Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So lately i've been researching crankcase ventilation and as there is not much posted about M35's I thought i might start a discussion about it.

As long as i can remember, i have had a bit of a cloud of smoke when ever i dump it when the rpm is in the higher range. I have found that the cause of this is inadequate crankcase ventilation and evacuation.

The stock system is probably ok for a stock car but once the car is a bit modified and power is increased and especially if boost pressure is increased, then the stock system cant keep up. So here is how the stock system works:

ALL engines produce some amount of "blow-by" (which is basically a mixture of oil, oil vapour, unburnt fuel and hydrocarbons - or exhaust fumes) which is 'blown by' the piston rings and end up in the crankcase. As this continues happening as the engine runs, it builds pressure in the crankcase. This horrible mixture then makes its way up to the heads. Originally and even in some cases now people vent it to the atmosphere through a "breather" filter, however it is now not emissions legal and it stinks and it doesn't create a vacuum to suck the blow-by out of the head.

For it to be emisions legal it must be recirculated through the intake and re-burnt. It also actually lowers the octane of fuel, but depending on how much blow-by your engine creates depends how much octane is reduced. The stock setup does this via a PCV (positive crankcase ventilation) valve which is basically a oneway or check valve with a spring in it so that it opens differently to different amounts of vacuum. Under strong vacuum (eg, idle) it is slightly open, under medium vacuum (eg, throttle open but not boosting) it is completely open, and under pressure (eg, boosting) it is completely closed. It is located on the front of the right rocker cover and has a vacuum line running to the manifold. Even with a stock setup this should and is meant to be replaced every 100,000kms, as if it blocks, spring stretches, gets sticky or fails completely then the motor suffers and you can end up blowing seals, smokey exhaust, poor fuel economy and much more.

Before the blow-by evacuates through the PCV it passes through a series of baffles in the rocker covers in an attempt to separate air from oil. As the PCV is not open all the time and even at the most important times (eg, under hard acceleration) the motor must vent the pressure somewhere. On the VQ25DET there is a vacuum line running from the back of the left rocker cover to the intake before the turbo but after the air flow meter (MAF). This line also has a oneway/check valve in it to only let pressure out. The intake before the turbo is always under vacuum which assists in evacuating the heads building pressure. The only time fresh air is taken in is when the intake manifold is in light vacuum.

There are many ways to evacuate or relieve the pressure. Some are expensive and some are cheap. Most use an oil catch can which is made as an oil/air separator to catch the funky mixture so that it doesn't re-enter the engine and can be drained and discarded.

Another point to consider is that it is apparently better for the crankcase to be under vacuum, rather than pressure, as it supposedly helps seat the piston rings better providing a better seal and therefore less blow-by and better combustion.

So, below is a pic of how i have done mine. I have a small filter on the intake line for the head, so this does actually introduce unmetered fresh air into the intake, but only on idle (which i don't mind). I have drilled out the PCV, removed the check valve at the back of the motor and introduced new check valves (which you can see in the lines - they are silver). I have also installed baffles in the catch can so that it actually works as a catch can. So the check valves allow vacuum from the manifold but close when its in positive pressure when vacuum is then introduced from the pre-turbo intake. I'm not saying everyone should do it like this and i'm sure there are probably better ways, i just thought i would put out some more info. The end result is that it works! No smoke out the back at any time and the car runs a little better.

Just my 0.02c. What do you guys think? More input from more experienced m35ers?

post-29959-0-40500600-1420460405_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

Thankfully it's much easier on a vq35, as mine just adds a catch can between the PCV and the return to the manifold.

Often overlooked is whether the can actually contains anything! Lots of the cheap cans have no baffling nor contents inside. Meaning, it's basically useless. I have a fairly large can, and it's stuffed with about 5 expanded stainless steel pot scrubbers! This provides the scrubbing action to remove oil from the normal crankcase gasses. Works really well. The crap doesn't build up in the manifold or the back of the throttle plate anymore.

On all cars you can simply add a catch can (seperator) onto the line returning to the pre turbo inlet. And leave everything else alone.

The blowby doesn't go into the manifold through the pcv, as it's shut when under decent load, and under low load there should be very little blowby to worry about.

  • Like 1

Then you should have a look under the plenum of a high km vq35....

It's not nice. There is lots of oil in the gallery's that lead to the runners, and it covers everything in there.

Then you should have a look under the plenum of a high km vq35....

It's not nice. There is lots of oil in the gallery's that lead to the runners, and it covers everything in there.

That typically doesn't come through the pcv. A catch can on its own would sort it

Yeah i stuffed mine with stainless wool too Alex.

Nathan, it is an Auto one cheapo. The catch cans that work (ie with baffling) are rather expensive.

Thats right Ben, but a catch can on its own wouldn't create continual vacuum, which is what i was after. I had a catch can on its own but still experienced the WOT smoke.

I had a catch can in Ben's suggested location on my R33 and had no troubles what so ever. It worked well which is why i did the same on the M35 - didn't work well. I'm guessing the combination of high compression and high km's (wear) is what makes the VQ25DET want to ''breath'' more

Also, catch cans should fill up on any car. If it doesn't fill up, then it is not installed properly or doesn't have baffling to separate the vapour. If it fills up too quickely then you have other problems to worry about.

My catch can only ever has moisture and ethanol fumes, hardly any oil. I guess it has nothing to do with power or boost and more to do with bore wear.

It did always blow a little smoke each morning, just oil from the pcv leaking down inside the plenum and sitting on an intake valve overnight.

  • 8 months later...

Boost controller I suspect. The stock solenoid is best left plugged in electrically, then remove the bleed T and insert the controller.

As the wastegate actuator is only 7psi it may be hard to hold any decent boost in the top end without getting a stiffer spring for the actuator, to hold the wastegate puck shut better.

For what it's worth, I ran two catch cans on my VQ25det Stagea. One on each bank of course.

The intake side never required changing as there was never really anything in there.

The driver side (PCV if my memory serves me) however, caught quite a bit of oil.

  • 2 months later...

I wouldn't bother with catch cans, my engine never spewed oil, even at 8000 revs and 40psi at the track. Emptying it is just another thing to worry about when servicing, let the moisture and vapours burn I say.

I got about 200ml of oil out if my catch can last time I emptied it, it was a good 4 months that It had been since but still seems like a fair bit of oil for four months of running it. I have put a new pcv valve in about 1 month ago see how it goes with that till next empty

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...