Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

S13, but that shouldn't matter.

See video and not that in the long left hander at 0:41 and 1:43 how the nose of the car seems to want dart around a bit. All throughout the video you can see how skittish the car is. Last time I drove here it was much more progressive, I've added swaybars since then and I'm guessing the whole setup is too firm now.

And this is before the bars went in and starting from turn 1.

Here's what's in it/the alignment, let me know what you think. I did the alignment with a stringline, took 6hrs going up and down allowing the car to be settled again then re-measuring. I had no success with local shops.

So after A LOT of stuffing around it now has the following and "looks" a lot better.

Front - Camber/Toe (can't tell you what castor is, arms are stock). Considered maybe less camber might give me a better contact patch if the car is now not leaning over as much with the swaybars.
Driver: -2.75/1mm toe out
Pass: -2.75/1mm toe out

Rear- Camber/Toe
Driver: - 1.3/1mm toe in
Pass: -1.3/1mm toe in

Car has BC BR Coilovers with 8kg Front and 6kg rear springs - maybe these are too firm?

Whiteline 27mm front swaybar (adjustable and on max soft)

R32 GT-R rear swaybar (25mm hollow)
New end links both ends.

Federal RS-Rs 235 all round, was running about 29-30psi hot on that day. Maybe I'm just at the limit of what these tyres can do?

I'm yet to get under it and have a look at how the tyres wore, but the car was a late more skatey than usual, not sure if that's because the swaybars are allowing me to go faster or because something is wrong.

Yes I realise I am also a shit driver and smoother inputs will help :)

Did you use the same spring damper before and after ?

I would have thought before putting sways in the coilovers were taking alot of the load to stop body roll hence you having to run a harder setting on the coilovers?

Now you have decent sways the coilovers dont need to run double duty as such and take the anti roll job as much hence if using the damper rate as before your now too stiff....you should be able to soften the damper rate off to allow each part to do its job now

  • Like 1

I'm thinking a couple of things.

1) Like you and bcozican, I ponder if the overall suspension rate is too high. If your coilovers have very stiff springs and you have added stiff ARBs, then you will possibly have too much roll rate.

If you have wound the damping on the coilovers back to full soft (or even at the soft end) then it is very possible that you simply have too much spring (spring and ARB) rate for too little damping. As your very first order of business I would suggest that you look to winding the dampers up to half way, or perhaps stiffer and try again. The reason I say this is that if you are underdamped on stiff spring rates, then it will certainly skip around and be skittish. There isn't enough damping for the spring rate.

2) It is just possible that the ARBs that you have added have unbalanced your previous setup. Assuming it had good front-rear balance before, putting semi-random ARBs on top of that setup might have stiffened the front a lot more than it stiffened the rear. If that has happened, then it will want to understeer more. It certainly looked and sounded like it was understeering more in the long left hander. Admittedly, that will also happen if the damping isn't right, per my first thought above.

If your ARBs are adjustable, you could try softening the front one as much as you can. That will shift the grip balance forward a bit. Be aware though that if the real problem is unsufficient damping, then it could end up feeling better anyway, simply because you have backed off on the total roll rate at the front. Also be aware that if the problem is not in the balance, if it is instead simply too much spring rate for the damping, then softening the front without softening the back may well make the skippy behaviour worse at the rear.

^^ all that :yes:

also if all that is done and still a little unbalanced would it be a case of if you are now cornering harder and faster that front camber specifically (and may rear) might have to be increased a little bit also so that your not rolling over on the tyre? and increase turn in

Spoke to BC who suggested I speak with Paul at option1, he recommended returning to the stock front swaybar and testing that, leaving spring rates alone. Then swapping that around and putting the stock rear back in but leaving the front.

That's a fir bit of f**king around at a paid track day but it's not impossible.

I might take both bars, go and run a session with it as it is, and see how those times compare to previous Winton times then look to swap a bar out and test again.

Federal said my hot tyre pressures are fine.

Paul also said my alignment settings were on the money.

I put it on stands last night after packing up all my gear from the track day.

Interestingly the outside edge of the tyres front and rear looks darker/more worn.

Which I thought would imply it needs more camber.

Talking to a buddy of mine with a very similarly setup car (but better and wider tyres) he runs -3.5 front and -2.5 rear with the same bars and spring rates (although Tien RS and no BCs).

Two other things.

I'm being advised to get some adjustable castor arms and dial in more positive castor and was also asked to look at the angle of my LCAs, which are definitely not parallel upfront. Cross member side sits lower than wheel side which as I understand it is not good for Roll Centre,

Essentially, yes. It's about the arc that the arms swing through and the induced camber changes etc etc blah blah. If the arm is horizontal then the wheel is at the widest point of the circle/arc when at rest/zero position. Any disturbance up/down changes the relationship of the wheel to the road and the car less when set up this way than when the wheel is up above that diameter line. Know what I mean? Different suspension designs suffer to varying degrees. Skylines hate being too low. Silvias, with struts at the front, probably aren't as bad.

Then you start to get into more serious questions about where the roll centre is located. Perhaps you should google up the question and look at what happens when the roll centre is too low. There are some great books you can buy that will open your eyes a lot if you're interested enough. I recommend this one http://www.amazon.com/Race-Car-Vehicle-Dynamics-Experiments/dp/0768011272

If I raise it, I'm going to lose some neg camber also, so may also need camber bolts - but then strut clearance starts to become an issue.

A few people are jumping up and down about how I am still running stock caster arms also - which should give me more neg (dynamic) camber if I understand it correctly.

A few people are jumping up and down about how I am still running stock caster arms also - which should give me more neg (dynamic) camber if I understand it correctly.

Yes. Correct. And for a track car especially, the free dynamic camber you gain is worth a lot.

OK so raise the ride height, and get some castor arms.

I also have ties to the local BMW dealership who are happy to run over the car on their laser aligner for mates rates.

Any indication of what ride height should be in the rear? Front seems to be, get arms parallel, what about the rear?

OH I may also grab some camber bolts.

Edited by ActionDan

I wouldn't go more camber at the rear unless you want less drive traction. As to height, again the lower arms want to be close to parallel. If it was a Skyline you could look up the recommended eyebrow heights and use that as a guide. Silvias might be different measurement for the same actual height though.

If you lift the front, and the back then looks low......then lift the back too!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey Dave, welcome aboard! Good to see another soon-to-be Stagea owner here. The wagons are awesome — plenty of space, still got that Skyline DNA, and loads of potential if you’re into mods. Definitely post up pics when you get it, everyone here loves seeing new builds. What model/year are you looking at?
    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
×
×
  • Create New...