Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

of course, gotta move with the times. Does he really only have 1 sponsor?? http://www.fernandoalonso.com/en/patrocinadores/

Fittipaldi's JPS lotus 72(??) were the hottest looking F1 ever IMO... shape & livery. The latest attempt to revamp it was mehhh...

The 95T was better. Whatever happened to Ducarouge?

Anyway the current "Lotus" is just an attempt to cash in on a history that sadly died in 1994.

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

Hurry up

:mad:

That is BS!

Honda need to homologate their engine like the others had to first time around. They already have the advantage from having a full season of observing the technology of the other manifacturers and extended front end development of their engine.

Meh, the who engine fiasco is a joke anyway. I don't have a problem with the engines but its a joke how the whole thing is being administered. By putting them on a strict engine life cycle they are probably increasing the cost of the programs by a significant amount ...

Been asked and answered plenty of times but I never paid attention as it didn't apply to me... But what is everyone's pick for the best grandstand seating at the Australian GP?

Needs to have a screen in front of it which I'm assuming they all do...

Been asked and answered plenty of times but I never paid attention as it didn't apply to me... But what is everyone's pick for the best grandstand seating at the Australian GP?

Needs to have a screen in front of it which I'm assuming they all do...

Jones is the best bet IMO, on a sunny day the sun is behind you and you can see the cars coming down the front straight/pit exit and you get to see the right left combo with some overtaking at this corner.

World champion stand is good, I was there the last 2 years, Undercover and screen in front. Get to see pretty much 3 corners.

If you decide to go there, sit near the back. Its Melboure, and it will rain, you'll get wet in the front few rows. If not, sun is a killer there anyway. I think I sat 3rd from the back row last year, back row about dead centre of the grand stand would be the best, but probably sold out (stand B I think it was)

Been asked and answered plenty of times but I never paid attention as it didn't apply to me... But what is everyone's pick for the best grandstand seating at the Australian GP?

Needs to have a screen in front of it which I'm assuming they all do...

i enjoyed the brabham stand last year

on the inside of corner one

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • My theory would revolve around the ~4000rpm point being peak torque territory on an RB, where you're supposed to be looking at max efficiency of the head, etc, and....just not having it because the skinny ports are doing something to f**k it up. I'll admit, it's a loose theory.
    • It could be in the tune but in both cases it couldn't be completely solved or eliminated by some of the best tuners in victoria so I'm DOUBTFUL that it's in the tune or ECU but stranger things have happened of course. I've pondered that theory too but is there any theories that thinner and smaller ports overall would cause a turbo to spike? I would've thought it would just restrict it in general if it was small enough to make a difference. I wouldn't expect it to make a different at what is essentially sub 300kw at 4000rpm anyway. I think the next step is going to have to be the 6psi spring to rule out the idea that the gate is cracking open far too wide initially. At least that is the cheapest (free) thing to check initially.
    • I'm thinking it is skinny NA Neo port sizing and cams. Somehow.
    • -5’s did it. 8474 did it. Not hot side related. ECU related? 🤨🤪
    • Above you mentioned you only need to sand primer if there's an issue with it but with fillers it says the surface needs to be sanded to X grit beforehand. Does that sorta contradict that point as the primer hasn't been sanded yet? At the same time if I sand the primer, there's a good chance I'll expose the bare metal and I'm just chasing my tail at that point. Or I'll just use a sand sponge instead of sandpaper, it seems to be far finer in terms of abrasiveness as opposed to sandpaper. From what I understand, filler is like primer and needs scratches from the sandpaper to help it adhere to the panel. I realised the way I'm doing things is actually a bit counter productive as there's a chance after I put filler I will need to put epoxy primer again as opposed to putting the filler first and potentially no primer if I don't go to bare metal. Will keep this in my mind for the rest of my repairs.
×
×
  • Create New...