Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone. There is something that has been bugging the shit out of me.

I've been looking at the return hole in a few fuel pressure regulators and they are f**king tiny.

This is my issue - I had one reg, I would set the base at 300kpa. Then this happened.

3 Pump speeds, car was idling. I have a walbro 460lph pump. (low = 10v, medium = 14v, high = 16.2v)

Pressures at idle:
Low = 300kpa
Medium = 340kpa

High = 380kpa

Return line was in a bucket to rule out everything else.

So I bought a newer better quality reg - Turbo Smart 1200hp (I run E85). The hole is still tiny! it is about 3/16.

If there is a shit load of flow needing to get back to the tank, this little hole isn't going to do it. I don't understand the design. I called turbosmart and the guy I spoke to knew his stuff. But he said that they've tried bigger holes and had issues so they went to a smaller hole again.

When I log my fuel pressure, you can see the pressure jumping when the pump changes speeds.



Is someone able to shed some light on this for me? How does this tiny return port work and why it needs to be so small / or if its meant to be bigger?

Thanks

Not sure i understand the issue. The bigger the hole the harder the pump would have to work to maintain pressure so any bigger than needed would not be good. If the pump volume changes at set intervals, eg set rpm or throttle position, the tune would accommodate this?

Do an orifice flow calculation for a 3/16" hole with 4 bar of pressure drop across it.

You will need the density of the fuel and an estimate of the Cd of the orifice. I'd start with 0.8 as a guess.

See how much fuel you can squeeze through the hole.

A fuel pressure regulator does not work the way you played with it.

Turn up the pump voltage and expect the pressure to rise, then readjust your regulator to bring it down to where you need it.

It does not automatically self adjust itself at base pressure, put more pressure VIA the pump and you need to adjust the base back down again.

Test it at all voltages again, while adjusting the reg, whats the min and max pressure it will hold? Pretty wide in all cases and within its working limits?

A fuel pressure regulator does not work the way you played with it.

Turn up the pump voltage and expect the pressure to rise, then readjust your regulator to bring it down to where you need it.

Um.....actually, it is supposed to do exactly as Mafia expects, and not as you suggest. That is the whole point of the word "regulator". Spring on one side of a diaphragm, fluid pressure on the other, balance each other and move the needle in/on the seat to open and close the orifice so as to maintain pressure where it is set. The setting adjusts the set point, not the absolute opening of the valve.

okay so I should be able to turn up the pump to full speed and still be at 300kpa? Or is there a careful balance with the size of the hole and flow? Surely when flowing 1200hp worth of fuel this tiny little hole is becoming a restriction at lower rpm?

The issue is if I set the base pressure at full pump speed, then when at medium and low the base pressure is well under 300kpa.

Obviously any given pressure regulator will have a maximum flow that it can "bypass". A regulator with an orifice too small to bypass all the flow required will of course be unable to control the pressure when fuel load demand is low - hence the pressure will rise above set point (until the delta P across the reg is enough to force the extra flow through). A big(ger) regulator that has a bigger orifice in it may not be able to control fuel pressure as well when the reg is nearly closed (ie at engine loads where a lot of fuel is being used) because the valve will be on and off the seat rather than smoothly controlling.

That's why it's important to get the sizing of a regulator (for any pressure control application) correct. At least with fuel pressure regs on petrol engines it seems like we can get away with not having to be too picky. After all, the range of power outputs we're talking about (and hence the range of fuel flows needing control of) is only in the range of 100 - 500 HP for the most part. That's a range of only half an order of magnitude and it is quite possible that you only need 1 or 2 different sizes of regulator to span that range. In industrial situations, I might have to design a diesel valve train for a burner that is only a few hundred kW, and I might have to design one that is 50 MW. That's a range of at least 2 orders of magnitude - hence you have to carefully size and specify the reg to get the combination of flow capacity and pressure control you need.

Mine was doing the same thing, but I have no issues with my evo now I drilled the vac generator on the side of the pump housing to 4mm. It's not the reg as I use the same Turbosmart 1200.

Is the tank lid all stock, or do you have an aftermarket setup?

I tested mine with the return line into a 20L bottle to eliminate the venturi / jet pump.

I over did it and bought a radium engineering venturi for $120. It has 3 changeable nozzles, <250lph, 250-500lph, and >500lph

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...