpressure blowing the gate open at high rpm

It's going to drop boost no matter also when the turbos out of flow it will drop but I doubt the turbos maxxed as my mate made 360kw with a 5558 on e85 sr20

A smaller wastegate may also help as there won't be as much pressure blowing on it as it's physically smaller

But those are only bandaid fixes which might only help slighty

But a larger rear housing and proper manifold is a proper fix if you want 300kw plus

I can see boost started to tapper as soon as peek was reached.

This can happen because the compressor is inefficient to feed the engine with that much of Air at given RPMs.

Or the exhaust manifold pressure is too high that blows the gate open. And when it has an external gate it means the EMP is very high.

Taken example given by Hy_RPM then it will be more likely that the turbine end is maxed.

There isn't a real lot of point of trying to hold the gate shut in this situations as it will makes the engine wants to pin. So you end up running higher boost on less timing and not alot of gain. Of course you can cure it with E85 or Q16 that marks your Ign timing closer to its peek torque output. Run a smaller gate will only increase EGT, in situations like this is very wrong.

Some thing like this is a perfectly balanced setup between induction and discharge. It is running an 38mm internal gate also:

ss2boost.jpg

SR is 4cyc engine with 8.5 compression. So it won't be copping with back pressure issues as what RB engines gets, generally makes a lot more power in a smaller turbine housing. So a .82 turbine will definitely make some changes to boost curve, and lot more power.

Yeah but your comparing yours to different setups

The other guy made the extra power from e85 and more boost and he has a more free flowing manifold and inlet plenum so can make use of the extra boost aswell

Your will be restricted by boost now as your on 98 so more boost will just ping

But waste your money elsewhere up to you

Tuner has already guided you in the right direction

There's a restriction somewhere but the cat and exhaust wasn't it as it didn't gain much once you changed them

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...