Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Where in the fuel system is the best place to place a fuel cooler. On the feed/pressure side, or the return side back to the cell. Low pressure. Im working it out right now and if I was to guess I would say the return. :huh:

Edited by MJTru
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/454679-fast-question-here-about-cooler/
Share on other sites

Thanks im running two 044. Was reading up a bit on if they would heat up the fuel a whole lot. What ive came up with is my regular needs to be changed. I need one that return the fuel right from the regulator and not the rail to the regulator. That would be away to keep fuel temps down. As well as putting a tee on the surge tank return and the fuel regulator return and sending those line through the cooler before it goes back to the cell. Damn im pull what little hair I have out my head counting fittings and all. Thanks again mate:wacko:

post-37293-14261134457752_thumb.jpg

post-37293-14261134592129_thumb.jpg

Edited by MJTru

Just keep it simple man..

Flow should be from your lift pump which feeds your surge tank. Those two 044s feed the rail .. Fuel is returned from your rail through the reg.. After the reg It will the run through your cooler returning to your surge tank

I don't understand what you mean with the T's, you want all your fuel to be cooled on the return

Draw a diagram to figure out your fittings,

Does that help?

Just keep it simple man..

Flow should be from your lift pump which feeds your surge tank. Those two 044s feed the rail .. Fuel is returned from your rail through the reg.. After the reg It will the run through your cooler returning to your surge tank

I don't understand what you mean with the T's, you want all your fuel to be cooled on the return

Draw a diagram to figure out your fittings,

Does that help?

Ok im doing the diagram now. Lol.

It's still hell. Fitting wise. But I dont agree with the fuel returniong off the rail. I should just feed that with pressurized fuel. If it returns off the rail to the regulator. Thats added engine heat being pass within the fuel that the engine is making. But they have FPR that has the pressure goes to it and from the regulator it goes (pressurized here to the rail) in the regulator the regulations of pressure happens and it then returns to the cell. I hope you understand that part. Now for the Tee part. Lol bear wit me here please.

So as the fuel is being returned to the cell it will go through the cooler at that point I want to take the over flowing fuel that the lift pump is pumping to the surge tank = over flowing fuel as well and tee that into the cooler with the fuel coming from the FPR. That way all overflowing fuel is cooled. Ha there. Can you see it now. :huh:

Edited by MJTru

Not sure you've got it right but maybe you're just saying it wrong. You need to do like GTR Joey says. The fuel in the rail is pressurized by being blocked from leaving by the regulator. To paraphrase:

Tank>lift pump>surge tank>044s>filter>rail>regulator>cooler>tank.

Saw a great OEM fuel cooler today on an old Merc, the return line went through a nice little coil wrapped around the aircon line. Would obviously only work when the aircon was on, but that would be most hot days I guess.

Oi Scotty, im surprised you didnt mention variable speed fuel pumps or pump controllers to reduce the need for a cooler....go on now, i always enjoy your posts on fuel setups :)

  • Like 1

Lol. I had already gotten these 044 pumps so I cant go the fuel lab stuff. Live and learn. Next time. Ok I did say it all wrong. Here goes again.

Ok there are some FPR out there that has the fuel pump pressure go straight to them. (Pressure to FPR) insted of the fuel rail. Now these types of FPR are away like most are from the engine and are commonly located on the fire wall. Internally speaking now there are up to 4 feed lines going to the rail and when referring to this setup there is no return from the rail. The only return in from the FPR. the only difference in the two setups are one always flowing fuel from the rail to the FPR. The other just pressures the rail and returns from the regulator.

I feel a regulator of that kind can reduce heat a whole lot. Due to the fact that the engines heat isn't being added to tye fuel on the way back. I think this time around I did the expansion a bit better.

I feel a regulator of that kind can reduce heat a whole lot. Due to the fact that the engines heat isn't being added to tye fuel on the way back. I think this time around I did the expansion a bit better.

Well, sort of. Most dead regs are actually located at the tank/pump end of the circuit, rather than up at the engine bay.

And in real terms, it's not the circulation of the fuel through the rail that really heats it up. It's the fuel getting thrashed to stupidly high pressure over and over again by really big pumps as it goes around and around that does most of the damage.

Lol. I had already gotten these 044 pumps so I cant go the fuel lab stuff. Live and learn. Next time. Ok I did say it all wrong. Here goes again.

Ok there are some FPR out there that has the fuel pump pressure go straight to them. (Pressure to FPR) insted of the fuel rail. Now these types of FPR are away like most are from the engine and are commonly located on the fire wall. Internally speaking now there are up to 4 feed lines going to the rail and when referring to this setup there is no return from the rail. The only return in from the FPR. the only difference in the two setups are one always flowing fuel from the rail to the FPR. The other just pressures the rail and returns from the regulator.

I feel a regulator of that kind can reduce heat a whole lot. Due to the fact that the engines heat isn't being added to tye fuel on the way back. I think this time around I did the expansion a bit better.

If you meant non return fuel systems, the reg is in the tank and the pressure bleeds off. Unfortunately you can't add boost pressure to these regs though and your fuel pressure would drop in relation to the manifold under boost. Not a good thing if like me you run more boost than base fuel pressure.

With a large enough pump you can easily run no reg at all, just using a 2mm or so restriction in the return line. I know this works because I initially tuned the Evo like that before I realised they had a restrictor in the return (intank), and the 460L was flowing twice what the stock pump could. Not something I would recommend though. :P

  • Like 1

Thats intesting. I never thought it would drop the fuel pressure. If that was the case. Here comes a lean situation. I might as well stick with the one I have and run the cooler.

What do you think of the idea of running the surge tank return and the rail return through the cooler.

Or would it be best to just run the rail return through the cooler only. :huh:

That's fine.

The hottest fuel will definitely be the fuel coming back from the rail. It has been through both the pump and the rail. You will get the best heat removal by trying to cool the hottest fuel. Therefore return from rail, regardless of where it goes (main or surge tanks) is the best idea.

I couldn't find a really good fuel cooler so I used a trans oil cooler with 8 an lines in and out. I will make a system under the car to funnel air through it on an angle.

post-37293-14262096618044_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...