Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, colin.ssc said:

Yea 7 would be fine. I'd say 6s might do it as well. Just depends how soon you need it and how much you want to spend. 

Apply don't supply 6s to retailers anymore. Would have to be super lucky to get one.

1 hour ago, Manne said:

Apply don't supply 6s to retailers anymore. Would have to be super lucky to get one.

Or 5SE? Even smaller screen and have 6s parts. Not sure if its still on the market for sale @t_revz

4 minutes ago, colin.ssc said:

Or 5SE? Even smaller screen and have 6s parts. Not sure if its still on the market for sale @t_revz

Not really a thing, we get given maybe... 1 every 3 months. 

Apple don't really support their older products, also word on the street is that the SE is about to be completely ditched, not getting the next software update (To be confirmed).

If my phone actually had some memory I'd not bother with mine but it can be frustratingly slow after taking a few photos. Also can't update so lots of apps aren't supported.

Hopefully find the wife's when we get home then we have time and don't need to rush

If my phone actually had some memory I'd not bother with mine but it can be frustratingly slow after taking a few photos. Also can't update so lots of apps aren't supported.

Hopefully find the wife's when we get home then we have time and don't need to rush



I'm after a dishwasher too so might kill 2 birds with 1 stone. Missus lost hers 2 days before going to Japan so will be keen to do it ASAP

I'm not "hip" and up with technology when it comes to phones. Currently have iphone 4 and forced my wife to stick with hers too. Haha


If you like the size of the 4 and don't want a bigger phone you can go the iPhone se
Not really a thing, we get given maybe... 1 every 3 months. 
Apple don't really support their older products, also word on the street is that the SE is about to be completely ditched, not getting the next software update (To be confirmed).


Ditching the se at this point would be silly on their part considering how well it sells/sold globally. They support the phones for 3-4 years after initial release.
1 hour ago, TiTAN said:

 


Ditching the se at this point would be silly on their part considering how well it sells/sold globally. They support the phones for 3-4 years after initial release.

 

They've made it a prepaid phone now. Locked to Telstra.

Just now, t_revz said:

halfway home, in singapore.

 

so far smooth sailing. hope its not too cold back home

You might wanna check prices of phones over there. Might be decent. iPhones have global warranty anyway.

It's not that cold here at all. Nights are abit chilly =) but days are still on the higher end of 20s =(




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...