Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

Im currently looking at a few possible turbo options for my car. Im aim for 450-500Hp at the engine with this turbo. Now i first was hoping to stay with an internal gated turbo to keep the engine looking at stock as possible, but after doing some research, it seems that a turbo which has external gate will hold boost better, and have lower spoolup times.

Now is this true. Im paranoid about being defected, so basically if i can have a internal wastegated turbo that will hold boost well, then id be happy to do that, but if my setup wont work efficiently with internal gate, i spose ill have to go ext.

Im looking at garrett turbos atm. Is it possible to somehow fit the stock heat shield over a new low mount turbo setup? Im sure i could modiy it somehow to make it look stock.

Thanks

Dean

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The HKS low mount manifold going on mine has provisions for a heat shield. But saying that it still wont stop a nice police man for defecting you for that non std. gear knob. U know, the big safety issue it is :D

With mine....well if you are gunna get pulled over for a bs reason...go the whole hog.

But yes bigger turbos were meant for external wastegates....if you wanna do it properly go the external. Im not saying people dont have good results though from an internal wastegate. The new Ford xr6 is a GT35 internal gate i believe...ford must have some trust in them :)

Regency (Transport SA) has final say. Engineers reports, ADR tests anything means nothing to them here. If they are unhappy with it, it wont pass.

They even defect ADR approved steering wheels, Engineers certificates, and emission tests (which here in Adelaide cost 2k+)

And you cannot take them to court, because they are covered by the law itself...

that's a hard one, 500hp+low mount+ stock looking? i think maybe you should raise your middle finger to the law! a 500hp motor is easier with a big single on a high manifold, but the first option i can think of is the HKS 3037 with internal gate, which may be hard to find.

if you are going to change the manifold go external gate, if keeping std manifols go internal. My reason being that the external gate position on the std manifold as per may last setup is not the best and its not easy to set up right. But if you are chnaging the manifold go external and mount it low down below the turbo.

Grepin runs a 2835r i think and is making 280 or so and its internal gate, JMS have on on their site for 2500 is a t25 flange but can use adaper to make it fit, this would be ideal. You will make a easy 250rwkw and shoudl do 300 just with a internal gate turbo.

I got a GCG 450hp turbo and it makes around 265kw at wheels.. Not sure on Hp, I think its about 360 or so.. Looks standard but hauls arse over the standard turbo.. But then again its around 2k for the rebuild so you have to weigh up what you want the car to be for before selecting your turbo setup ect..

I got a GCG 450hp turbo and it makes around 265kw at wheels.. Not sure on Hp, I think its about 360 or so.. Looks standard but hauls arse over the standard turbo.. But then again its around 2k for the rebuild so you have to weigh up what you want the car to be for before selecting your turbo setup ect..

$2000 to rebuild ur stock turbo or $2400 for a nice new twin ball bearing garrett GT30.

I know what i would be buying and did buy.

If u r serious go external gate, you know you will get bored eventually and get one in the end :)

Guest Robo's
$2000 to rebuild ur stock turbo or $2400 for a nice new twin ball bearing garrett GT30.

I know what i would be buying and did buy.

If u r serious go external gate, you know you will get bored eventually and get one in the end :)

Sounds cheap being a $400 difference, but show us the real costs in the transplant!

robo youd have to beat my car in arolling run because you have 3rwkws more and 600rpm less lag! ive just had my stainless manifold fitted and will be getting the car tuned shortley will post my results. i doubt ill get much ove 225rwkws??? if i had my $2000 to spend again id go a gt30 everytime . yes more stuffing around to fit but you stand to gain more power in the long run.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...