Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Listen to me very carefully.

The H stands for Helical.  The V stands for Viscous.  Those two diff centres have different length stub axles.  Actually, I think it is only one of them that is different.  But anyway, if you have the stub axles that fit a helical centre you cannot fit them into a diff centre (say, the 1.5 way you're looking at) if it suits a viscous centre.  Likewise, if you have the stub axles to suit a viscous centre, you cannot fit them into a centre intended to replace a helical centre.

THAT is why there is a different part number.  The diff centres actually are different.  However, and this is important.  BOTH centres (both part numbers) will fit pretty much ANY R200 housing.  So long as you have the stub axles to go with them.  Now, if you need to obtain stubs to suit a viscous centre, that's easy.  They're lying around in any wrecker.  But if you need to obtain stubs to suit a helical, then it might take a bit more searching. The reason?  Because there are so very very few R34s out there with helical diffs.

That's right.  Most R34 manuals have a viscous diff.  If you look in the Nismo guide you'll see the earlier cars are viscous.  I should know, I bought one (hoping it was helical).

 

Short answer, As you have stated that you know your diff is viscous, then I promise you that any centre to suit an originally viscous diff will fit your car.  What I cannot promise you is that the 1.5 way centre you'd like to buy suits a viscous or a helical (well, you know, the stub axles).  But there's probably no-one except Nismo ever made a diff to replace the helical. Most people with a helical would not replace it with a mech diff anyway.

Thanks yet again GTSBoy, that's great!

I have the viscous diff so I'm guessing that I should be able to just reuse the existing stub axles, yes? Given that the diff centres are the same dimensions.

Also I tracked down the part number on the actual box, it only says 38420-RS015 , no -A or -BA. This supports your point above that the only difference is the stub axles, the centre is the same.

So I missed a critical line in the Nismo catalogue:

  • Application          1.5WAY Part no.    Diff type (axle)   Final ratio   
  • ~’00/8                  38420-RS015-BA  R200V/R200H  4.083/4.111
  • M/T車‘ 00/8~      38420-RS015-A    R200H              4.111
  • M-A/T車‘ 00/8~  38420-RS015-BA  R200V              4.083

So judging by the part number I'm guessing that pre-08/2000 cars all have the viscous centre.

Therefore, contrary to popular belief, a lot of R34 GTT manuals also came with a viscous diff, just like the autos. I probably missed this in an earlier post..

For anyone else looking here's some part numbers:

Nismo GT LSD for R34 (off the Nismo 2016 catalogue):

27930122490_5f196e7cd3_b.jpg

Nismo GT LSD Pro for R34 (off the Nismo 2016 catalogue):

28133361361_3f3264c9c2_b.jpg

Kaaz for R34 (off eBay):

28210641175_1498291019_b.jpg

Looks like the model year ranges are not entirely consistent so caveat emptor.

  • Like 1
On ‎7‎/‎8‎/‎2016 at 6:44 PM, V28VX37 said:

Too slow, missed out. Greg I hope you got it!

Yes indeed I did lol.

I got it right as I saw GTSBoy's post >.>
I am a bad person.

But yes - ONLY the R34 Series 2 manuals have a helical from factory. This is 8/2000 to 2001 models (not many in AUS but they do exist). I have a series 2 myself but it's an auto. Also fun, many many plugs and sensors are different to the S1 because.... reasons?
All signs seem to point as GTSBoy said, the center is a different part number only because it has to mate to the helical half shafts.

I suspect the GT Pro model number is the same for all cars as it comes with half shafts to suit. But again this is a suspicion there.

  • Like 1

Haha I knew, well played sir, well played. Keen to hear how it goes, especially with auto on decel when you can't clutch in if the going gets hairy.

Now, what do people think, is there any point in going 1-way Nismo over the OEM viscous unit?

The car is 95% street / 5% track (grip) so a 2-way would be too aggro but I'm guessing a 1.5-way would be a happy clunky compromise...?

3 hours ago, V28VX37 said:

Now, what do people think, is there any point in going 1-way Nismo over the OEM viscous unit?

Oh hell yes.  Face it, viscous diffs are either full time open, open as soon as you give them enough power or soon to be full time open.  As such they have no useful purpose behind any engine that can make enough power to defeat them.  Which is pretty much anything better than stock.  A 1-way diff at least gives you traction under load.

  • Like 1

Ok after much deliberation I have the Nismo 1.5-way on order from Japan ( 38420-RS015-BA ). Will report back once it's in.

Greg's just got his installed too, perhaps he can share some thoughts :)

It would appear I had the best viscous LSD in existence because this Nismo is worse in every way (currently).

I would however wager over time my viscous would flog out with 400rwkw and this Nismo will break/wear in. But currently having it skipping while going around an 80kmh bend isn't really providing more grip for me, given my Viscous didn't actually single spin at all :P

Even though I had the Viscous diff, and my Nismo box had the Viscous part number on it, I was told I absolutely needed the half shafts as the center in the box would not fit my original half shafts. So no light shed there as to which center to actually buy.

Mine is the GT, not the GT Pro. Would recommend the GT Pro, if only so I could make it lock less (for me)

  • Like 1

The viscous diffs are actually the orphans when it comes to stub axle lengths.  Because of the details of the insides of the viscous centres, they end up with one side short and one side with a quite long spline insertion distance, whereas nearly every other type of diff has either even or very close to even lengths.

The Nismo diffs actually come with 2x stubs that would suit an open diff (in terms of length, not the flanges, because all the open diffs were for limp wristed NA cars and they all have 3x2 bolt flanges!).

Greg, you should probably add some of the friction modifier additive to your oil to see if you can calm it down.

  • 5 weeks later...

The Nismo diff is going in tomorrow, yay. Here's the type and part number: Nismo Mechanical LSD GT 1.5way for R34 GTT (38420-RS015-BA). Hopefully it goes in without much drama.

What's the correct procedure for running one of these in?

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
On 7/7/2016 at 11:43 PM, GTSBoy said:

Listen to me very carefully.

The H stands for Helical.  The V stands for Viscous.  Those two diff centres have different length stub axles.  Actually, I think it is only one of them that is different.  But anyway, if you have the stub axles that fit a helical centre you cannot fit them into a diff centre (say, the 1.5 way you're looking at) if it suits a viscous centre.  Likewise, if you have the stub axles to suit a viscous centre, you cannot fit them into a centre intended to replace a helical centre.

THAT is why there is a different part number.  The diff centres actually are different.  However, and this is important.  BOTH centres (both part numbers) will fit pretty much ANY R200 housing.  So long as you have the stub axles to go with them.  Now, if you need to obtain stubs to suit a viscous centre, that's easy.  They're lying around in any wrecker.  But if you need to obtain stubs to suit a helical, then it might take a bit more searching. The reason?  Because there are so very very few R34s out there with helical diffs.

That's right.  Most R34 manuals have a viscous diff.  If you look in the Nismo guide you'll see the earlier cars are viscous.  I should know, I bought one (hoping it was helical).

 

Short answer, As you have stated that you know your diff is viscous, then I promise you that any centre to suit an originally viscous diff will fit your car.  What I cannot promise you is that the 1.5 way centre you'd like to buy suits a viscous or a helical (well, you know, the stub axles).  But there's probably no-one except Nismo ever made a diff to replace the helical. Most people with a helical would not replace it with a mech diff anyway.

 

On 7/18/2016 at 11:42 AM, GTSBoy said:

The viscous diffs are actually the orphans when it comes to stub axle lengths.  Because of the details of the insides of the viscous centres, they end up with one side short and one side with a quite long spline insertion distance, whereas nearly every other type of diff has either even or very close to even lengths.

The Nismo diffs actually come with 2x stubs that would suit an open diff (in terms of length, not the flanges, because all the open diffs were for limp wristed NA cars and they all have 3x2 bolt flanges!).

Greg, you should probably add some of the friction modifier additive to your oil to see if you can calm it down.

 

Just to close the loop, the Nismo Mechanical LSD GT 1.5way for R34 GTT (38420-RS015-BA) comes with plug and play stub axles for the R200 housing (with VLSD) found in the early ER34's. Mine's a 1998 model, originally auto but later converted to manual.

In terms of running in, the story sage continues here: http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/466340-nismo-gt-vs-gt-pro-run-in-time/ . Many fun times have been had.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...