Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

gt badge side indicators

Hi everyone,

If you are like me you will have always hated the ADR requirement of needing a side mounted indicator (it's up there with the 3rd brake light rule!), cutting holes in aluminium gtr guards to fit hideous generic indicators.... well I have hopefully came up with a solution! At the moment I have the design made and I'm working on actually creating the real deal of making a gt badge looking equivalent (as you see on every skyline) into a ADR approved side indicator. the part will be UV resistant acrylic resin to withstand the harsh sun and hopefully look similar enough to not even be noticed until it's flashing. I am hoping to sell these on if  all prototyping going well ( and may even do ones to suit specific other models) but at this stage it's just a bit of a test and I guess a gauge of interest.

the current design is based on a 32 gtr badge, same dimesions of the shield but it will stick out 14mm instead of roughly 10mm the stock badge does.

thanks for any input 

 

Capture 2.JPG

Capture 3.JPG

Capture.JPG

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/469690-gt-badge-side-indicators/
Share on other sites

I had planned on originally 3d printing them but there are a few reasons i decided against it;

1. i want this factory sized, so I'm limited to what size/wattage globe a can use and really for it to be anything more than a dull glow in pitch black it needs to be crystal clear.

2. plastic that's UV stable isn't generally clear, and if it is it's not a standard 3D printed media.

3. 3D printing would mean either the gt coloured sections would need to be glued in separate pieces, or painted.... i don't have a steady enough hand to paint that.. so means paying someone else to.... for it to peel off after one summer worth of sun. the gt coloured parts are set inside the cast acrylic so colour shouldn't fade, glued parts can't fall out and it gives a nice smooth surface to polish :)

4. 3D printing isn't cost effective, along with it having to be a non standard media which means a specialist....who will charge like a specialist. I'm planning on selling these for <$100 a pair, the 3D printed parts will be near on that which will still need sanding (3D printers don't give a smooth surface) and painted..... more money and more time.

I'm not trying to shoot down your idea more just show I have thought about it already and I couldn't make it work haha.

thanks for your input :)

Capture.JPG

  • Like 1

little bit of an update... most of the parts I need to get this underway have arrived,

the 'G' and 'T' acrylic inserts look to be the right size which is a good start - the letters aren't exactly the same size as factory but due to how the original badge is designed it looked uneven when both tiles are the same size.

my 3D printed pieces- which are going to be used to create the moulds and the tooling to hold the g/t tiles correctly while the resin sets. 

and finally the acrylic resin.

so hopefully this weekend ill get some time to sand, prime and paint the 3D printed pieces to give a nice smooth surface to make the moulds from, until then thanks for looking

image1 (1).JPG

image2 (1).JPG

  • Like 1

didn't get much time over the weekend... and it's a real pain/slow to sand nylon (needed filler and 6 coats of primer to get a decent surface finish) but both parts are painted and should be able to clear coat tomorrow afternoon... then more sanding.... then hopefully making the mould! 

all going to plan I would like to do other models for stagea, s series and the different r series... but need these to work well before i get ahead of myself.

now back to making the design for the globe holder so it stays water tight and can actually light up

thanks for reading

bit of an update.... though not a massively exciting one.

I had to redo all the painting and sanding again because nylon is a complete pain! because i'm only painting thin layers at a time it's rather hard not to sand through the paint and as soon as you touch the nylon it sort of threads ( for lack of a better term) which does not sand well and can be seen through layers of paint. But i have got there in the end with a surface finish that im happy with and currently have the main part in the solution creating a mould:3_grin:

here are a few photo's just of why i didn't 3D print the entire part and why I have wasted many hours sanding and painting a little plastic block, when you compare the surface finish straight front the printer simply isn't good enough.

image1 (2).JPG

image1 (3).JPG

image2 (2).JPG

image3 (1).JPG

image4.JPG

update.....but not the good kind

the first piece out of the mould today.. and by out of the mould i mean it glued itself completely to it and i needed to cut the mould, freeze the tool and badge together and smash it with a hammer to get the tool back out. I did have photos but instead of sending them to mail I sent it to trash....not all that smart of me -__- 

It would seem though believe it or not that not everything on youtube is as easy as it seems! I know shocking. On the upside the piece that was welded to the tool actually did look pretty good, the GT pieces sat nicely and even after the hammering were still held solid inside the cast so i don't think durability will be an issue, also there were minimal air bubbles in the resin for a first attempt. So I'm not giving up, but it may be a while till the next update. I will have to find a better release agent, repair the tools and redo the mould.. so basically starting from scratch again :mage:

  • 1 month later...

Awesome idea!

could I make a suggestion? I've always hated the GT badges on my GTR......I think the guard badges need to be small GTR badges like they have on the R35, could you make it a scaled down version of the boot badge that the 'R' lights up?

An excellent job so far and how much further have you gotten ?

Just a few suggestions;

Clear casting resin may well be your friend here as its used a lot in the boating and water sports industries and tinting it with a suitable transparent colorant is fairly simple.

Also a good molding silicon will allow you to cast multiple units after you have made a mold of the finished product 

  • 6 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Sorry for the complete lack of updates on this.... it's been pushed to the back of the list for a while now. I have a few big projects happening currently... a build for racewars which is nothing but one off parts and a 1jz type x that a lot of attention (read a heap more custom parts) is going into to keep it race reliable. But I have looked into a few different options thanks to some of your suggestions and hopefully give it another shot sometime soon

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...

Hi Guys,

Bit of an update,

gave this another go... didn't work

changed some things.... didn't work

redesigned the entire thing with new tools and everything... and this is what i gotIMG_5757.JPG.ac06765f899062bd118e8923d89cb198.JPG

IMG_5760.JPG.10f86ae6f0f7dc89ce8fbe20d46a9943.JPG

Now i wouldn't get too excited but it is at least a workable piece. I have had issues the whole time with the tool not releasing after it's set no matter what i have used I just can't get it to release. So this design actually has a 3D printed transparent skeleton inside the part then the acrylic is set around that.... which of course needs elaborate brackets to keep everything in the right spot while setting inside the mould. A lot of work for something so small and unimportant!

While I am happy the part can actually be made and i can now make the bulb holder and call it 'completed' the issue still remains that the quality of the final product isn't up to scratch, around the tiles on the face there are still a lot of bubbles and because I haven't remade another mould it has deteriorated and the surface finish isn't perfect. I can fix the later easy enough make a new mould and/or sand back the surface, but the bubbles is a bit more difficult and unless i can find a practical solution that gives a better success rate i'm unlikely to make these for other people. I have enough resin to make probably another 30 of these which i will no doubt still try to do for my car but if I can't get at least 50% to set without bubbles on the front face I won't be ordering more (the resin is not cheap). 

IMG_5761.JPG.96ed3c703ccd3a0f7f9c68a6a3aaf2a7.JPG

 I will keep you updated with at least a working prototype soon and hopefully some better news on the castings

until then thanks for looking and let me know if you have any ideas!

IMG_5758.JPG

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...