Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

GTX3076 TS with 1.06 a/r.

Anyone used this setup before? Gathering from what ive read....people who opt for the twin scroll option in regards to turbo/manifold, always go the next housing size up to whats commonly used on the single, in this case .82 would be fair to say is most commonly used on the neos. (Please correct me if im wrong, its the most common one ive seen people using on dyno sheets, but they dont specify the type of manifold ect..)

6boost twin scroll manifold. T3 or T4 flange? Does it matter?

To go a single 50mm external gate or twin XXmm external gate ?

Im chasing a comfortable 300-350rwk on 98. Getting the most out of the turbo without going e85.

I'm not sure how urgently you need this to be done. I'm currently working on a RB bolton turbo prototype that will get you a responsive 400rwkws on E85 fuel. Initial test results shown 380rwkws (out of fuel) and 353 on P98 (out of fuel) on the RB25 dyno sheet section.

That turbo has factory manifold and dump pipe patterns, uses all factory lines. Prototype should be completed towards the end of Aug.

Can we see a graph of this prototype please stao?

R34 GTT RB25DET NEO unopened engine.

- Adaptronic​ ECU

- 1000CC ID injectors

- Factory cams, cams gears, and all manifolds.

- HyperGear ATR45SAT Internal gated RB25 bolton Turbocharger

- JJR 3 inches turbo back exhaust

- Walbro 470L/H Fuel pump

- 4 inches induction pipe

- Split fire coil packs

- PWR 600x300x81mm intercooler

- E85, 380rwkws run out of fuel.

- Tuned by Trent Hewitson​, Chequered Tuning​.

power.jpg

e85v98powerboost.jpg

enginebay1.jpg

GTX3076 TS with 1.06 a/r.

Anyone used this setup before? Gathering from what ive read....people who opt for the twin scroll option in regards to turbo/manifold, always go the next housing size up to whats commonly used on the single, in this case .82 would be fair to say is most commonly used on the neos. (Please correct me if im wrong, its the most common one ive seen people using on dyno sheets, but they dont specify the type of manifold ect..)

6boost twin scroll manifold. T3 or T4 flange? Does it matter?

To go a single 50mm external gate or twin XXmm external gate ?

Im chasing a comfortable 300-350rwk on 98. Getting the most out of the turbo without going e85.

GTX no point without E85.

You won't be able to run the boost required to get the most out of it.

A GT3076 will match a GTX under about 20psi. The GTX's were supposed to deliver better response etc etc over the GT series but it didn't really happen. What did happen though is they are FAR more efficient at higher pressures, but you need E85 for that. Won't get away with it on PULP.

You can make a solid 300-320rwkw out of a GT3076 without going E85. That is what you would be aiming for IMO. If you want more, GT35 for around 350-370.

Twin scroll is "meant" to have dual gates in the ideal world, but given the results out there that suggest you can just get away with a merge/single larger gate - it's certainly more economical :)

  • Like 1

GTX no point without E85.

You won't be able to run the boost required to get the most out of it.

A GT3076 will match a GTX under about 20psi. The GTX's were supposed to deliver better response etc etc over the GT series but it didn't really happen. What did happen though is they are FAR more efficient at higher pressures, but you need E85 for that. Won't get away with it on PULP.

You can make a solid 300-320rwkw out of a GT3076 without going E85. That is what you would be aiming for IMO. If you want more, GT35 for around 350-370.

Twin scroll is "meant" to have dual gates in the ideal world, but given the results out there that suggest you can just get away with a merge/single larger gate - it's certainly more economical :)

Awesome. Cheers mate. How about the rear housing size? Is it a 'rule of thumb' to go the bigger size up from normal when going the twin scroll manifold/turbo option if after response?

For example..

If i was going single scroll t3 manifold/turbo..id obviously get the .82 a/r housing.

but as im going TS...

would i be better off with a 1.06a/r to give me similar response time to the .82a/r single scroll (as ive heard TS spool up quicker) and given that i could put more flow through a 1.06a/r, thus giving me more power and yeh a comfortable 320-330 on 98 is what im after at this stage .

I just havent seen anyone with that setup and would be interested to see how it went....and if the response was good and lag minimal.

T3 TS GT/GTX3076 turbo/manifold combination with 1.06a/r

As for gate. Ive decided to run the single turbosmart 50mm. I feel the 700 for another gate could go towards some type b poncams

Definitely the 1.06 TS if you are sticking to 98, on e85 you can get away with the more restrictive .82 TS.

There is definitely a .82 TS graph in the RB25 results thread, but it was e85 and fitted to a 6 boost manifold.

Where are you getting quotes for your gates? That's nearly twice what I sell them for, in smaller sizes.

Definitely the 1.06 TS if you are sticking to 98, on e85 you can get away with the more restrictive .82 TS.

There is definitely a .82 TS graph in the RB25 results thread, but it was e85 and fitted to a 6 boost manifold.

Where are you getting quotes for your gates? That's nearly twice what I sell them for, in smaller sizes.

Thanks mate! Although, id really like to see a graph of some sort if someones got one? Otherwise i might just bite the bullet and see how i go.. I just hope its not 'Too' laggy with a slow response time.

That price was from sonic performance. Quite expensive! But being turbosmart you get that i guess...

Being Sonic you get that, MTQ aren't the cheapest. Like I said, I sell Turbosmart much cheaper. ;)

Too laggy is a matter of opinion, but if you want less lag get a smaller GTX3071, GTX28 or Hypergear SS2 and push it harder, no point getting a large turbo and strangling the exhaust side.

Being Sonic you get that, MTQ aren't the cheapest. Like I said, I sell Turbosmart much cheaper. ;)

Too laggy is a matter of opinion, but if you want less lag get a smaller GTX3071, GTX28 or Hypergear SS2 and push it harder, no point getting a large turbo and strangling the exhaust side.

Thats handy to know ! Cheers

Yeh thats it, thats why im deciding between the 1.06a/r or .82a/r...plenty of breathing room

The .82 TS is about the same as the .63 open housing imo, and too small for that compressor size (on an rb25) without running e85, which helps suppress the detonation smaller restrictive housings generate.

Heres the quote from mtq/sonic performance

The 1.06 a/r is same price....pitty its got big wait might source from somewhere else..

post-136710-14380564356106_thumb.jpg

Edited by Kmac92

Contact SAU Traders mate, best advice I can give RE: pricing.

We have Street to Track who are almost unbeatable on turbo pricing from what I've seen in recent time, no doubt they will do a SAU'er a good package price as well.

Shoot them a PM - http://www.sau.com.au/forums/user/83240-street-to-track/

When i had TS0.82 on a 6boost, felt same as an open 0.82 on stock mani, but i lost 500rpms response for some reason, was same tune and everything else identical.. single gate on the housing but further around the snail so maybe that caused it? E85

Stock mani, gate off housing was best setup...

Edited by AngryRB

Contact SAU Traders mate, best advice I can give RE: pricing.

We have Street to Track who are almost unbeatable on turbo pricing from what I've seen in recent time, no doubt they will do a SAU'er a good package price as well.

Shoot them a PM - http://www.sau.com.au/forums/user/83240-street-to-track/

Cheers mate.

Haha when i click that link for some reason it takes me to a thread about a biodiesel skyline

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Harness is for a s1 Rb25det, and it is engine and lower harness.  the old harness had broken off plugs and was in very rough condition/exposed wires and splices etc. it is not able to be put back on the car, I could visually inspect to see if they had rewired any pins on the ecu plug. The fuel pump definitly isn’t turning off it’s an external pump and very loud you can hear it. Will look at the other harness tonight, am also going to pull the fuel rail and watch the injectors spray, will update here with what I find. Pretty sure at this point it has to be something to do with injectors because car will fire up on starting fluid and cas is clicking the Injectors. Fuel pressure is steady 43psi 
    • Check the injectors flow evenly, and are actually flowing what you and the ECU think they should be flowing. If it's starting up on starter fluid, you have a fuel issue. Is it possible under cranking your fuel pump is turning off?   The harness you replaced, is that the whole engine harness? Do yourself a test, and drop the old harness on and plug it into the Z32 ECU. It's possible they've wired things different. From memory S1 to S2 is different in RB25 and you may have a wrong loom
    • I haven’t pulled the injectors to watch them spray yet but they are clicking from the cas and all of the spark plugs are wet with fuel. I’ve thought the cylinders were being flooded from the beginning and was hoping fuel pressure would fix it. Tonight I am going to pull the rail and watch the injectors spray. Don’t know how to test/diagnose if the plugs are firing in correct sequence but that should be a timing thing and as far as timing goes my car still has the half moon for the cas can only install it 1 way. And my mechanical timing is 100% correct I posted photos above. Confirmed with the balancer on and off. 
    • I checked spark on all cylinders and they all visually have spark with the plug pulled and grounded, but plug 1 is the only one that fouled. This was a running swap that blew up and was rebuilt by a machine shop, put a new wiring specialties harness and did all gaskets, studs, and bolts while it was out.  compression is 135-150 across all cylinders. Aside from that from my understanding with the z32 ecu and maf the car should start regardless. The wiring for TPS and the dual 02 sensor/ dual knock sensor stuff shouldn’t actually stop the car from starting or even running well, (just slightly rich)  they just give fault codes. Car supposedly is supposed to start as long as you have z32 afm and ecu with the nistune base map and that’s info coming from a well known and trusted tuner who does a lot with SR/RB (Rsenthalpy). After more trouble shooting today where I’m at right now is that the cas is sending signal to the injectors they click while spinning the rotor, Fuel pressure is now set at 43psi, all cylinders have good compression and all of the plugs looked great (just wet with fuel) except for cylinder 1 which was very black (cylinder 1 has 150psi compression). all of the coils generate spark if pulled out and grounded out on the head. On the fuel pump car just pops into the exhaust. On starting fluid car will fire off. Hard to tell if all cylinders are firing off but definitley a couple. sounds like all of them but it’s only for 3-5 seconds hard to tell. 
×
×
  • Create New...