Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Fellas,

Holinger 6 Speed Sequential Gearbox Nissan RB26 is fitted to my 180SX Race Car Gear will bolt up to RB Engines

Includes:

Strain gauge shifter for flat shifts

Gear indicator Display

This gearbox is practically brand new I've done 3 passes at WSID then the car has been in storage for awhile , currently gearbox is still in the car can easily be arranged to be pulled out ready to go

Priced to sell at $23.000

Serious buyers only!!

Below is information taken from Holinger website at http://www.holinger.com.au/gtr.php

Sequential shift dog-change gearbox designed for use in the R32 and R33 Nissan Skyline GTR

The gearbox is designed to bolt directly to the Nissan RB Series engine at the front and standard Nissan R32/R33 transfer case at the rear.

These transmissions are used with great success in cars with more than 1000hp in drag racing applications.

All gears are removable from shafts with an extensive range of ratios available.

Gear change is performed by using the standard Nissan gear lever and mechanism.

The gear lever is pulled back for up changes and pushed forward for down changes.

Clutch splines are normally 1 1/8" x 26, 24/48DP, 30 deg P.A., but can be ordered with standard Nissan splines.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444520-holinger-sequential-gearbox/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSP male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSP reducing bush?
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...