Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Tyres diff all same, stock ecu and nistune I was doing 100km/h in 5th at 3000rpms, PFC now I'm doing 2600rpms -normal motorway cruising. And no gay 22" rims, running 18" RAYs wheels

so how do I know what tyres you have............

If it's 2600 vs 3000, then at 7000 indicated it should be really revving to 8000, if the error remains linear.

The tacho (whether in the ECU or at the tacho itself) is a pulse counter. There is no "voltage" to get wrong. If it's counting pulse wrongly at the ECU, then that doesn't bode well for all sorts of things. After all....the whole point of the ECU is to know exactly how fast the engine is turning over, no?

I would be looking into this problem as a matter of some concern. Do not sweep under the carpet.

i guess i offered that as a way he could check his speedo/rpm gauge calibration...what are you the f**kin forum police?

Settle down Bro! Are you having a bad day?

I guess I didn't guess that by your post.

Going on to the dyno to check it would be an option,, as would using an automotive multimeter with tacho function to compare stock gauge (you could buy a multimeter instead of paying for the dyno hire)

But that's not really the issue. The fact that it changed by only changing ecu implies to me that there might be a problem.

my speedo is currently having problems...i fix it by bashing it(not recommended..breaks windscreen).....mine doesn't like going above 60km/h until its warmed up...but i'm curious as to wether its his RPM or speedo that is incorrect....the speedo drive/sender is off the gearbox right? and the rpm is signal. It could be just a coincidence that it happened when ecu's changed?

I'm not guessing wildly

Are you a mechanic superben ?

Do you even work on cars your self or just pay people to do the work

Is has been proven time and time again larger cams than std always shift the powerband higher on any car

Yes you will gain power up top but is it worth the loss down low which is up to owner and driving style choice and purpose

Yes you can get the manifold runners tapped and check the egt and engine backpressure under load on the dyno to confirm but the price to get that all done you could have gone to a new rear housing but do as you like it's your money and time

I'm not guessing wildly

Are you a mechanic superben ?

Do you even work on cars your self or just pay people to do the work

Is has been proven time and time again larger cams than std always shift the powerband higher on any car

Yes you will gain power up top but is it worth the loss down low which is up to owner and driving style choice and purpose

Yes you can get the manifold runners tapped and check the egt and engine backpressure under load on the dyno to confirm but the price to get that all done you could have gone to a new rear housing but do as you like it's your money and time

Yes I do ALL of the work on my car . Amongst other things I wired up the ls coils, put the rb30 bottom end in, do all tuning and recently put some type b cams in. Not that that is particularly relevant.

You are guessing as to how much the power band will shift. Typically better cams will have more lift which will create more flow all over and therfore increase power in all parts of the Rev range, making the shift to the right not as bad as you would imagine.

Have you put in cams? Not that I care.

Yes I've replaced plenty of cams and a mechanic by trade so work on cars day in day out

I ve driven a few cars before and after performance cams are fitted and yes you won't notice the power loss if you have a heavy foot and drive in the powerband of the new cams everyday but most people just give it a squirt here and there and ain't alway revving above 4000rpm

dailying it and cruising will be where you feel and notice the power loss downlow between std cams and performace cams

Ok. As per any mod it comes down to personal situation and preference.

Just to clarify it is the duration that shifts the power band.

The extra lift increases flow all over.

I was saying you were guessing at the 50kw loss at 4000rpm. I wasn't arguing the potential of a loss somewhere.

I also changed turbo, and put on water injection, at the same time as the cams so can't make a direct comparison on the loss, but for reference from an older thread

my car has a different turbo setup but thought i would gilve ,my 2 cents,

found with stock cams my car was making 321awkw and then with poncams 260 9.15's went up to 344awkw, boost was came on sooner with more midrange and topend torque/power, was quite happy with the results,

will be good to see the setups you guys have and see the differences in power with/without cams,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...