Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I was putting my tyres back on last night and was shocked to notice pretty severe cracks/cuts on one of them - only to find more damaged tyres soon after. Two of the tyres have deep cracks (front right and rear left) and one has less severe ones (rear right). See photos below.

These are good quality tyres, Goodyear F1 Asymmetric 2 in 235/45R17, manufactured in late 2011. I bought and installed them new in Jan 2013, and they have only about 15,000 kms on them.

I'm running BC BR coilovers and stock 17" R34 GTT wheels with 20mm spacers. I've checked all clearances several times and can't see where it could rub, certainly not on the inside. If only the fronts or the rears were affected it would make more sense, but that's not the case either.

What could be causing this? Do these look like a bad batch/compound or more like mechanical tears?

Thanks heaps.

Front right:

14911070992_4a012b229b_z.jpg

14888439566_4762c28f2f_z.jpg

14888439436_b43286287a_z.jpg


Rear left:

14911428395_3ecb5d87aa_z.jpg

14724820448_528f8aab4f_z.jpg

Rear right:

14908364011_6d9512f056_z.jpg

This might be why Tirerack.com were getting rid of them for $100 each earlier this year. I have a set of same from the same 2011 batch on my car at the moment. I haven't noticed any sidewall cracks like that, but after 7000km they are nearly stuffed, and they are not a very good tyre anyway, so I will declare them well rid of when I replace them soon.

  • Like 1

The way most of the cuts appear suggests that its a tyre problem. If they were old tyres that had been sitting in the sun it would make more sense but could just be a bad batch as suggested

It doesnt really suggest a rub on something. I had tyres rubbing on a bit of the chassis that was pressed together and had a small section of flat steel sticking out. The fronts were just touching enough to wear out where the sidewall and tread met. Ended up costing me a set of otherwise great tyres. So I know what it should look like if it was rubbing. Because yours dont show a leading or trailing edge of a rub and they are just cuts then it looks like tyre defect to me. Or someone without much skill has tried to slash your tyres?

Talk to Taleb Tyres on here about it, they might have an idea and can sort out some new rubber for you if you dont have a trusted tyre shop you usually use. I got my Yokohamas for the rear from them and they have been great so far. My old Kumho KU31's were from there as well, also really good street tyres for the price

  • Like 1

Thanks heaps guys!

I have contacted the original shop, let's see what they say.

It's a real shame, I like these tyres, they're a good all-rounder with decent grip in dry and wet, and low wear...

Oh well more money into the pit :/

Seriously - gutters, on the inner sidewall? Only if you park on the footpath, with the outer wheel in the gutter.

Seriously - driveway? Ramp gutter/driveway? Drain pipes that poke out from said things....

Edited for, Mini roundabouts that you drive over, speed bumps, drains next to gutters, wooden bridges, section bridges, glass, nails, screws, car parts, children.

But they were made in 2011, so would be deteriorating and they need replacing regardless. The first time i spoke to my tyre guy, he told me never to use tyres that are over 3yrs old.

Edited by Stagea97

Edited for, Mini roundabouts that you drive over, speed bumps, drains next to gutters, glass, nails, screws, car parts, children.

To be fair, none of those things should ever be driven over in a Skyline. Mazda 3, yes. Astra, yes. Any other FWD nugget shopping/kid carrier, yes. Skylines should go around.

I'm pretty sure that the cracks on these tyres are not from mechanical contact with anything. I try to avoid parking on the footpath with the outer tyres in the gutter ;)

I've been in touch with the tyre shop and they reckon one possibility is running too low pressures. Which would suck, since I've been following the tyre placard info to a tee at all times (32 psi).

See how we go.

  • 4 weeks later...

Just to close this one off, I have replaced these tyres with a new set of exactly the same brand and size.

I sent the previous set back for inspection and they had several people look at them, it was deemed premature sidewall failure due to too low pressure.

I just wish that someone had told me what PSI to run them at when I bought the set but oh well, live and learn. A nice thousand dollar mistake.

For reference the recommendation is 38-40 PSI for these tyres - my Jap and Aus tyre placards both say 32 PSI for the exact same size tyre...

I wouldnt have thought 32psi would cause any damage at all, and should definitely be fine if you're running the factory diameter rims. I'm skeptical. Where does the 38-40 psi recommendation come from? Is there anything written on the sidewalls WRT pressure? What did the shop that fitted them pump them up to?

I wouldnt have thought 32psi would cause any damage at all, and should definitely be fine if you're running the factory diameter rims. I'm skeptical. Where does the 38-40 psi recommendation come from? Is there anything written on the sidewalls WRT pressure? What did the shop that fitted them pump them up to?

Well the official line is that low pressure combined with non-stock camber is the cause. These tyres were ordered online from Sydney and put on by a separate shop in Melbourne (probably originally inflated to >32psi), and I maintained the pressure at 32psi since.

There is nothing on the sidewall to indicate minimum recommended pressure, only maximum. I raised this with the seller also to no avail.

Yuh, they shouldn't suffer at 32 psi in any way shape or form except that the handling won't be as good.

Interesting. So my warranty claim was denied due to the 'low pressure' and 'non-standard camber', I wonder if I could refer this issue to anybody else? Manufacturer? I obviously don't have the damaged tyres anymore so it's getting a bit complicated..

Walk away. File it in the lessons learned basket.

Also, when I said that they "won't suffer" it is actually possible that they might wear out a little faster, particularly near the edges, if the pressure is a little low. 32 is probably not low enough for that to occur.

32 is definitely not high enough for sustained high speed driving though. The tyres will get hotter and wear out faster that way for sure. Difference might not be great, but it will be there. And it won't feel as good anyway - so best avoided.

  • Like 1

You could;

- Get a written statement from a recognised expert (i guess that means a mechanic?) saying that the tyres were not "fit for purpose" (assuming that is the case)

- Ring Fair Trading, or whatever the equivalent department is called in your state, for advice on how to proceed to get a refund.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...