Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys. So I rebuilt my rb25 last year after burning out exhaust valves and scoring a couple cylinders and ever since have had a large increase is turbo lag.

I am running a Hypergear ATR43G3 with a .82 exhaust housing.

Engine was rebuilt with:

CP 8.5:1 forged pistons 86.5mm

Spool forged rods

Acl bearings

Crank collar

All new valves with stiffer springs

Balanced and block decked + head skimmed

Cometic MLS Gasket

Added an adjustable exhaust cam gear but left it set at 0

Now I know that I have lowered compression but I find it hard to believe that such a small decrease in compression (after accounting for the decking and skimming of head) would result in my lag. I currently reach full boost of 21psi at 5000rpm, whereas before the build I made full boost of 18psi at 4000rpm.

I inspected the turbo and found no damage, checked wastegate was sealing correctly, checked for vacuum/boost leaks and pre turbo exhaust leaks. The car is tuned with a powerfc, z32 afm and 740cc nismo injectors on 98 making 301rwkw. The only other change I have noticed since the build is that manifold vacuum has dropped from 24inhg to 16-18inhg, leading me to thinking that possibly the exhaust cam is retarded thus causing increased valve overlap, unless the drop in compression would cause such a drop in vaccum (I expect some loss of vaccum). I lined up the cam timing marks and crank timing mark correctly and triple checked they were spot on, however I didn't degree the camshafts.

Does this sound like a possible cause of this increased lag? Or does anyone have any other theories as to what could be causing such a large increase in response. The turbo comes on hard but as a streeter it is far too slow to spool. I'll also add that I have checked that VCT is operating correctly.

Thanks in advance

Edited by Daza33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453767-increased-lag-after-rebuild/
Share on other sites

1. Skimming head and decking block will INCREASE compression, not decrease it. So no point looking for the problem there.

2. My bet is that regardless of you setting the adjustable cam at zero, the cam timing is in fact somewhat different to what it was before you took the engine apart.

3. You say you have checked that VCT is working correctly. If you trigger it at idle, what changes?

I understand that skimming the head and decking the block will increase compression, I was more getting at the fact that with the 8.5:1 pistons it would bring compression back closer to 9:1

After the rebuild the VCT solenoid crapped out and fried the VCT driver in the powerfc. I fitted a new solenoid and repaired the ecu and can verify it is working because I have disconnected the solenoid and the car drives like a pig.

I'd be immediately suspicious that it's not right, regardless of all the marks reportedly lining up.

From my point of view, I would never re-assemble an engine without slapping the degree wheel on it and checking the cam timing - especially if I've changed to adjustable gears or somesuch. The peace of mind that results from knowing absolutely what the LCAs etc are is worth the price of admission alone.

I'd like to know if using stiffer springs causes the lifter to collapse a little and decrease the amount of lift of the cam? I recently pulled some shagged lifters and I know the engine wasn't breathing too well, but maybe not relevant here.

I pulled my lifters apart and cleaned them out, however I believe the springs shouldn't cause any issues with lifters.

I was always under the impression that over revving the engine is what causes hydraulic lifters to shit themselves, because they can't keep up as opposed to solid lifters.

whatever is wrong is likely to be pretty obvious/basic given the lag descrepancy

id suggest looking at your base timing, check the cams and cam gear adjustments and also check and see if VCT is working

as youve gone through an engine build and turbocharger change a lot has been fiddled around with to keep it basic as to what to check

from memory stuff like this is caused by the cam gears being off by a whole tooth or an entire degree offset incorrectly

something like that might explain the mega lag

Couple of things,

Are you dead set sure you have the pistons you ordered? Wouldn't be the first time wrong pistons have been supplied.

Decking the block and skimming the head will have the effect of retarding cam timing, BOTH cams so time for the degree wheel.

Adjustable exhaust cam is easy but you'll have to consider the inlet cam too.

From memory the stock VVT unit has adjustment on the rear, bit of a mission to alter but is do-able.

Really depends on how the numbers come out when you check.

thanks for the offer Ben but it's a s2 r33 motor. After doing some searching on the net after starting this thread I'm pretty confident the cam timing could be my issue.

Everywhere I've read says retard both cams for top end, but have nothing down low which is pretty well what I have. Gunna suck adjusting it in the car but oh well live and learn

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...