Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You'll find that the stock ECU starts to struggle long before the turbo itself is in danger (it will run to 14psi plus....probably....)

The stagea ECU is very conservative and will quickly run very rich and reduce the timing; you will notice this as more boost not making it go faster....and lots of black smoke.

So....if you want to run more than about 12psi you are going to have to do something electronic anyway (eg new computer or SAFC or fuel cut defender)

Here's 2 graphs from my car in the old days.....red line is stock (top line is power, dotted line is boost). black line is after installing a fuel cut defender.

stagea_dyno_boost.jpg

This graph shows why the power goes down like crazy; the stock computer was dumping in heaps of fuel (running rich) to protect the engine from what it assumed was an issue....see dotted red line which is the air/fuel ratio on the stock computer.

stagea_dyno_afr.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456628-stock-turbo-psi/#findComment-7534150
Share on other sites

Where did you hear that info? Your Mum.

Why do you doubtimg it? Your Mum talks some shit.

Are you new to the internet? No, unfortunately I'm not. I do however see as to how you may have been confused regarding my prowess. Given I joined a topical forum, located the relevant Stagea discussion pages and I tried to make a general inquiry about said stagea like a tots newb. lol ;) #twat

Your not the first to raise the boost on a stock turbo. & I wouldn't be the first in given ya Mum some pounds per square inch either. (Tip: that's like a quite a lot, more than 3 bars even).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456628-stock-turbo-psi/#findComment-7534207
Share on other sites

You'll find that the stock ECU starts to struggle long before the turbo itself is in danger (it will run to 14psi plus....probably....)

The stagea ECU is very conservative and will quickly run very rich and reduce the timing; you will notice this as more boost not making it go faster....and lots of black smoke.

So....if you want to run more than about 12psi you are going to have to do something electronic anyway (eg new computer or SAFC or fuel cut defender)

Here's 2 graphs from my car in the old days.....red line is stock (top line is power, dotted line is boost). black line is after installing a fuel cut defender.

stagea_dyno_boost.jpg

This graph shows why the power goes down like crazy; the stock computer was dumping in heaps of fuel (running rich) to protect the engine from what it assumed was an issue....see dotted red line which is the air/fuel ratio on the stock computer.

stagea_dyno_afr.jpg

Thanks mate for your helpful response, I noticed that the modest increase I gave it didn't necessarily equal the expected returns. Can see why this may be the case now.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456628-stock-turbo-psi/#findComment-7534210
Share on other sites

I like the way you say you aren't new to the net but failed a quote edit.

Anyway, as Duncan kindly provided, and you figured out, just raising the boost on a stock ecu really isn't goiin to provide fantastic results.. As has been mentioned numerous times before.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456628-stock-turbo-psi/#findComment-7534243
Share on other sites

The stagea ECU is very conservative and will quickly run very rich and reduce the timing; you will notice this as more boost not making it go faster....and lots of black smoke.

So....if you want to run more than about 12 psi you are going to have to do something electronic anyway (eg new computer or SAFC or fuel cut defender)

Had another look at your graphs and finding it a little odd that the fuel seems to drop so drastically (pre FCD) on basically the comparatively stock perimeters. While the Blue line is displaying a more even and greater power curve the two PSIs remain pretty equal. I would have assumed that at around normal performance the ECU/Injectors should be able to maintain load?

While I am not noticing any black smoke running at 10 psi, you mentioned that this may be because of the ecu retarding the timing & loading extra fuel, leading to injector failure. Wouldn't this extra fuel mean that it would be capable of simply providing the extra requirement? or is that the injectors are not able to maintain that load and essentially fail?

Is there any short term benefit to insure the exhaust flow is in turn increased, dump-Cat-mani-exhaust etc? Otherwise it appears that a ECU tune is really the best option.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456628-stock-turbo-psi/#findComment-7534678
Share on other sites

Yep that's exactly the point....the stock stagea ECU is very conservative and does not like extra boost. FCD was a cheap and dirty fix, something like an SAFC would be a better idea for a car that is going to stay reasonably standard. Whole ECU replacement is a couple of grand no matter how you go about it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456628-stock-turbo-psi/#findComment-7534731
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
×
×
  • Create New...