Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A guy with PT5558 on R34 neo made 372rwkw @26psi, the only difference- he had e85, top mount ex manifold and ffp. Mick O made 335kw on stock manifold btw...

^^

In this case the OP6 high flow made more power on less boobst :P

Like mentioned earlier, higher octane fuel will allow you to run timing that is closer to the optimum degree.

Or you can also enlarge the exhaust side turbine wheel that has similar effect to an larger rear housing. This case a larger housing would be the cheaper way to get more power.

What I was tryin to say is I dont think the turbo is a limitation itself since 372kw and 360kw was made with the same turbo on a neo and an sr (both e85) respectively, as posted by the guy above. And mick O did 335kw on stock mani, so have many others gone over 300 on stock mani. Just my opinion

What I was tryin to say is I dont think the turbo is a limitation itself since 372kw and 360kw was made with the same turbo on a neo and an sr (both e85) respectively, as posted by the guy above. And mick O did 335kw on stock mani, so have many others gone over 300 on stock mani. Just my opinion

Well SR20det in .63 is equivalent to an RB on something like a .84. That R34 has much better hot side setup then yours and on E85.

Like mentioned earlier, Tuning P98 with a tinny rear housing will need to have detonation in mind, in which you will have to back off timing from the optimum ignition angle to avoid pinning. You have less of this issue tuning E85 fuel, that allows you to fire spark closer or at the crank angle for optimum engine output.

Or you can just run E85, which should boost up 40KWs in power getting you over the 300rwkws mark on the same boost level.

Edit:

Add in one more piece of information: Garrett GT30's turbine is in 60in / 55ex. The tip height and exducer area determines the total capacity of discharging, so technically this turbine does not have much better capacity to a GT30 turbine.

How much more power do you think a 0.82 housing will give me? 10kw? Not worth the removal/fabrication of gate/ labor again I think.

Yavuz suggested cams and also an ebc to keep boost up. Any guesses as to how much I will gain with an ebc holding boost well. 280rwkw was made on 18psi not 22.

If it was CAS, a tuner like Yavuz or even Mark should have been able to pick it up straight away and inform me? Or tested a different one. Well changing the exhaust definitely did feel a noticeable gain on the road from driving feel (without touch up tune), after the touch up tune it felt a lot lighter and torqueyer down low, so definitely the exhaust had some restriction. One strange thing now 100km/h in 5th is @2600rpms, before exhaust/touch up tune 100km/h was at 3000rpms...

Cams in a rb as tested by Tao only gain very little but shift power band higher

Where as you where making 200kw by 4000rpm it will proberly be 150kw and full boost will be later as well so won't be good for street and be felt at the track only

You should have ran your nistune tuned by Jem with 287kw on Unigroup dyno and seen where it was at to compare but does it feel quicker than before or the same ?

Cams in a rb as tested by Tao only gain very little but shift power band higher

Where as you where making 200kw by 4000rpm it will proberly be 150kw and full boost will be later as well so won't be good for street and be felt at the track only

You should have ran your nistune tuned by Jem with 287kw on Unigroup dyno and seen where it was at to compare but does it feel quicker than before or the same ?

You can't establish anything from that test, as it lost vct. And you are guessing wildly.

There are results of cams picking up power everywhere, for example Matt from Nistune's r34.

It doesn't feel quicker, much less the same, maybe pulls a wee bit harder in 3rd/4th and a lot better under 3000rpms - more light/torquey down low, this is the area that wasn't tuned well with Nistune. Also cold starts and idle is much smoother and like factory now, before was rough and I had to crank twice/push gas pedal to start.

It doesn't feel quicker, much less the same, maybe pulls a wee bit harder in 3rd/4th and a lot better under 3000rpms - more light/torquey down low, this is the area that wasn't tuned well with Nistune. Also cold starts and idle is much smoother and like factory now, before was rough and I had to crank twice/push gas pedal to start.

That's a shame that your Nistune wasn't tuned correctly. Don't blame the ecu.

It would have to be the easiest ecu to get cold start and idling nice with.

That makes no sense.

Diff ratio is the same. Revs the same.

More revs needed before for same power/speed looks like it? Remember its a freer exhaust now, so boosts quicker and makes more power at least 400rpms earlier. And more timing been added across the rpm scale. And yeh they didn't tune the Nistune correctly, not even after the second time.

More revs needed before for same power/speed looks like it? Remember its a freer exhaust now, so boosts quicker and makes more power at least 400rpms earlier. And more timing been added across the rpm scale. And yeh they didn't tune the Nistune correctly, not even after the second time.

That doesn't make any sense. If you had 1000hp it should still sit on the same rpm at 100km/h.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...so a "development" here aswell The swap is "done" and car went "test drive" BUT it seems the clutch(maybe gearbox?) is a little bit sad? I bought this clutch kit https://justjap.com/products/xtreme-heavy-duty-organic-clutch-flywheel-kit-nissan-skyline-r31-r32-r33-push-type "Problem" is that the first gear is hard to put into and it seems that the clutch is not disengaged. It was not the problem with the old clutch...(or like sometime the first gear would not get as easy specialy when the fluid was cold) So? Can it be like...bad "install" or is the clutch wrong ((it should not have been) i done research to get the right one) Or is this "normal" with new clutch and needs to be break in? 
    • @Duncan I can try  and thanks i did not thought about VIN and part numbers for 33/34. @GTSBoy yeah it looks like iam gonna do that  
    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
×
×
  • Create New...