Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

my mate has gone 4 times to epa and cant pass,  i got defected for everything you can think about, but never court.

Well... it sounds to me like your mate has only offended ONCE... he is just taking awhile to clear his first round of defects. And sounds like you've only been done once too. All I am saying is that I got defected TWICE (thw two offences were a year apart) by the RTA/EPA... for EXACTLY the same thing... and the second time the EPA took me to court... that is all!

Supra - Lawyer fees were about the same... so all up i think i was let off VERY lightly! :cheers:

I used to have a trust sr on the car... VERY loud... heheh... i loved it!! it sounded so damn tough!!!

yeah... i think i just had some bad luck... first one was on a sunday night - wetherill park... pulled over by an undercover cop car... had to follow them to the rta/epz set up... second time was early sunday morning... was at harrys for a pie... they had an 'rbt' setup with the rta/epa setup behind... ahh well!! i'm just glad its all over! :rofl:

Well... it sounds to me like your mate has only offended ONCE... he is just taking awhile to clear his first round of defects.  And sounds like you've only been done once too.  All I am saying is that I got defected TWICE (thw two offences were a year apart) by the RTA/EPA... for EXACTLY the same thing... and the second time the EPA took me to court... that is all!

Supra - Lawyer fees were about the same... so all up i think i was let off VERY lightly! :D

Hi Moanie, can you please tell us more about what happened....

How did the know it was EXACTLY the same?

Did they mark the parts?

Take pictures?

I mean you could have had say a HKS exhaust on the first time and a Trust exhaust the second time. They're not the EXACTLY same. For all you know one may be illegal and another legal.

How did they get around that?

Was your car complied under the old or new system?

If it was complied under the old system it didn't have to have a stock standard exhauts on it to be leagally complied. How did they get around that?

When you took it back the first time for inspection, did they mark the parts then?

Or take pictures? I mean they may have approved a non standard exhaust and then busted you for something that they approved. How did they get around that?

How long did you have between the time you were busted and the time you had to take it for inspection?

Did they impound the car in between?

Did you have time to remove the offending parts?

Would they have known if you did?

We are all facing this kind of stuff and the more info we have the better we can defend ourselves.

We are all facing this kind of stuff and the more info we have the better we can defend ourselves.

Wow! so many questions! and i guess thats the reason i started this thread... just to make people aware... cause i sure as hell wouldn't have changed everything back if i'd known how bad it could be the second time!

In answer to your questions:

Both times i got defected, I had the same epa guy go over my car (i think theres only one!) He is the same guy that also passed my car for its defects. Him remembering me didn't help! He remembered me getting defected a first time... even remember the location and the approx date... and he also remembered me clearing the defects... including exactly what i had done... he asked me why i'd changed it all back when it was legal! During the first lot of defects, they took pics of my car - the exhaust and the exposed pod.... during the second lot of defects they did the same thing. They'd have records of all these pics. As for the parts being EXACTLY the same... i don't think that matters... what mattered was my car was caught with an illegal pod filter, and the sound levels of my exhaust were over the legal limit (90db @ 4800rpm) for a second time. What they DID know was that i had been caught once... I'd made the necessary changes to fix the problems, and then I deliberately went and changed things back and made them illegal again.

Was your car complied under the old or new system?

If it was complied under the old system it didn't have to have a stock standard exhauts on it to be leagally complied.  How did they get around that?

My car was complied in october 2002... down in melbourne... sorry... don't know anything about what laws it was complied under... what i do know was it was complied with the exposed pod and with the loud exhaust. They didn't look into who complied the car.... and me saying that i'd gotten the car as is, even complied as is, didn't hold any weight.

When you took it back the first time for inspection, did they mark the parts then?  Or take pictures?  I mean they may have approved a non standard exhaust and then busted you for something that they approved.  How did they get around that?

No marking of parts when they pass the car... they just check to see that i've replaced the pod with a stock airbox and that my exhuast is under the legal limit. I should also clarify that it was completely my fault! I was defected the first time, and changed everything to be legal, then went and passed then car, and then changed everything back. so when they caught me the second time, the car was exactly as it was when i was caught the first time. So no, they were not then defecting me on a car that was epa compliant.

How long did you have between the time you were busted and the time you had to take it for inspection?

Did they impound the car in between?

Did you have time to remove the offending parts?

Would they have known if you did?

Umm... they gave me a little while... i think almost a month.. i was also able to call the epa to get this time extended. I had to pass an emmissions test as well, which took quite a few gos to pass, and took me almost 3 months to get through... out of everything... thats the one test you can't fudge, or dodge your way around.

The car was not impounded inbetween all this... i was still driving around... i didn't have a defect sticker either...

Yes they would have known if i'd removed the offending parts as I had to report back to the epa in lidcombe for them (it was the SAME GUY!!!!!!! : ) to once again go over the car, and run their tests to make sure it was all once again legal....

I think i've covered everything!! Hope it helps! let me know if you have any more questions...

Hmm, he broke quite a few "rules"...

1. They are not allowed to ake a photo of your car unless you agree to it, in writing. Did you?

2. The pictures are available to you via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

3. If you have anything different on the second defecting (say change the colour of the POD) it's not a repeat offence =no court. Defence is "your Worship, I though red POD's were illegal, but blue ones were legal."

4. The vehicle complied with DOTARS regulations (ie; it was like that when it was legally complied) and NSW is a signatory to them (like all states) they have no right to overule a Commonwealth Act. I would suggest fighting the first defecting every time on these grounds.

5. POD's aren't illegal, for example in a box they are totally unquestionable. This POD issue is currently being "tested" in the courts as there are vehicles that have exposed filters standard. In fact all filters are "exposed", otherwise the air couldn't get in.

6. Noisy exhausts get caught under the noise polution act, this is not the same issue as the POD. Almost impossible to win on that one. The best way is to refuse to rev the engine at the defect site, the correct words are "my mechanic has advised me that free reving an engine is not god for it. So I will not do it, if you wish to (Mr Inspector) then any engine damage is your responsibility". Watch how fast they back away. They can't defect something if they have no evidence.

Bad luck on the "same guy" :thumbdwn:

If i may whore your thread just a little Moanie

4. The vehicle complied with DOTARS regulations (ie; it was like that when it was legally complied) and NSW is a signatory to them (like all states) they have no right to overule a Commonwealth Act.  I would suggest fighting the first defecting every time on these grounds.

Damn your good Gary :D

Im sooo gonna come visit when im in Syd in a few months.

Anyhow, what about a car complied under the 15 year old rule?

Its still a Commonwealth Act correct?

As i've been defected for... wait for it... an Obscured Number Plate.

The number plate is in the factory mounting bracket, the car has been complied/engineered, RWC, and Rego'd but now the TMU (your version of RTA) has tried to 'F me over.

of course im taking it to court, just more ammo for me would help, for me and potentially others too as it seems Vic & NSW are suffering.

Hmm SK...

It wasn't taken to court specifically as a repeat offence. Moanie wasn't actually charged under that part of the act. If she had and been found guilty it would have been a bigger fine as that part is separate from the parts she was charged under.

Under the act it is up to the officer involved as to whether it goes to court or an on the spot fine is issued.

Any idea where it says they can't photograph your car unless given permission in writing? For permission; As far as the law is concerned, unless specically mentioned (as it is occasionally but not as often as you'd think) verbal communications hold just as much weight as written ones as long as the proof exists. For taking photo's; I haven't read the Privacy Act for a couple of years so maybe that's what you're referring to???

I notice that when Moanie went to court she wasn't charged with anything in relation to the pod filter, the only mention of that is on the EPA "Defective Vehicle" notice on which no legal basis is provided. It's just a box that is ticked.

"Refit ( ) Standard air cleaner assembly"

So what that means is that she wasn't charged or fined for the pod but was made to remove it to clear the defect. I don't know whether this is legal or not.

Ok, I've just spoken with the EPA and they use clause 20 of the Protection of the Environment Operations (Noise Control) Regulation 2000 to defect pods.

This means that the 90 dB limit is what applies here. So if your exhaust is under 90 dB there is nothing they can do about your pod. There are strict testing procedures for exhaust noise but nothing prescribed for pod noise so the law is ****ed here.

Clause 20 states :

20 Repairs and modifications

A person must not cause or permit a motor vehicle’s engine, or its air intake or exhaust system, to be modified or repaired in such a manner that the maximum noise level of the motor vehicle after the repair or modification (regardless of the noise level of the motor vehicle before the repair or modification) exceeds the maximum noise level specified in Schedule 1 for that kind of motor vehicle.

Maximum penalty: 100 penalty units in the case of a corporation, 50 penalty units in the case of an individual.

So if you're under 90 dB they got nothing.

more to come...

Ok more info:

The ESMP = Engine Speed at Maximum Power. Test is to be done at 3/4 of ESMP.

This is the revs they test your car at. They have certified certain cars and engines and if they are not on the list then for 6 cylinder engines the engine speed the test is to be done at is 3200 (Woot!)

These are the engine speeds:

R32 GTR 5100

R32 GTST not certified

R33 GTR 5100

R33 GTST 4800

R34 GTR 5100

R34 GTT not certified

I'm overlapping with my other thread here need to find it to linky. Anyone got some spare time to do it for me?

Ok more info:

The ESMP = Engine Speed at Maximum Power.  Test is to be done at 3/4 of ESMP.

This is the revs they test your car at.  They have certified certain cars and engines and if they are not on the list then for 6 cylinder engines the engine speed the test is to be done at is 3200 (Woot!)

These are the engine speeds:

R32 GTR 5100

R32 GTST not certified

R33 GTR 5100

R33 GTST 4800

R34 GTR 5100

R34 GTT not certified

I'm overlapping with my other thread here need to find it to linky.  Anyone got some spare time to do it for me?

yep, here's the thread that talks about the testing regs in detail http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...&highlight=ESMP

Abo,

All good points mate. From what I remember pod filters can also be defected as they are an underbonnet fire hazard. So say your exhaust was under the 90db, but you got defected for the pod as a fire hazard, I beleive in these cases you could enclose the pod in a (custom) box (as opposed to re-fitting the factory equipment) and have it passed.

Richard

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • sold listed as a Tomei LSD 1.5 Way For 1998+ Nissan Skyline ER34 25GT RB25DE w/Open R200 https://www.ebay.com/itm/174006114594?campid=5338967980&mkevt=1&mkcid=1&toolid=10050&customid=&mkrid=711-53200-19255-0&loc_physical_ms=108689&loc_interest_ms=&campid=5338967980&mkevt=1&mkcid=1&toolid=10050&customid=71883f2ccc571356e0a757bc7adfdde2&mkrid=710-53481-19255-0&loc_physical_ms=108689&loc_interest_ms= it went in like butter all gears, alignment, back lash etc, rotation and clearances correct, and if rolling all rotates smooth and free when coasting down road , clutch in or out over 10 mph smooth... its the binding, clunking and jerking from a stop that is most concerning, also seems like its going to tear the tires off in 10 miles of normal road driving. 
    • What 1.5 way? There's no such thing really as a 1.5 way, just different ways of explaining 2 ways with different ramp rates. HOWEVER. In any driving in a straight line your 1.5 or 2 or 1.7 way should have no clunking at all. With the clutch fully depressed the diff should be silent (unless it's welded but I'm assuming it's not). Something aint right here.
    • Clutch is a spec brand, new clutch system,( PP, flywheel, friction disc, etc. pull type) installed 100 miles ago, with no problems.
    • looking for some help and maybe some insight on others experience with a new LSD. R34 GT ran and drove beautifully, but always alot of grip loss due to the open R200 rear end, so I just installed a new 1.5 LSD way into the stock open R200 for a ER34. Simple. Everything seemed right. I test drove for the first time this weekend. as I started to back out the garage the first time slowly with tires straight it sounded and felt like I had a loose or half disconnected drive shaft...that was clucking around loose and shaking entire vehicle, and making it feel like the trans clutch was spontaneously slipping then grabbing very roughly while just letting out pedal slowly. I backed it out went to pull forward with the same noise, shake and slip grab feeling with hesitation, I turned the tires to back out more and then pulled ahead some same thing but worst because of added wheel resistance (which that I expected) puzzled … pulling it back in checking everything over and finding nothing wrong, I tried it the next day. same thing, couldn’t believe how it shook everything again making a terrible noise and making it feel like the trans clutch was slipping and grabbing, but I got it out of garage into the driveway, got it straight, drove forward and then reveres a few times in a straight line everything shaking , causing what felt like clutch slip and grab every time, sounded like right behind front driver tire and I could feel it in the floor board with my feet,... worst right when beginning to let clutch pedal out to engage slightly, shuttering and sounding terrible along the way…I managed to slowly get down the road, babying it the whole way, once I was rolling (out of 1st) seemed to be better and between shifts, then clutch felt closer to normal…not slip/ grab etc., but back down to any stop, straight road or turning, same thing. Made no difference if all tires were straight or if I was turning. All other gauge read out correct. with in 2 miles as planned I reached the empty parking lot and performed the break in procedure that came with lsd, essentially to drive in a figure 8 a bunch.  Did this, binding chattering, and shaking the car the whole way. I drove it back home seemed somewhat normal once I was in straight line and past 10 mph or so, and I know it will “bind” on corners and cause some tires squeal when turning especially from a stop, but when I begin to move it still causes what feels like the trans clutch to slip and jerk badly as well as shaking the entire car, and sounds terrible, that I didn’t expect. I used the fluid they supplied with LSD kit and did the breaking, planning to change fluid as they suggest after breaking, but wondering will it get smoother or less aggressive with use? maybe a 1.5 is just too aggressive for normal road driving?   I have a LSD that I put in my 71 cuda when I restored it, with amazing smooth , quite yet effective results. Different style LSD but that ones a joy to drive. maybe expecting too much from this R200?
    • Join SAU NSW for a flame-grilled feed & flame-spitting cruise! Sunday 17th August 2025 3:30PM Meeting Archies Flame Grille Sylvania Waters 4:45PM Cruise Departure 5:15PM Arrival at Cape Solander Kurnell Meet Location: Archies Flame Grille Final Destination: Cape Solander Kurnell *Disclaimer* There will be a lead and follow car so no one should get lost. If you would like to attend or bring others along please put your name down and a +1 as numbers will be needed prior! This is NOT a race and we will all be adhering to all road rules. If this is what you want please come to one of our many track days. This is an official SAU:NSW event and will be run under a CAMS permit. One of the things that really sets our club apart is our commitment to being true enthusiasts. When on normal roads we strive to maintain good relations with the authorities as well as the public in general. When attending one of Skylines Australia NSW events please try to: • Be aware of surrounding environment and act accordingly. • Drive courteously on the state’s roads as a true enthusiast should. • Understand how important it is to maintain the good name of SAU NSW and thus, treat others accordingly. • Any misbehavior will not be tolerated and you will be asked to leave.
×
×
  • Create New...