Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I recently finished rebuilding my rb26. I am looking for insight into how much I can advance my ignition map with my recent swap to eflex fuel.

Currently sitting at 17.5psi and 14* this made 305rwkw which to me seems like there is much more to be made.

If anybody has been road tuning I'd love to see what your maps look like. I'm just looking to fiddle myself now that I have the AFRs correct.

I am new to RBs but 14degrees@18psi seems mild to me. Would 22psi be more likely to see around the 14degree mark? Provided I have reasonable knock levels.

Setup inc

Built rb26 8.5:1

Hks 264s

Hks 2540s

33gtr Fmic

Full 3inch exhaust. (3.5inch ready to go on)

Hard pipes

+all supporting fuel sys for eflex. (Haltech plat pro reads 61% ethanol content.

Any ign maps for 98 or e85 would be great if you are happy to share.

Cheers

Blake.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452568-rb26-e-flex-ignition-vs-boost/
Share on other sites

I'm not looking to extract every last kw out of the car, just interested in seeing how my ign map compares to others with similar setups. Being told that 20degrees with 21 psi blew your ring lands and sent egts over the moon is kind of what I'm after. I was browsing the EVO e85 threads and a surprising amount of people are road tuning and sharing maps.

Obviously every engine is different but I and I'm sure others who enjoy fiddling would enjoy seeing others maps.

I understand that it isn't particularly as safe as with all the correct gear. I'm only asking to see others maps or thoughts on my timing vs boost. I'll get the ball rolling

My base map 17.5psi 14* at full load.

My xr6turbo 21psi@10degees timing.

I don't plan on blaming anyone for blowing it up haha ;)

At 8.5:1 and e85 you're unlikely to nuke anything without drastic changes

E85 brings your EGTs down a fair whack which means you can run relaxed timing without the fear of melting your turbos. So you can use boost to make power if you're not confident touching the ignition. That's what I do anyway. Keep an eye on afrs though as you increase boost

A small amount of timing and boost would be fine 9 times out of 10 in your situation

I'm starting to sound like Johnny

Yeah I am not so worried about blowing it up, I have done a bit of road tuning before, I was just curious as we know every engine is different. And the Ford 6s I have been tuning are most likely different in the amount of advance they like. Evos seem to like up to 10degrees less than the rbs according to the maps I have seen

I also set up my anti lag launch control (2step) the haltech seems pretty user friendly.

and it coughs when it's too rich...

and if it's too rich it will knock

and if it's too lean it will just misfire

and AFRs aren't that important with E85

and you can happily cruise leaner than stoich with no dramas

E85 is awesome, minus the crappy economy

I've got 14 degrees advance at 3900rpm at 1.6bar, it then slowly climbs to 16 degrees by 5100rpm and then finishes up at 19 degrees at 7500rpm

Probably could take more as my exhaust manifold started to glow on a long pull.

At 8.5:1 and e85 you're unlikely to nuke anything without drastic changes

E85 brings your EGTs down a fair whack which means you can run relaxed timing without the fear of melting your turbos. So you can use boost to make power if you're not confident touching the ignition. That's what I do anyway. Keep an eye on afrs though as you increase boost

A small amount of timing and boost would be fine 9 times out of 10 in your situation

I'm starting to sound like Johnny

hahahaha MORE BOOST :)

yes lazy, inefficient way of tuning but at least you won't grenade stuff... on 98RON it's not such a smart idea as your EGTs will go through the roof and you'll end up melting stuff on the hotside, include exhaust valves.

accurate mixture control combined with the best timing would be ideal in any situation. my rb25det runs 18degrees at 1.2bar on 98octane.

where do you want the most power to be? top end of the rpm or as early as possible?

I'm not too fussed Tbh, with the 2540s it's never going to do much under 4500rpm. My understanding is that with rpm after peak torque you increase timing gradually to make up for loss of cylinder pressure.

So with the old setup, HKS GTSS twins, it made 312awkw @21psi unknown timing. Bp98

Swapped for 2540s added e70 eflex, didn't touch ignition but added 30% fuel trim. Dumped at 17.5psi @14* 305rwkw

So what I might do is bump boost up to 21psi again, 14* and go from there. Seeing as I only have my 3inch cat back on there for now I'll cap it at 21psi and add a degree or two and see how it goes.

  • Like 1

My goal here is to enjoy fiddling with my car while learning /practicing my tuning. I'm not fussed on outright numbers, I'm just having fun, and being a test mule if anyone has any ideas.

  • Like 1

I'm not too fussed Tbh, with the 2540s it's never going to do much under 4500rpm. My understanding is that with rpm after peak torque you increase timing gradually to make up for loss of cylinder pressure.

its not for loss of cylinder pressure that you increase timing its because the time between firing events (spark) is less when rpm increases.

you want peak cylinder pressure at around 12 degrees atdc,any more or any less and you lose torque, you therefor need to ignite the mix so it burns at a rate that gives peak pressure at that angle, as revs go up, the piston moves faster so mix needs to be lit earlyer or peak pressure will occur after the desired angle, and waste power, yet you dont want to advance to much as the other side puts stupid amounts of strain on the motor and wastes energy to.
however as more load is placed on the motor, more heat is in the chamber so mix burns faster, so timing needs to decrease to keep peak pressure at the right angle, or else your firing to early and can cause damage from to much strain.

this is on a motor that isnt limited by knock,
most rb25 with big turbos and huge boost will be knock limited at some point, so wont actually be able to be at 12 degrees atdc with peak cylinder pressure as the burn is to unstable and starts pinging so in these cases peak pressure ends up being later atdc to keep things working without damage

how do you measure this?
knock ears and a dyno,
increase timing in a cell while holding steady state on the dyno and watch the torque fiqure, it will plateau and then drop, at the start of this plateau is where you want your timing to be, any more or any less and your wasting power and arnt helping the motor at all,

if when advancing the timing it starts to ping before it plateaus, thats how you know the engine is knock limited, and timing needs to be put back to stop the pinging


slight changes in engine setups, and even just slight tollerance differences between motors, is what could make one map work perfect for one persons motor, and make another persons motor need a tow truck, so be careful when playing with ignition timing without the correct tools

Edited by Scott Black

its not for loss of cylinder pressure that you increase timing its because the time between firing events (spark) is less when rpm increases.

Actually, it is both. You can't run as much advance around peak VE when the engine is knock limited, which is the short way of saying what Scott said above.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...