Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My apologies.

To clarify: I don't want to move away from the active rear differential, however if people know of an aftermarket replacement for this, that retains the electronic control is be keen to investigate it.

:)

AFAIK there is no aftermarket upgrade to the A-LSD.

Let's be brutally clear here. The very best active diff in a car of similar technological vintage to your GTR is the one in the EVO. Like the EVO 9 for example. Serious users of that car will pay quite large sums of money to buy the mechanical diff out of the RS in order to get rid of the pox-ridden active diff. They usually have to do this because the AYC diff just shits itself, but right up uuntil that point they're usually complaining about how they hate what the diff is doing.

Edited by GTSBoy

Thanks for the input guys.

I won't have the funds to be able to change the rear at this stage but will give it a look in the future.

I've got some expensive panel work to take care of!

Thinking next year I'll refresh the bushes, suspension links and sway bars then see where to next.

Hmmmmm, so will the quaife be any improvement over factory if I'm not changing the rear?

It will, but it will make the A-LSD in the rear behave in VERY strange ways.

I did my front first and rear later. The rear would not lock up properly anymore. It must have something to do with the g-sensors or something that is governing the A-LSD system...

Either way, more grip at the front = the rear A-LSD very unhappy.

Wow, this is quite a disappointment.

Guess I'll keep the diff in storage indefinitely as I'm not wanting to move away from the active rear diff any time soon, otherwise what's the difference between a v-spec and standard after the suspension has been replaced.

Thanks for the input.

The badge, front and rear diffusers on The V - Spec, 2 extra fields on the MFD and the quicker 4WD computer.

Nissan should have done us all a huge favour and left the mechanical diffs in instead of being fancy.

In other news, doing the engine Mounts realigned the intercooler to intake manifold piping, fixing a boost leak I didn't know I had.

Found a second hand front pipe and got rips to make a pair of AFM Delete pipes.

FPR and retune later and I'm up 25kw with a similar gain in torque.

Stoked

  • 2 weeks later...

what about changing diff ratios 4.11, utilizing the gtr 33 v spec diffs?

would make the car feel more responsive but you'll be shifting alot more often but it would be more fun on track days.

I've also Binned my A-LSD aswell...

I just put a cusco one-way in the front of my R34 V-Spec (<$1k landed). A-LSD hasn't caused any issues as yet, but I've not pushed it hard or been on the track yet.

The A-LSD thing is annoying. If it was as easy as replacing the centre, I would have done it already given everyone's feedback on diffs.

I'm doing similar things to the OP:

Got Bilstein PSS9s, Ikeya upper arms F+R, DBA4000s, crap pads (going to change) and have ordered the Whiteline sway kit F+R+links.

Having said all that, you can't discount the impact of good tyres. I'm running on 400 treadwear P-Zero All Seasons which are not confidence inspiring at all. Would budget for good tyres.

Feedback on rigid collars is interesting.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...