Jump to content
SAU Community

Exhaust Query - Remove Resonator Or Rear Muffler For Sound & Less Restriction?


Recommended Posts

so i got rid of my old 3" > 3.5" JJR racing catback as it was obnoxiously loud and TBH it sounded pretty shit and tinny (yes partly cause i am getting old) and installed an apexi super megaphone jasma exhaust that looks to be 3" maybe even 3.5" diameter.

the rear muffler is huge with a smallish 3" tip and it has a large resonator.

Problem is it is too quiet, it sounds almost stock.

I want to give it a bit more sound especially when WOT not general cruising.

question is, do I

1. replace the resonator box with a small hot dog type resonator to give it more sound and i assume less restriction

or

2. replace the rear muffler with a jap cannon?

will be jap cannon if i do go that way. resonator is whatever the exhaust shop has/supplies.

i am not sure if this exhaust flows less than the JJR but i assume it does as the JJR was straight through, small hotdog and large rear cannon, but it hung low (lol) and scrapped alot and my car aint even low.

any suggestions? i've tried searching but haven't found much and my apologies in advance if it is there as i haven't been around SAU for awhile doing research and away from skylines for a very long time

ZDZjMWEzZTIyNzYzNzdkNjlkOTg1MDkwNmJkYjA0

My system is staright through 3in with a 3in straight through resonator in the middle and a Japanese muffler at the rear. I had to look a long time for a Jap muffler that didn't have a "waist" where it stepped down to 2 1/2in in the middle or just before the tip. It is just legal (has a cert) but at 2000 is not too noisy and does not drone on the motorway.

Nope cant do that xgtrx.

The jjr is straight and the Jap exhaust is jasma mandrel bent with no flange on axle back.

Thinking of gettin it cut and.flange.made up with custom dual 2.5" flutes but they may be too loud.

So not sure which affects sound and restriction the most in an system hence this thread asking.

Kiwirs4t, do you have any pics of the setup? Can't picture it ny your description.

My exhaust

2r45qja.jpg

The muffler probably has restrictions within it so I would probably say it is restrictive. I had similar issues years ago and when I cut the muffler open was surprised how restrictive it was. I went varex in the end so best of both worlds.

Just saw your pic. That centre muffler would keep it quiet even with a good quality cannon.

Edited by XGTRX

^^^what he said. My system is similar to yours but instead of the centre muffler I have a straight through resonator similar to the one pictured:

(and my end muffler is 3in straight through all the way).

post-49463-0-58934500-1425027251_thumb.jpg

post-49463-0-03698100-1425027323_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...