Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As far as I know, there is no traction, nor stability control on NM/PNM35s.

You have the awd system, which actively shifts torque front and rear, but there is no individual wheel interaction besides the abs system.

Pm35 models (rwd) have traction control only.

So... What did you cut?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453267-vdc-yaw-sensor/#findComment-7469893
Share on other sites

What I did was install a switch between the ground line to the yaw sensor/ g sensor. After doing this it feels as the car is rear wheel drive and when it brakes traction the Ecuador des not retard the engine and drop the revs to regain traction you can just keep lighting the tyres up. When the switch is on the 4wd and abs lights come on but abs is still working. Look up 350z VDC off and g35x turn off VDC. Same principleas ours http://my350z.com/forum/engine-drivetrain-and-forced-induction-diy/505135-diy-disabling-vdc.html our VDC looks like this in this pic.

post-114824-14225670008913_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453267-vdc-yaw-sensor/#findComment-7469908
Share on other sites

You mean it doesn't transfer power to the front, it stays RWD, as would be expected when you cut the G sensor.

Our engines don't retard or drop revs afaik. The V35 does, and it has the TCS light on the dash too.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453267-vdc-yaw-sensor/#findComment-7469914
Share on other sites

Yeah it seems to be. But it also didn't seem to drop the revs when traction is lost. As in when I plant it from a stand still up my hill it looses traction then revs drop till it is regained. After disabling the g sensor via a switch I can just keep the tyres spinning all the way up the hill.

Your right that it defiantly isn't the same as in the 350z and v35 but still some benefit from adding the switch:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453267-vdc-yaw-sensor/#findComment-7469929
Share on other sites

At a guess, it drops rev because the starts sending torque to the front, and starts to create more grip. Now you have just made a rwd. Dunno if it's safe for the awd system or not.

Just for any pnm35 owners looking, all you have to do to make yours rwd safely is remove the fuse in the drivers kick panel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453267-vdc-yaw-sensor/#findComment-7469973
Share on other sites

I looked into this with my Nissan mech mate, seems there are two Attessa computers at least, one of which probably has some traction/stability control. His is an ARX, mine a base model RS and they are different part numbers.

I know Craigs ARX never had traction, or stability control. :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453267-vdc-yaw-sensor/#findComment-7470198
Share on other sites

At a guess, it drops rev because the starts sending torque to the front, and starts to create more grip. Now you have just made a rwd. Dunno if it's safe for the awd system or not.

Just for any pnm35 owners looking, all you have to do to make yours rwd safely is remove the fuse in the drivers kick panel.

well been driving with it switched off in red mode for the past few days. Seems to be no issues with the Atessa system as it will re engage with no issues when switched off and restarted. So so far seems to be a simple way to alter between awd and RWD ;)
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453267-vdc-yaw-sensor/#findComment-7470990
Share on other sites

That's good.

But what I really meant was there maybe pressure causing damage to the transfer case. I know there is some difference between the systems in the r32 and the 33/34 which means you can flick a switch in the 32, but in later models you can install a switch, but it causes damage to the transfer.

I don't know enough about the clutch packs and pressure to tell you exactly the issue, but I know some cars are effected. Just want to make you aware of it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453267-vdc-yaw-sensor/#findComment-7471010
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...