Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not sure on a 34 but when I first did the conversion I got 33 GTST injectors (think they are 370cc too), Walbro pump and a GTST ecu, ran 12-14psi off a bleed valve and it was fine.

I don't see it as a great investment to put all the work in and miss a few pieces of equipment which limits your boost. I had the same thoughts as you about keeping the car. I like the car, it's clean and well looked after, mine is a GTS4 so I liked the AWD aspect etc so I decided to put the money into it.

Provided your car has been looked after and the engine isn't tired you will be able to run more boost then what you are after with the right mods.

mine is a GTS4 so I liked the AWD aspect etc so I decided to put the money into it.

Here's a killer difference though. You're unlikely to destroy the GTS4's gearbox with a 25DE+T at that boost level - it's tough enough. The skinny box in the RWD NA cars though is going to be twisted out of shape and not last very long.

What others have said about brakes and all that is still true too.

Okay after a lot of thought and reading through all the replys im thinking of giving the car a tidy up and try and sell it, then buy an r33 gtst with the money hopefully.

Thank you to everyone who opened my eyes on this, glad i didnt just go ahead otherwise i would have most definitely destroyed my engine.

  • Like 3

Financially smart. Could have been done mechanically though! I'm running 16psi through an NA RB motor, without issue. But the compression ratio is slightly lower.

Howd you manage that? And why didnt you sell the na and just put a det in instead?

Howd you manage that? And why didnt you sell the na and just put a det in instead?

Well, it's not impossible. The only limitation is boost vs fuel octane (until you start reaching the mechanical strength limits of things, like rods or valve springs - and even then you can replace stuff until you reach the limits of blocks!).

Howd you manage that? And why didnt you sell the na and just put a det in instead?

Because they are all but exactly the same short motor apart from piston dome volume and some very minor cam timing differences and oil squirters

My setup is on a different NA RB motor, but still a similar premise. NA+T will work fine, ideally you want it tuned and especially in my case where it's running 16psi. But 5psi through a NEO with an FPR to increase the fuel pressure should be fine, the nature of the factory ECU will compensate the extra air with extra fuel, obviously to a point though. He should definitely run it on a dyno after installing everything to make sure all is well.

I had a N/A once, then put a DET in and that was only the beginning.

There's just way more little things between the NA and the DET that may or may not rear their ugly head or annoy you, things you thought were the same... just aren't. A bit of bracing here, slightly stronger doohickeys in the chassis, just... things

The best and only mod for a GT is a GTT. It is the best bang for buck, and it is ultimately what anyone with a GT wants.

  • Like 1

Here's a killer difference though. You're unlikely to destroy the GTS4's gearbox with a 25DE+T at that boost level - it's tough enough. The skinny box in the RWD NA cars though is going to be twisted out of shape and not last very long.

What others have said about brakes and all that is still true too.

Is true about the gearbox... and yes changing brakes and stud pattern over was costly and annoying so no arguments there :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...