Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I was driving in my 3 today in the pouring rain. I came to a corner that I have gone around no less than eleventy billion times but this time my little 3 just refused to have traction.

On approach to the right hander which is a comfortable 50kph corner and you can easily get round at 65 odd without pushing, I just lost the back end. I was doing 60 and have reviewed my dash cam footage (which looks pissy in comparison to how I had remembered it)... The front lost everything, I'm not sure if it locked up but I don't remember it pulsing or any ABS interference. The back continued to come around until the front drivers wheel went over the medium (with a big crunch) which is when I regained control and drove back over the medium and the remaining 200m to my house.

There appears to have been no interference from TCS or ABS at all. The rear just came around (oversteer) and the fronts were (likely) just spinning.

My questions are; am I expecting too much from TCS/ABS? If the (front or rear) tyres have shit wet control or if the road has had a spill of some sort, will that just stop any computers from taking control?

I am just concerned that nothing happened. The car just control (or I lost control of the car) and nothing came to my aid. If I was in the Bora, 80 separate computers will have analysed and assisted in everything from traction to window winder controls. Is there an issues with the computers in the 3? Should I be concerned?

Long winded I know, but it just freaked me out a bit.

Thanks guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461806-traction-control-abs-question/
Share on other sites

It's all good.

ABS, controls braking force only, and only activates over 16km/h.

It sees a wheel that is locked and releases the pressure to that braking circuit to let the wheel roll.

TCS, is like the yin to ABSs yang.

It sees the drive wheels turning faster than the dead wheels, and restricts engine output to slow them down.

What you're thinking about is ESC (electronic stability control)(or similar).

This take into consideration all wheel speed, steering wheel angle, g sensor readings, etc.

It then applies different braking forces to individual wheels to try and put the car where you're trying to go.

All these driving aids are either better or worse depending on tyres.

Good tyres, will help the systems.

Worse tyres, will hinder.

And there are limits to what they can do.

Push too far, and they won't be able to help.

Hope this reply hasn't bored you too much.

But, the more people know about card, the easier my job is.

  • Like 2

No, not boring at all. Its the stuff that I've pretended to know about forever.

So, as my car is supposed to have ESC and the video below shows a similar model being tested, this tells me that its potentially tyres?

If the back came around, do we blame the rear? They are older and Falkens (lots of tread) while the front are newer Hankooks.

Could be tyres, surface (different asphalt mixes), oil residue, etc.

The wet conditions certainly wouldn't be helping.

Ok, you seem very calm. Am I worrying too much about this?

Ie, just slow down in future? :)

Yep.

Drive to the conditions :thumbsup:

I've done similar in the dry in the emo.

Knew I could take the roundabout neat my house at x speed.

But, there was dirt all over the road from trucks.

Front slid a little.

Now, I slow down that little but more.

Glad to have helped :)

  • Like 1

That road should be on a closed circuit of course

Of course.

Good idea though. I did that in my Bora a few times because I was wary of the abs. If it's still raining tomorrow I'll take it somewhere local and not public.

Thanks

Remember that ABS and traction control only work on the force that's in the direction of rotation of the tyre. The sideways forces produced by cornering are at 90 degrees to the direction of rotation. So, say you enter a corner with no brakes and no accelerator, then ABS and traction control are useless, and yet its easy to imagine how you could get a sideways slip going on a wet road even though you're not braking or accelerating.

Remember that ABS and traction control only work on the force that's in the direction of rotation of the tyre. The sideways forces produced by cornering are at 90 degrees to the direction of rotation. So, say you enter a corner with no brakes and no accelerator, then ABS and traction control are useless, and yet its easy to imagine how you could get a sideways slip going on a wet road even though you're not braking or accelerating.

Yeah that makes sense. Thanks. It's been so long since I've lost it in the wet I totally flipped out (had kids in the car too.)

I'll post vid once I've gotten it off my dash cam.

Which Falkens? Zeix? If so, there's your problem.

Cars not here, my wife has it atm. But I'm 90% sure they're Ziex.

I have 4 brand new Conti's on my Bora (currently lifeless in my driveway) but they're slightly too big (225 > 215) which sucks as I'd love to swap them over.

hmmm. best to rely on driver training/skill than technology.

Without trying to compromise the lives of yourself and your family, I would try to get used to the laws of FWD. Point the front wheels in the direction you want to go, and power out. It is scary losing the rear in a FWD though.

otherwise, i think this person had the right idea:

p2.jpg

More aero, yes :P

But yeah, I'd swap those Zeix out. Never had good experience with them. My brother for some reason put 4 new ones all round on his N15 SSS. Said they're crap haha.

My BNR32 came with them, was a death trap (very used KU31s were much better).

Cars not here, my wife has it atm. But I'm 90% sure they're Ziex.

I have 4 brand new Conti's on my Bora (currently lifeless in my driveway) but they're slightly too big (225 > 215) which sucks as I'd love to swap them over.

Urggh Ziex are legendary for being crap. Change them out straight away, esp on the family car.

If the 225s are an acceptable profile, they may well be fine. Plug the details into the one of those online tyre calcs and see. IIRC +/- 4% in rolling diameter is legal (but check that I remember that correctly).

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Keeping in mind that I am currently getting flat 10 L/100km on my RB25DET, which means >>500km/tank. I would test this car for vacuum leaks, check codes and AFM signal with NissDataScan as D says, check plugs, do a compression check while they are out.
    • It is hard to be specific half way across the world...but it *seems* like it might have a minor issue. Is the idle stable and does it rev smoothly? I would not expect any pops out of what I am assuming is a standard ECU, standard tune, standard exhaust. You can use Nissan Data Scan to find out exactly what is happening when it runs, the cable/software is reasonably affordable if you are not planning on changing the ECU (which hopefully you are not with an NA skyline) BTW your mileage may not be that far off, these are heavy old tech cars, and being NA might mean you use a heavy foot to keep up with traffic....
    • Hey guys! Y'all are the masters so figured I'd check in on a few items here. - My engine sounds ever-so-slightly more raspy than the other NA RB25s I've listened to. It's barely noticeable but definitely a slightly different sound. - When I back off the throttle at high RPM, I will sometimes get a pop out of the exhaust, assuming this can be diagnosed as misfire. Some history on the car: - Had an exhaust leak in auction sheet but was claimed to be fixed by seller (bought from USA importer).  - Car's coil packs and sparks were replaced when it was sold to me, but unsure on what the gap is and whether the coil packs are correct.  - A prior mechanic had misdiagnosed a pilot or throwout bearing sound as LSPI/detonation. Had played with timing a bit, pops/raspy sound of engine just got worse. Got timing reset. - Had failed emissions a few times. First time went in as is, failed. Second time, replaced cat, still failed, running rich as hell. Third time replaced o2 sensor, passed. Car still smells gassy though. - Timing belt and valve cover gasket also replaced.  - Gas mileage is... low. about 350-400K per tank.  Any idea if I'm having any serious issues here or does this all sound like normal old NA RB stuff and I'm fine to drive it with the pops/slightly raspy engine? If it'll help, I can get drop a video of the sound of the engine.
    • So....to find any R chassis part number, get your VIN (will be something like ER33-xxxxxx for you) and go to: https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/nissan and enter it. From there you have access to a web version of Nissan's part system, FAST. It is a bit tricky to get used to, so maybe have a shot and post up what you think.  You can also search by general model but note in some cases your car might have different options so VIN is safest.  On diagram 211 I got 14075-75T16 for Connector, Water Hose If I search for part 14053‑21U10 that you posted, that is also a water hose but not the one bolted to the plenum and 14075‑04U00 is the fitting where the water hose goes into the block.
    • Yeah now we are talking I much prefer coolers in the front middle because it lessens the chance of a small bump to a corner stopping the whole event. I was thinking the AT cooler can move out of the radiator, delete the AT/engine coolant interwarmer and mount a separate cooler with a thermoswitch somewhere further back as is common in racing, that would be one thing. Beyond that, the engine oil cooler is an obvious one to move to the wheel arch, potentially one on each side, but unused space is an issue. I did have a earlier pic with the bumper off but it doesn't show how busy the corners are: DS is full of the auto driving sensors and PS is totally fully of windscreen washer fluid reservoir But ultimately I was hoping to keep the AC, and the water/air heat exchanger is fundamental so it is not just the radiator that needs to be in front BTW here's airflow to the rad as it ran at the track (one horn is gone now and I'll remove the lights next time):
×
×
  • Create New...