Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So lately i've been researching crankcase ventilation and as there is not much posted about M35's I thought i might start a discussion about it.

As long as i can remember, i have had a bit of a cloud of smoke when ever i dump it when the rpm is in the higher range. I have found that the cause of this is inadequate crankcase ventilation and evacuation.

The stock system is probably ok for a stock car but once the car is a bit modified and power is increased and especially if boost pressure is increased, then the stock system cant keep up. So here is how the stock system works:

ALL engines produce some amount of "blow-by" (which is basically a mixture of oil, oil vapour, unburnt fuel and hydrocarbons - or exhaust fumes) which is 'blown by' the piston rings and end up in the crankcase. As this continues happening as the engine runs, it builds pressure in the crankcase. This horrible mixture then makes its way up to the heads. Originally and even in some cases now people vent it to the atmosphere through a "breather" filter, however it is now not emissions legal and it stinks and it doesn't create a vacuum to suck the blow-by out of the head.

For it to be emisions legal it must be recirculated through the intake and re-burnt. It also actually lowers the octane of fuel, but depending on how much blow-by your engine creates depends how much octane is reduced. The stock setup does this via a PCV (positive crankcase ventilation) valve which is basically a oneway or check valve with a spring in it so that it opens differently to different amounts of vacuum. Under strong vacuum (eg, idle) it is slightly open, under medium vacuum (eg, throttle open but not boosting) it is completely open, and under pressure (eg, boosting) it is completely closed. It is located on the front of the right rocker cover and has a vacuum line running to the manifold. Even with a stock setup this should and is meant to be replaced every 100,000kms, as if it blocks, spring stretches, gets sticky or fails completely then the motor suffers and you can end up blowing seals, smokey exhaust, poor fuel economy and much more.

Before the blow-by evacuates through the PCV it passes through a series of baffles in the rocker covers in an attempt to separate air from oil. As the PCV is not open all the time and even at the most important times (eg, under hard acceleration) the motor must vent the pressure somewhere. On the VQ25DET there is a vacuum line running from the back of the left rocker cover to the intake before the turbo but after the air flow meter (MAF). This line also has a oneway/check valve in it to only let pressure out. The intake before the turbo is always under vacuum which assists in evacuating the heads building pressure. The only time fresh air is taken in is when the intake manifold is in light vacuum.

There are many ways to evacuate or relieve the pressure. Some are expensive and some are cheap. Most use an oil catch can which is made as an oil/air separator to catch the funky mixture so that it doesn't re-enter the engine and can be drained and discarded.

Another point to consider is that it is apparently better for the crankcase to be under vacuum, rather than pressure, as it supposedly helps seat the piston rings better providing a better seal and therefore less blow-by and better combustion.

So, below is a pic of how i have done mine. I have a small filter on the intake line for the head, so this does actually introduce unmetered fresh air into the intake, but only on idle (which i don't mind). I have drilled out the PCV, removed the check valve at the back of the motor and introduced new check valves (which you can see in the lines - they are silver). I have also installed baffles in the catch can so that it actually works as a catch can. So the check valves allow vacuum from the manifold but close when its in positive pressure when vacuum is then introduced from the pre-turbo intake. I'm not saying everyone should do it like this and i'm sure there are probably better ways, i just thought i would put out some more info. The end result is that it works! No smoke out the back at any time and the car runs a little better.

Just my 0.02c. What do you guys think? More input from more experienced m35ers?

post-29959-0-40500600-1420460405_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

Thankfully it's much easier on a vq35, as mine just adds a catch can between the PCV and the return to the manifold.

Often overlooked is whether the can actually contains anything! Lots of the cheap cans have no baffling nor contents inside. Meaning, it's basically useless. I have a fairly large can, and it's stuffed with about 5 expanded stainless steel pot scrubbers! This provides the scrubbing action to remove oil from the normal crankcase gasses. Works really well. The crap doesn't build up in the manifold or the back of the throttle plate anymore.

On all cars you can simply add a catch can (seperator) onto the line returning to the pre turbo inlet. And leave everything else alone.

The blowby doesn't go into the manifold through the pcv, as it's shut when under decent load, and under low load there should be very little blowby to worry about.

  • Like 1

Then you should have a look under the plenum of a high km vq35....

It's not nice. There is lots of oil in the gallery's that lead to the runners, and it covers everything in there.

Then you should have a look under the plenum of a high km vq35....

It's not nice. There is lots of oil in the gallery's that lead to the runners, and it covers everything in there.

That typically doesn't come through the pcv. A catch can on its own would sort it

Yeah i stuffed mine with stainless wool too Alex.

Nathan, it is an Auto one cheapo. The catch cans that work (ie with baffling) are rather expensive.

Thats right Ben, but a catch can on its own wouldn't create continual vacuum, which is what i was after. I had a catch can on its own but still experienced the WOT smoke.

I had a catch can in Ben's suggested location on my R33 and had no troubles what so ever. It worked well which is why i did the same on the M35 - didn't work well. I'm guessing the combination of high compression and high km's (wear) is what makes the VQ25DET want to ''breath'' more

Also, catch cans should fill up on any car. If it doesn't fill up, then it is not installed properly or doesn't have baffling to separate the vapour. If it fills up too quickely then you have other problems to worry about.

My catch can only ever has moisture and ethanol fumes, hardly any oil. I guess it has nothing to do with power or boost and more to do with bore wear.

It did always blow a little smoke each morning, just oil from the pcv leaking down inside the plenum and sitting on an intake valve overnight.

  • 8 months later...

Boost controller I suspect. The stock solenoid is best left plugged in electrically, then remove the bleed T and insert the controller.

As the wastegate actuator is only 7psi it may be hard to hold any decent boost in the top end without getting a stiffer spring for the actuator, to hold the wastegate puck shut better.

For what it's worth, I ran two catch cans on my VQ25det Stagea. One on each bank of course.

The intake side never required changing as there was never really anything in there.

The driver side (PCV if my memory serves me) however, caught quite a bit of oil.

  • 2 months later...

I wouldn't bother with catch cans, my engine never spewed oil, even at 8000 revs and 40psi at the track. Emptying it is just another thing to worry about when servicing, let the moisture and vapours burn I say.

I got about 200ml of oil out if my catch can last time I emptied it, it was a good 4 months that It had been since but still seems like a fair bit of oil for four months of running it. I have put a new pcv valve in about 1 month ago see how it goes with that till next empty

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...