Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

does anyone know what the best fuel pump upgrade for a 1993 r32 gtst would be, running GTR injecotrs. Placed a Walbro gss342 in it a few weeks back and I would fail under load, guys at autobarn said most people run them in their 32s. Just wondering which one is best that I don't have to rewire and run constant 14v to it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/460208-r32-gtst-fuel-pump-upgrade/
Share on other sites

Stock pump?

Seriously, it's a wire, a fuse and a relay, and there are multiple threads with pictures showing how to rewire a pump for 14v. It's not rocket science.

The only other pump that might work is the Nismo/Tomei pumps, but I wouldn't rely on the stock wiring for that kind of flow personally.

  • Like 1

Yeah stock pump feels like it's coming to its end. I've researched lots about that rewire but apparently you can have problems with fuel over heating and evaporating

Nonsense! Before I got my surge tank my in tank directly wired Walbro GSS 341 ran fine - never heard of anybody's fuel disappearing through evaporation!

The Walbro worked without rewiring but I put in a direct wire and relay because the pump will live longer that way and because I was getting a bigger turbo. There are a couple of tutorials in the DIY section.

The 341 would have been $400 over the counter. :P

Go to Jaycar, buy a relay, some wire and a fuse and run it to the battery. It need to be done, the Walbro's and most other aftermarket pumps require 12V minimum or the brushes will burn out. (The less the voltage, the more current is required to spin the pump.)

Your fuel temp will be fine with a 255L Walbro, it's when you go to a surge tank that it really becomes a problem.

I'm sorry but voltage and current go hand in hand. They are not 2 different entities.

V = I R

you failed at physics :)

why would resistance change?

you need to change the equation to:

P = VI, now say "if" the pump is run at 3bar base pressure + 1.5bar of boost (because yolo).. it would require ~11amp at 13.5V to run the Walbro 255.

This means, it will consume 148.5 watts

so put that back into the equation, now it becomes 148.5 = V x I, now as you reduce V, you need to increase I

Let's say we run the pump at 12V, that becoming 148.5 = 12 x I, current now has increased to 12.375AMP

A good real world example, high voltage power lines are in the 10s of thousands.. the reason behind this is to carry lower current, thus less resistance

I never said resistance will change. (Only partially true though because heat plays a big role on resistance)

Ohms law states that voltage and current are proportional.

I see what you are saying.

With your power line theory we can go 10kv over the line which lets say is 100 ohm now let's check current flow.

V = IR

10k = I x 100

I = 100 amp

Let's now reduce the voltage at the same resistance.

5kv = I x 100

I = 50 amp

Current is voltage flow. It will flow directly proportional to that of voltage if resistance does not change.

In order to calculate power with no other factors changing which you have done, you have to go back to the first step and see if any factors have changed ie resistance would most probably have to change in that factor.

I get a sense that some of this might be misinterpreted as "having a go" but if in person this would turn into a great discussion.

Correct in most cases, unless the resistance changes.

Running a pump at 8v will burn the brushes out, the motor is designed to run at 12+v, not 8v with load. I have removed many for that reason.

Yeah stock pump feels like it's coming to its end. I've researched lots about that rewire but apparently you can have problems with fuel over heating and evaporating

I use the Walbro GSS 341 wired directly to the battery. I can also confirm there are no fuel heating issues.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...