Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What do you guys think of installing a RB25DET Turbine (a refurbished one, obviously) on a R32 GTS-t with a RB20DET running a R34 GT-T side mount intercooler?

Will I just heatsoak it? (i.e. does this require an upgrade to front mount or can we still use the side mount at this level?)


Would like to hear if anyone has tried it as well, either with the GT-T SMIC or an aftermarket SMIC.

Not keen to wreck my front aero bumper and ditch the fog lights.


I currently have the stock turbine at 12psi with a AVC-R.

I imagine to get similar response out of a larger turbine I would need to up the power more, but I want to know if I can safely do so within the limits of the SMIC.


Thanks guys.

R34 SMIC will require modification to fit. Will probably perform OK with that turbo but you may as well go straight to a return flow FMIC which should fit without too many modifications. If you already have an R34 SMIC just stick with it for now and change it if necessary.

Even just a water spray on the cooler will help.

The R34 SMIC will be fine on a 25 turbo on a 20DET at reasonable boost levels. It will make as much or more power on ~10 psi as you currently make on 12 psi and will heat the air less (due to less boost). Wind the boost back up to 12 psi and it will be heating the air about the same as the current turbo, but making power as if you were currently running 14 or 15 psi. As long as you don't do long uphill runs all the time, you'll probably never notice anything wrong.

What about the HKS 2530? Could I get away with that?

Basically I want to install a *slightly* larger turbo to run more boost, but don't want something huge and laggy and want to keep it within the confines of side mounts. Street car, stealth, fog lights, etc.

I can get a HKS 2530 for around 2x the price of a completely rebuilt RB25 turbine.

Ideally I would get a ARC 105mm side mount, but I have not been able to find one in good shape.

I imagine with that I could run a HKS2530 with bigger injectors and a new afm and make quite a bit more power than the stock turbine.

As long as I keep the R34 SMIC I can't really go above the limits of the injectors/afm.

Edited by Matvei27

Will the RB25 turbine lag more in the low end or are there really no drawbacks?

Is there a particular version of it I should look for when purchasing?

Would you recommend cams+gears to improve response or would I start to make too much power for a SMIC to cope with (either R34 or ARC)

Edited by Matvei27

1st thing, please stop calling it a turbine. That word refers only to the exhaust wheel on the rotating assembly, not the whole device. Turbo is short for turbocharger, which is the correct term. Note that I'm not abusing you, just assuming that your 1st language is Finnish or something based on your name, and providing a small English lesson in order to reduce confusion.

2nd thing, yes you will get a bit higher boost threshold. Will take a few more revs to come on.

3rd thing. There are 2 main types of RB25 turbo. R33 is closest to RB20. Will likely be the best choice. R34 turbo has a bigger exhaust housing and therefore higher potential power, but it will be laggier, especially on a 20.

I speak Russian and Japanese. English is still my first language though because I am from the US.

I was calling it a turbine because in Japanese that is what turbo units are referred to as (the whole thing) so I keep looking at catalogs for HKS units and such and that is what they are listed for sale as.

Any difference between the S1 and S2 units or are all the R33 RB25 ones the same?

Your thoughts on cams/gears?

Will the Tomei turbo elbow I have (for RB20/25) affect responsiveness/spool times at all?

Edited by Matvei27

Haha. Whatever the Japs call something (in English) is the last thing that anyone else should!!

I think S1 S2 differences come down to alloy and plastic compressor wheels. The Neo turbo definitely has a plastic compressor wheel, and I think that change came into effect for the S2 R33s.

Cam gears are NOT a waste of time/money, but they are of fairly dubious value until you have gone full house almost everywhere else. And running a SMIC and a ceramic turbo (and hence staying below 1 bar of boost) do not really constitute going full house!! And on an RB20 you wouldn't be adjusting the cam gears to give you max top end power, you'd actually be adjusting them to try to maximise the low end, given that RB20s are torqueless little things that wouldn't pull the skin off a rice pudding without 20 psi of boost. Anyway, I wouldn't do cam gears as my first priority.

I can't see the Tomei elbow being of any value. What is the advertising line that Tomei manage to sell them with? Why do they exist?

It's 3 inches instead of whatever size the regular turbo outlet/elbow is. So if you have a 3 inch front pipe it would match that. Less restriction than the stock elbow, or so they say.

Is the alloy compressor version worth it over the plastic ones?

They say the RB25 unit is good for up to 14psi of boost, but are you saying I should just keep it at 10~12 to avoid heatsoak?

Am I going to need new injectors and a new AFM with this thing too? If I am aiming at keeping it at around 200kw for the SMIC, that is right on the limit of both of those as well.

Edited by Matvei27

With respect to the elbow......the outlet of the turbo itself is much less than 3". The elbow can either open out rapidly to 3" (like the Tomei one) or it can open out to a lesser size (like the stock one) and then you expand up to 3" pipe with a cone on the end of the intercooler pipe. The difference between those two options would be bugger all.

With respect to the boost level.....No Nissan ceramic turbo should be run over about 14-15 psi because they will explode. They are fragile pieces of shit. It's got nothing to do with the heat soak - that's a separate issue.

The heat soak issue is impossible to say anything more sensible about that what I said in my earlier reponse up the top.

Right. I don't want to run it over 14psi as that is the safe limit. (or so the tuning guide says) But up top you said to run it at 12, so I was wondering if I should stop at 12 or if I should go to 14.

So, do I want to get the one with the alloy or the plastic compressor wheels. Does it even matter since the thing is still ceramic?

And still need to know if I will need new injectors/AFM with this.

Hoping to just order all the necessary bits at once to put it on and try it out; I don't want to spend all the time putting on a new turbo to then find out I need to order other stuff.

Edited by Matvei27

If you do not want to replace injectors/AFM then you will NOT want to run over about 12 psi on a 25 turbo on a 20. At 12 psi you will be making more power than you would with a 20 turbo at 14 psi, and you will be running out of both injectors and AFM capacity.

If you are happy to upgrade everything else, INCLUDING the intercooler, then go harder and run more boost. But not with a ceramic turbo. See below.

14 psi is not really the "safe limit". Some will die at stock boost. Some will die at 12 psi, some at 14 psi and some will hold on to the grim death at 16 or 17 psi. Lottery, and you will never know what you have until it dies. Many RB25 turbos have died at only 12 psi. My stock RB20 turbo ran for most of a decade at 14 psi.

There's not really any difference between alloy and plastic wheels unless you explode the ceramic turbine. Often when the turbine dies it will cause a plastic wheel to shred itself too. If those pieces get into the engine they can cause damage. Alloy compressors tend to stay in one piece.

To be perfectly honest, at this point in the life cycle of these engines, I wouldn't be putting an old second hand 25 turbo on any engine. I'd be getting a blown RB20 or 25 turbo and getting it highflowed with metal turbine to remove the risk of it killing the engine, and also allow more boost and power.

So, buy a RB25 turbo, chuck it in, run 12psi boost, and stop thinking about upgrading injectors. Sound about right?

Or are you saying I should get my RB20 unit high flowed instead of a 25 and run the higher boost on that (ostensibly for less lag?)

The price to hi-flow isn't terrible so I'll definitely order whichever is the better choice and bolt it on.

edit: I was told that RB25 hi-flowed would be too laggy.

So looks like options are:

1. RB20 hi-flow @ ? psi

2. RB25 standard @ 12psi

Which do you recommend? I am assuming #1 is safer and less laggy, and #2 has a better top end.

Limit of the injectors/AFM/SMIC is around 200rwkw, and I think either of these will get there, it's just a question of which is "better"

Edited by Matvei27

A 20 highflow will probably be more laggy than a stock 25 turbo, but as the power potential will be much higher, you will live with it.

Limit of all the things you list (injectors, AFM and SMIC) is less than 200rwkW, depending on the size of your rwkW. US chassis dynos tend to read higher numbers than Aussie dynos, so it is hard to compare.

Typically, here in Oz we reckon you can get an RB20 up to about 180rwkW with everything going right for you. More like 170-175 typically. Higher numbers than these tend to come from optimistic dynos. RB25s tend to max out in the 210-220rwkW with everything going right.

Here's something to keep in mind. RB20 injectors are 270cc. RB25 injectors are 370cc. Can't push both sets to ~200rwkW.

Some of the information I've dug up with search is conflicting, like this from SydneyKid:

GCG Ball Bearing RB20 turbo high flow + Performance Metalcraft split dump + Nismo 3" exhaust - cat + Power FC + GTR injectors + 98 ron pump fuel + R34GTT SMIC + Jamex panel filter= 225 rwkw.

I believe he is using his in a race application, but that really seems like it is pushing it.

My car is just a street car, but it needs to be reliable.

Would I be correct in thinking that a RB25 hi-flow is too much power for my setup and that I should aim for either a stock RB25 or a hi-flow RB20?

Edited by Matvei27

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
×
×
  • Create New...