Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If my crank angle sensor was off center would it adjust my timing on the tables or just increase/decrease my timing depending on how much it's out?

It would just change you values depending how far out it is. Your ECU (and therefore timing map) assumes you have the mechanical timing set correctly.

We cannot tell you what a safe map looks like. We have absolutely no idea how your engine is breathing. We have no idea how much oil vapour is getting in with the mixture. We have no idea about the real quality of your fuel, etc etc etc.

The full load timing #s you have (~22°) would be safe on a stock motor. They'd also be pretty safe on a number of modified motors. As STATUS said above, many modified RB20s would shit themselves if fed that much timing at high load. On those you'd possibly be down to 17 - 18°.

BUT WE CANNOT TELL YOU. Every motor is different, even with the same mods.

Look at the factory map from Nistune. Your map will be the same basic shape. High where it's high, low where it's low. Its just that all the numbers will actually be different, and the only way to find out where they should be is to run it (preferably on the dyno) and advance it 'til it pings then back it off a couple of degrees. And then take into consideration the difference in load between a dyno and a road and the possibility that you are tuning on a hotter or colder day than average, etc etc, and adjust your timing to account for that too. And a few other similar factors on top.

As to your CAS......if it's not set to give you 15° then of course all your map numbers will be off by the same amount. The ECU looks at that table expecting that the CAS is set correctly. It can't tell when it's not.

I hear ya loud and clear, I have it worked out to run on a dyno a few hours from here. Timing has been pulled back in boost transition and boost.

I have noticed that all of the sudden the car is running rich when cold like 10.9 afr's on idle and is rich right accross the map. I have reduce the crank enrich + temp enrich figures down to the same as they are when warm with no change. I am not running the cold start FYI, Any ideas?

What do you mean "why so high"? The 40s in the low load mid rev region are because it will pull that timing there without any problem, and if you have less timing there you actually get backfires and crap going on too. The other aspect of it is emissions. A lot of what OEM tunes have are for emissions reasons rather than just the best performance.

The moderate load (30-50 TP) and mid rev area also carries a fair bit of timing, but it drops off immediately to the right of that as boost comes on.

You can see that the 5000rpm and 80 TP area is 24° or so. That's a sensible amount of timing in there (for a stocker). They can use a bit more, but Nissan were conservative. At the far right is Nissan's little R&R exercise where they really kill the timing to stop you from having too much fun. That's special. Not as bad as on an RB25 though.

A lot of the other areas are a bit meaningless. You cannot access the top left side of the map "on load"...it's more of an overrun area, hence the flat timing. You also cant access the bottom right corner of the map - its not possible to flow that much air at those revs - you need the turbo spinning and it won't.

So this would be even more aggressive than what my map was? I am glad you explained the left mid range side of the map, I was really off put by this initially. I was wondering why the base map was higher nearly everywhere compared to my map. And why it was exactly that the timing map I was using was so outlandish? And that most rb20's with this timing map would "eat themselves"?

I understand stock vs modified, 10psi vs 15psi.

But stock I would think would be much more prone to knock due to much higher intake temps and breathing restrictions?

Ultimately I am learning and not by any means not listening to what you have to offer, clearly you folks know more than myself. I will do a bit of remapping tonight and start from the base map -3 to -4 degrees and smooth the mid/right max load area. I did find another rb20 base timing map in nistune that was much smoother ande very different from this style that most share.

We didn't say that most 20s would eat themselves with that much timing. Just that there are certainly many boosted up 20s that would. And don't go thinking that 15psi is boosted up either. Think more like 20 psi for a stock motor being pushed fairly hard, or 25+ for a built motor.

very basic tuning, of course you need to also factor in EGT, knock, IAT, etc.

download something like Virtual Dyno...

start with timing figures as low as 10 and flat across the board, but make sure your AFR is nice and rich to keep things from going bang

Do a 3rd gear run, inspect power/torque made

Increase timing by x degrees

Do a 3rd gear run, inspect power/torque made

Increase timing by x degrees

when you add 1x extra degree and you're making crap all gains - it's time to back off the timing a little..

of course you need to repeat this process multiple times to get it right...

another thing to note, you can ramp up timing as torque decreases... this is where you need to properly overlay readouts to determine this.. then repeat the same process but only after peak torque to redline.

If you live in Australia (which you don't) I wouldn't recommend this on the streets at all.. but I'm assuming you're from the states.. so go nuts.

Do some googling and buy yourself some det cans or knock detectors or what ever they are called in your part of the world...and search here for Trent's article on detonation. - actually there is a link at the bottom of his post - under the name of Status

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...