Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G'day all,

I have been playing with my R32 GTR for a little over 12 months now, and am still relatively confused as to how the 4WD system works in the car. I have been competing in a wet skidpan motorkhana championship throughout the year, and during those events have been confused by how the system reacts versus how it is supposed to react.

It's simply a very wet skidpan scenario, lots of revs, lots of handbrake and clutch work. I have noticed though that if I throw the car around a cone in a 180 degree turn, when I step off the clutch the rear wheels hook up quite strongly and no power at all goes to the fronts. The car sort of hovers with the rear wheels screaming for probably a second to a second and a half, and then the fronts kick in, and I launch off across the concrete towards the next cone.

In a drift situation where I am feeding the power on, and sliding sideways around the obstacles, mostly the fronts engage and I get a nice smooth all-wheel drift. Sometimes though, the fronts will only kick in mid corner, or will cut-out mid corner. I don't get a warning light, or any error codes throughout the competition, and all the fluids / reservoirs seem good. If I grab the handbrake too quickly before the clutch is all the way in, I get a 4WD warning light on the dash, so I know that at least the light is working.

Is there any hard and fast rule or information about how the system should be working in those circumstances? I get a lot of people coming up to me and asking if I have disabled the system, or if I have a controller and have put most of the power to the rears. Granted, none of the people who ask me own Skylines, or know much about them, so they could just be assuming it's meant to be constant all wheel drive?

On a dry road, the system works great and I've never noticed it cutting in and out during normal or even "spirited" driving on dry surface.

Anyone got any similar experiences? Or can at least fill me in if this is how it should be working, or if it sounds like there's an issue?

Cheers.

Cliffs

Under load on wet skid pan during Motorkhana competition, front wheels engage randomly, and disengage randomly, causing me to spin out which makes me sad. Help.

Do you remember what the torque gauge is doing?

It could give you an indicator.

If the gauge is working instantaneously but you're not feeling the fronts grip, then the fault would be mechanical but if the torque gauge isn't reacting, I'd guess electrical.

As an aside I check mine in a wet grassy paddock, haven't done wet bitumen. (haven't had a wet paddock for a while either)

Does slides, straight line clutch drops etc and it hooks up as I'd expect, instantly, gauge and front wheels all happy together.

I found this article interesting:

http://www.autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&A=107753

The G sensor is pivotal to how the system reacts. Also it might be worth re-calibrating the G-sensor. You can see how I did it in my thread here: http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356654-r32-gtr-g-sensor-fix/

Regards,

Jeff

I'd say that using a fairly crude AWD system in a scenario it wasn't set up for will likely cause unexpected results. The GTR was intended to be a tarmac race car. The ATESSA was pretty much there o make it power the front wheels on a straight line launch and to transfer drive to the front under certain lateral G conditions. If that Autospeed article linked above is the one where JE swapped or rotated his G sensors, you can get a good idea of how basic the program in the computer is.

Being the first incarnation of ATTESSA, the version in the R32 was quite crude, and relatively slow to react (compared with the versions in R33, R34). So it's quite likely that your manouvres on the skidpan are happening so quickly that ATTESSA can't keep up, and may lag behind or just give up in despair.

There's some pretty clever blokes working on the "G" sensor and their results are astounding.

Datsun_1600 would be one of those blokes and there are others on the GTROC forum.

Incredible that upgrading this sensor can have such a profound effect on a 25 year old chassis.

Sure the 32 was the first ATTESSA version but the 33 isn't too different, maintaining line pressure to the transfer case clutch packs in order to reduce their reaction time.

I do like the electronic upgrade.

Fixing a faulty G sensor and improving the performance of the ATTESA system as a whole are not quite the same thing.

There have been a number of aftermarket ATTESA controllers done by various people for various purposes. The early Jap ones were pretty much teh same sort of thing that JE came up with - effectively signal benders. But it's not really the G sensor that needs to be modded so much as making the ATTESA computer faster and more thoroughly programmed to be able to control the output side of the system more appropriately. Vis ATTESA Pro and so on.

IMO the biggest problem with R32 ATTESSA is its tune, not the response speed. The ATTESSA ECU takes fore/aft accelerometer and slip signals to push power to the front (which works fine, as we see in straight line response) but then uses the lateral accelerometer signal to reduce the amount of power that goes to the front (this function is way overdone). The signal benders reduce the lateral accelerometer signal, so the ATTESSA ECU doesnt cut power so much.

$60 ebay signal bender transformed my 32.

The more work you've done on your suspension setup to reduce understeer, the more power you'll be able to send to the front. Nissan included the lateral accelerometer/power cut function as a way to stop power induced understeer.

Do you remember what the torque gauge is doing?

It could give you an indicator.

If the gauge is working instantaneously but you're not feeling the fronts grip, then the fault would be mechanical but if the torque gauge isn't reacting, I'd guess electrical.

As an aside I check mine in a wet grassy paddock, haven't done wet bitumen. (haven't had a wet paddock for a while either)

Does slides, straight line clutch drops etc and it hooks up as I'd expect, instantly, gauge and front wheels all happy together.

The gauge is working when the wheels engage. If I complete a hook turn and step off the clutch, as the rear wheels spin up, the gauge does nothing, but then as the fronts kick in, the gauge then bounces up to the level it is seemingly providing. So I think the relationship between the wheels and the gauge is ok.

I found this article interesting:

http://www.autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&A=107753

The G sensor is pivotal to how the system reacts. Also it might be worth re-calibrating the G-sensor. You can see how I did it in my thread here: http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356654-r32-gtr-g-sensor-fix/

Regards,

Jeff

Cheers Jeff, I'll have a read through the article and your thread. A re-cal might be worth doing, even if it doesn't 100% fix the issue.

I'd say that using a fairly crude AWD system in a scenario it wasn't set up for will likely cause unexpected results. The GTR was intended to be a tarmac race car. The ATESSA was pretty much there o make it power the front wheels on a straight line launch and to transfer drive to the front under certain lateral G conditions. If that Autospeed article linked above is the one where JE swapped or rotated his G sensors, you can get a good idea of how basic the program in the computer is.

Of course - Never have I expected the system to work flawlessly while chucking it around a wet skidpan, and I am under no illusion that it was designed for that purpose. But Tarmac race-cars sometimes raced in the rain, so surely the system would have had *some* of it's design characteristics aimed towards putting the power down on a wet surface.

Being the first incarnation of ATTESSA, the version in the R32 was quite crude, and relatively slow to react (compared with the versions in R33, R34). So it's quite likely that your manouvres on the skidpan are happening so quickly that ATTESSA can't keep up, and may lag behind or just give up in despair.

Hmm... I think the lag is definitely there, but was hoping that it was for a reason other than that it just simply can't keep up.

There's some pretty clever blokes working on the "G" sensor and their results are astounding.

Datsun_1600 would be one of those blokes and there are others on the GTROC forum.

Incredible that upgrading this sensor can have such a profound effect on a 25 year old chassis.

Sure the 32 was the first ATTESSA version but the 33 isn't too different, maintaining line pressure to the transfer case clutch packs in order to reduce their reaction time.

I do like the electronic upgrade.

I'll have a look over on GTROC and see what I can dig up. Cheers.

IMO the biggest problem with R32 ATTESSA is its tune, not the response speed. The ATTESSA ECU takes fore/aft accelerometer and slip signals to push power to the front (which works fine, as we see in straight line response) but then uses the lateral accelerometer signal to reduce the amount of power that goes to the front (this function is way overdone). The signal benders reduce the lateral accelerometer signal, so the ATTESSA ECU doesnt cut power so much.

$60 ebay signal bender transformed my 32.

The more work you've done on your suspension setup to reduce understeer, the more power you'll be able to send to the front. Nissan included the lateral accelerometer/power cut function as a way to stop power induced understeer.

Thanks mate, the signal bender sounds like something I should look into. If I do a G sensor re-call, and test it, and then if still no luck, have a look at one of these jobbies, hopefully I can get a solution. Do you remember which one you used? Brand? Description? I'll scan eBay and see what I can dig up.

Thanks for the responses - It was a relief to log in here and not just see a bunch of replies of "Your system is f**ked" etc... There's still hope! Lol.

I will have a bit of a read of the G-sensor stuff and the benders and see what the go is.

Cheers.

Assuming ATTESSA is working fine - Get the transfer case modded by a place that knows what they're doing. Power transfer comes on sooner and harder. Difference is night and day. Best $ mod for handling i've ever done.

  • Like 1

It basically runs in 2wd most of the time I'm competing anyway, and that works well for certain maps/courses, but I'd love the AWD to work full-time just to see what difference it makes. It's a wet skid pan, so no major loading of the driveline, it would just be interesting to see how it changes things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers)
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
    • OK, Step 3, if you need to remove the valve body, either to replace it, the TCM, or to do a more complete drain.  First, you need to disconnect the TCM input wires, they are about half way up the transmission on the drivers side. One plug and the wires are out of the way, but there is also a spring clip that stops the socket from sliding back into the transmission. On my car the spring clip was easy to get, but the socket was really stuck in the o-ring of the transmission housing and took some.....persuasion. You can see both the plug to remove (first) and the spring clip (second) in this pic Incidentally, right next to the plug, you can see where the casting has allowance for a dispstick/filler which Nissan decided not to provide. there is a cap held on with a 6mm head bolt that you can remove to overfill it (AMS recommend a 1.5l overfill). Final step before the big mess, remove the speed sensor that is clipped to the valve body at the rear of the box.  Then removal of the Valve Body. For this the USDM Q50 workshop manual has a critical diagram: There are a billion bolts visible. Almost all of them do not need to be removed, just the 14 shown on the diagram. Even so, I both removed one extra, and didn't check which length bolt came from which location (more on that later....). Again it is worth undoing the 4 corners first, but leaving them a couple of turns in to hold the unit up....gravity is not your friend here and trans oil will be going everywhere. Once the corners are loose but still in remove all the other 10 bolts, then hold the valve body up with 1 hand while removing the final 4. Then, everything just comes free easily, or like in my case you start swearing because that plug is stuck in the casing. Done, the valve body and TCM are out
    • OK, so if you are either going for the bigger fluid change or are changing the valve body which includes the Transmission Control Module (TCM), first you should have both a new gasket 31397-1XJ0A and a torque wrench that can work down to 8Nm (very low, probably a 1/4 drive one). You can probably get by without either, but I really didn't want to pull it all apart together due to a leak. First, you now need that big oil pan. The transmission pan is 450 long x 350 wide, and it will probably leak on all sides, so get ready for a mess. There are 24x 6mm headed bolts holding the pan on. I undid the 2 rear corners, then screwed those bolts back in a couple of turns to let the pan go low at that end, then removed all the middle bolts on each side. Then, undo the front corner bolts slowly while holding the pan up, and 80% of the fluid will head out the rear. From there, remove the remaining bolts and the pan is off. You can see it is still dripping oil absolutely everywhere...it dripped all night.... I got another couple of litres when I removed the pan, and then another few when I removed the valve body - all up another 4l on top of the 3 already dropped in step 1.
×
×
  • Create New...