Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

First off,

All rhymes intended.
Secondly,

Hi, Long time stalker of the SAU forums. Not a very often poster.
Here is my situation,

Recently (3 months ago) i had purchased privately a beautiful 1998 R34 Gt-t

The more i look at the car the more i tend to notice, These arent negative things. Just id like to further my knowledge and get some insight to whats happening.

As it is now (as far as i know is fairly stock. The only real modifications ive come across are as follows.

-Greks oil filter relocation
-Splitfire coilpacks

-Hks Coilovers

-Power steering fluid relocation

-3.5" Exhaust

-R34 MFD
-Aftermarket Oil Cooler. (Im guessing aftermarket as i dont think nissan uses bright blue coloured piping around the cooler)
-1.5 way diff locker

Now onto the real questioning. Looking through my engine bay one day i noticed on the right hand side, a valve or solenoid looking setup with two hose ports. These two hose ports not being attatched to anything led me to consult the R34 manual. Subsequently ive found that its the turbo pressure solenoid valve. According to the r34 MFD installed in the car, at peak ive managed to crank 0.93kg/cm2, now after some googling and a random ass turbo pressure conversion chart the value comes out to 13.3psi.

I then choked on my milo and had a realised maybe thats something to do with this solenoid not being connected.

Ill have some photos uploaded. Any advice or knowledge you can share will be really helpful. And also 13 psi feels like its too much for a stock turbo. Dont really wanna blow anything

Thanks in advance

post-135498-0-84581000-1411806069_thumb.jpg

post-135498-0-58774500-1411806095_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/449091-in-need-of-some-expertise-please/
Share on other sites

looking at that...it looks like at some point an aftermarket boost controller has been fitted....see those small blue hoses....they aren't standard...have a look around for a boost controller solenoid with a hose connected to it...i'll look similar to the stock one...or it might just be a air bleed valve.

Edited by Badgaz

Yes that's the stock boost control solenoid.

No it's not too much for the stock turbo - although there is some risk that it might die at that boost level.

Yes, it is too much boost for the stock ECU and it must run like a dog if it hasn't had something done (Nistune, other ECU transplant) to make it happier.

Look for hoses running too/from the wastegate actuator and the turbo compressor housing/outlet/intercooler pipe to see what sort of boost controller has been installed in place of the stocker.

Edited by GTSBoy

Okay sweet, thanks guys.

and well when i had bought the car it would misfire coming onto boost or any load. Since that i changed the coilpacks and plugs and shes running like a dream.
I bought an OBI Port and got nissan datascan out and running on the laptop. It qued up to the computer so that leads me to assume its a stock ECU. Otherwise it wouldnt reference the laptop/program.

ill follow what yous said. see what i can find.

thanks heaps for the help, anything else you can come up with would be extremely appreciated. cheers

Negative, no front mount intercooler in this case. So yeah itd have to be the stock side mount. Excuse my lack of knowledge, but that stock side mount intercooler. Whereabouts is he hiding in the engine bay?.

The last 3 months have been the biggest learning curve for me haha.

Though on the other hand this weekend I didnt have time to look around for anything you guys suggested but as soon as I do ill be right back on here

Sidemount lives inside the passenger side guard - in front of wheel.

It is too small to run raised boost through too. No more than maybe 10 psi recommended. GTT ECUs don't really like much more than 12 psi anyway, so you really need to do something about getting the boost back under control.

You could have a Nistune chip in your ECU or some kind of mickey mouse boost cut defender or such like. Post up your location and try to meet some fellow skyline owners for a chat and to compare notes.

Yeah definitely need to sort this out. Thanks heaps guys.

Im around Revesby area. Ill be handy with a case of beers if someone with a bit more knowledge than i could assist in finding out what the goes is!
Nevertheless its heading over to tunehouse for a dyno run in about two weeks. Guess i could ask them to look over the car.

The car coming from japan means its a mystery, I wonder if the auction papers could show a bit more information. Good thing i cant read japanese hahaha (buggered if id know how to get this translated).

all in all i just want to know exactly whats in the car so eventually i can choose to f**k it off or build off it !

Just randomly came across this lol, I have a r32 gtst and the boost is at 11 psi as far as I know the ecu is stock. Does to much boost really cause your car to run crap because mine idles really bad.

Running higher boost won't make your car idle bad. Unless it has fouled the plugs from running rich or damaged the engine. 11 psi on a 32 ecu wouldn't do that.

Just randomly came across this lol, I have a r32 gtst and the boost is at 11 psi as far as I know the ecu is stock. Does to much boost really cause your car to run crap because mine idles really bad.

When you say bad what do you mean? Hunting? stalling? popping/farting? high idle? hard to say without more info but we might be able to help

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...